Dos

I see how it is, LIV Golf has a successful event at a World Class Venue (Valderrama) that everyone is obviously talking about. Flush reports from site the reality of LIV Golf the golf media is not reporting. Then newest PGAT marketing partner comes out with a report citing "sources" from a LIV Golf vendor (NOT A LIV GOLF EXEC) and instead of going and asking the same people Flush talked too, that new PGAT marketing partner doesn't follow the journalists code of ethics and reports a one sided story and it gets re-posted on every PGAT marketing partner and golf news outlets without verification because that's what they do with negative LIV reports. If Flush got people to talk to him then that PGAT marketing partner should have gotten them to talk too. But wait, if he would have gotten the LIV people to talk then there is no story, clicks or re-posts. He better hope his "sources" are correct, if not EVERYONE will know how that report came about. In 7 weeks we will know. That reporter just put his entire reputation on a report from a vendor because he decided he wasn't going to follow the code of ethics.