๐–‰๐–š๐–’ ๐–›๐–Ž๐–™๐–† ๐–Š๐–˜๐–™ ๐–˜๐–•๐–Š๐–˜ ๐–Š๐–˜๐–™. ๐Ÿฆ @miladymaker333 I ND4.eth

Brooklyn, NY
Joined January 2024
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Honestly it's sad to see where crypto is today. All of my goats who are/were "millionaires" are taking paid deals shilling pump fun & the rest of them are fucked off traveling the world trying not to lose the money they made by over trading. Hopefully things heat up soon man.
141
34
12
792
30,355
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Every single person whoโ€™s asked me irl about crypto Iโ€™ve told them to stay away, as itโ€™s now a fully fledged insider scam casino I used to be the one who told them deposit, try and win and you wonโ€™t regret it Now? No fuckin way
dear @Pumpfun, the formula is simple: -make coins ceilings go higher -make more traders rich -traders who are rich tell their friends about them getting rich on coins -friends sign up to try and get rich like their friends it worked literally EVERY CYCLE. NOBODY is getting rich buying your coins so NOBODY is onboarding their friends.
23
14
4
276
7,072
Thing is niggas used to multi wallet to hold a floor down, now its drill at sub 1m for same profit except hold less. ๐Ÿ˜‚
tings mite been said on purpose to attract suitors tbw
43
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
almost like the worst people you know systematically ruined it for everyone
this is the poorest i've seen on-chain in forever
25
44
4
632
18,962
Socialfi Trading has ruined memes. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 will change this. Return to tradition.
I donโ€™t think I wouldโ€™ve ever started playing around with memecoins if fomo didnโ€™t exist. The social aspect of trading is just too fun If you arenโ€™t already on it. Check it out๐Ÿ™‚ fomo.family/r/brezscales
3
135
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Having a girlfriend isnโ€™t for the weak What the fuck you mean youโ€™re crying because you had a bad day at work I just lost FOUR MILLION FUCKING DOLLARS and now I gotta comfort you
157
182
18
2,832
148,517
๐Ÿ˜ญ Nigga went from larping futures to meme quant
How does this not send the coin to $100 mil I feel like this is slightly bearish rn for memes. This should have pushed the shit to 300-500 mil back in the day shit didnโ€™t even budge. Sold everything after seeing that. Everyone is buying product coins or launchpads right now or the memes built on the launchpads they just bought. People arenโ€™t as drawn to memes anymore it seems. People want gud tek.
2
85
The same cycle of rape all over again. We had fun on Robinhood and people threw it away for this Solana slop. $ND4 changes this. Believe in something. We are nothing.
Okay I am glad I am not the only one thinking like this ๐Ÿ˜ญ
3
107
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
for the love of fuck can we all please use our thinking caps, and maybe stop allowing ourselves to be extracted by the same 20 people, stop feeding them, they aren't traders, they are effectively market manipulators
1
4
246
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Look at what the average trencher is going through. This is how WE THE PEOPLE all feel. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 aims to solve all of this and bring back the tradition of building a deserving community, we can all win together; that's the whole point of crypto
