A stray dog had begun following Hindu pilgrims during the Kataragama Pada Yatra in Sri Lanka. Videos of the dog travelling with the pilgrims were widely shared and warmly received in Hindu circles. Then a video appeared showing a man kicking the dog. It triggered anger online and led to an argument on social media. During that argument, religious insults were exchanged. A Sri Lankan man named Sivarasa Anojan, who was working in Saudi Arabia, responded to a derogatory remark about Hinduism with a comment that was allegedly insulting to the Prophet. Later, he deleted his comment and recorded an apology, explaining that he had reacted after seeing an insult against his own religion. But someone had already taken a screenshot. According to his family, the screenshot was sent to his employer in Saudi Arabia. The employer reported the matter to the authorities. Sivarasa Anojan was arrested. He was initially sentenced to 5 years in prison and fined 3 million Saudi riyals. The prosecution appealed. The case was then reconsidered under Saudi Arabia's Sharia-based legal framework, and the punishment was increased to death. He is now facing a death sentence. He responded to an insult against his faith, deleted his comment, and apologized. Yet the person who first insulted Hinduism and made derogatory remarks faced no punishment, while Sivarasa Anojan ended up facing a death sentence. So, insult one religion, face no consequences. Speak up in response, pay with your life. Apparently, that’s justice.