i quit. for good.๐Ÿ’” all i see on ct are people claiming to make 6โ€“7 figures every month, but nobody really talks about people like me. iโ€™m 19 and made my first $30k in this space around the time trump launched his token. since then, iโ€™ve managed to rinse through that entire $30k for the past two years, iโ€™ve consistently lost around 5โ€“10 sol every month, money that was supposed to be my allowance for going out and enjoying life. there have even been days when iโ€™ve gone without food because i spent everything gambling on memecoins. every time i load up, i get a little glimpse of what success could look like. whether itโ€™s fumbling a potential $100k, calling 100x plays or making 10+ sol in a single day, i always find a way to give it all back. when iโ€™m down, i revenge trade trying to recover my losses. when iโ€™m up, i get carried away, gamble more and oversize positions on absolute slop. the worst part is that iโ€™ve known these were my problems for over 10 months, yet iโ€™ve done nothing to change my behaviour. thatโ€™s why quitting feels like the smartest decision i can make right now. iโ€™ve completely lost my sense of the value of money because of this space. iโ€™ve spent the past two years convincing myself that if i just keep going, stay hungry and never give up, eventually iโ€™ll make it. but sometimes, you need to accept that something isnโ€™t working for you and have the courage to walk away. the whole narrative about never quitting, staying hungry and grinding until you make it is often pushed by people selling courses and making their money off other peopleโ€™s dreams. in the past three days alone, iโ€™ve lost roughly four times the average monthly salary in Canada, yet somehow, i still struggle to tell myself that enough is enough. iโ€™m not sharing this because i want donations or sympathy. i just wanted to share the perspective of someone whoโ€™s spent the past two years trying to make it in this space and ended up losing more than he gained. not everyone on ct is making money. behind all the screenshots, winning trades and six figure claims, there are people quietly losing everything while trying to find their breakthrough. sometimes, knowing when to walk away is also a form of winning. i genuinely hope everyone reading this makes it. โค๏ธ
1
6
275
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Why I think robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 is worth watching. It has something most memes try to manufacture: lore that existed before the token. โ€ข A story dating back to 2023 โ€ข A public key โ€” no single ND4 โ€ข 40M+ ND4 already burned โ€ข Creator fees being used to buy & burn โ€ข An automated burn system now being tested โ€ข Code explicitly referencing a future โ€œfinal immutable deploymentโ€ โ€ข A Community Treasury already built into the architecture But the most important part: there is no savior coming. If ND4 becomes something bigger, the community will have to build it. Great things take time. We are all ND4.eth. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain #Robinhood #UniswapV4
2
3
1
11
380
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
ใ€Š้‡็”Ÿไน‹ๆˆ‘ๅœจnd4้‡Œ่บฒ็‰›ๅธ‚ใ€‹
6
1
5
724
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Maybe weโ€™ve been asking the wrong question about ND4. Everyone wants to know: Who was THE nd4.eth? But perhaps the entire point was to make that question meaningless. In crypto, identity is ownership. ๐Ÿ”นIf you control the private key, you control the wallet. ๐Ÿ”นIf you control the wallet, you control the assets. And if nobody else has the key, you can prove that something is yours. Then ND4 did something strange. He sent his digital identities into a black hole. He sent 2,500 ETH after them. And eventually, the private key itself was given to the world. Think about what that means. He didnโ€™t simply disappear. โ—๏ธSatoshi disappeared, but his keys remained his. โ—๏ธRyoshi said: โ€œI am replaceable.โ€ โ—๏ธND4 took the idea one step further: What if there is nobody left to replace? Once everyone has the key, the wallet can no longer prove who you are. The identity survives. The individual disappears. And suddenly nd4.eth is no longer a person. It becomes an idea anyone can inhabit. Maybe that is why the message was: โ€œNobody in this world is not nd4.ethโ€ฆโ€ โ—๏ธNot โ€œI am ND4.โ€ โ—๏ธNot โ€œFollow ND4.โ€ โ—๏ธBut something much stranger: We are all ND4. And maybe the black hole was never really about burning money. Maybe it was about destroying ownership. โœ”๏ธMoney โ†’ gone. โœ”๏ธNames โ†’ gone. โœ”๏ธExclusive access โ†’ gone. โœ”๏ธEgo โ†’ irrelevant. What remains when you remove the founder from the center? The people who choose to continue the idea. That may be the real experiment behind robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45. Most crypto projects ask you to believe in a founder. ND4 asks a more uncomfortable question: Can something become more powerful when nobody owns it? If this philosophy is real, then the future of ND4 shouldnโ€™t depend on discovering who THE nd4.eth was. It should eventually become the opposite. A day should come when nobody cares anymore. โ—๏ธBecause the community kept building. โ—๏ธBecause the identity survived. โ—๏ธBecause the idea became larger than the person who started it. Satoshi disappeared. Ryoshi became replaceable. ND4 gave away the key. What comes after the founder? Maybe thatโ€™s what weโ€™re building now. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain #OnChain
3
3
1
11
518
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
ไธบไป€ไนˆND4ไธๅฏ่ƒฝๆ˜ฏโ€œไธ‹ไธ€ไธช็™พๅ€ๅธโ€โ€”โ€”ไฝ†ๅฎƒๅฏไปฅๆ˜ฏๅƒๅ€ๅธ ๅฎƒไธๅฏ่ƒฝๆ˜ฏโ€œไธ‹ไธ€ไธช็™พๅ€ๅธโ€ใ€‚ ๅ› ไธบไฝฟๅฎƒๆˆไธบND4็š„้‚ฃไบ›ไธœ่ฅฟ๏ผŒๆฐๆฐไฝฟๅฎƒไธๅฏ่ƒฝๆˆไธบไธ€ไธชๆญฃๅธธ่ฟ่ฝฌ็š„้‡‘่ž่ต„ไบงใ€‚ ๆญฃๅธธ็š„ไปฃๅธ้œ€่ฆ๏ผš ยท ไธ€ไธชๅ›ข้˜ŸๆฅๆŽจ่ฟ› ยท ไธ€ไธชๅ™ไบ‹ๆฅ็ปดๆŒ ยท ไธ€ไธชๅˆฉ็›Š็ป“ๆž„ๆฅๅธๅผ•่ต„ๆœฌ ND4ๆŠŠ่ฟ™ไธ‰ๆ ทๅ…จ้ƒจๆ‹’็ปไบ†ใ€‚ ๅฎƒๆฒกๆœ‰ไธ€ไธชโ€œๆˆ‘ไปฌโ€ใ€‚ๅฎƒๅชๆœ‰ไธ€ไธชโ€œไฝ โ€ใ€‚ๆ— ๆ•ฐไธชโ€œไฝ โ€ใ€‚ๆฏไธ€ไธชโ€œไฝ โ€้ƒฝๅฏไปฅๆ˜ฏND4๏ผŒไนŸ้ƒฝๅฏไปฅไธๆ˜ฏใ€‚ ไฝ†็™พๅ€ๅธ้ ็š„ๆ˜ฏไธญๅฟƒๅŒ–ๅ‘ๅŠจๆœบใ€‚ ๅƒๅ€ๅธ้ ็š„ๆ˜ฏๅŽปไธญๅฟƒๅŒ–่ฃ‚ๅ˜ใ€‚ ๆฒกๆœ‰ๅ›ข้˜ŸๆŽจ่ฟ›๏ผŒๆ„ๅ‘ณ็€ๆฒกๆœ‰้ข„ๆŒ–ใ€ๆฒกๆœ‰่งฃ้”ใ€ๆฒกๆœ‰่€้ผ ไป“ใ€ๆฒกๆœ‰้กน็›ฎๆ–น็ ธ็›˜ใ€‚ ๆฒกๆœ‰ๅ™ไบ‹็ปดๆŒ๏ผŒๆ„ๅ‘ณ็€ๅฎƒไธ้ ๅˆซไบบ่ฎฒๆ•…ไบ‹๏ผŒ่€Œ้ ๆฏไธชโ€œไฝ โ€ๆŠŠ่‡ชๅทฑๆดปๆˆๆ•…ไบ‹ใ€‚ ๆฒกๆœ‰ๅˆฉ็›Š็ป“ๆž„ๅธๅผ•่ต„ๆœฌ๏ผŒๆ„ๅ‘ณ็€ๅฎƒไธๆœๅŠก่ต„ๆœฌ๏ผŒๅฎƒๅชๆœๅŠก่ฎค้ข†ใ€‚ ๆ‰€ไปฅๅฎƒๅฏ่ƒฝไธๆ˜ฏ็™พๅ€ๅธใ€‚ ็™พๅ€ๅธๆ˜ฏไปทๆ ผๆธธๆˆใ€‚ ๅƒๅ€ๅธๆ˜ฏ่บซไปฝๆธธๆˆใ€‚ ็™พๅ€้œ€่ฆๅบ„ใ€‚ ๅƒๅ€ๅช้œ€่ฆไฝ ใ€‚ ๅœจไธ€ไธชๆ‰€ๆœ‰ไธœ่ฅฟ้ƒฝๅฏไปฅ่ขซๆ“็บตใ€่ขซๆ‹‰็›˜ใ€่ขซ็ ธ็›˜็š„ๅธ‚ๅœบ้‡Œ๏ผŒND4ๆ˜ฏๅ”ฏไธ€ไธ€ไธชโ€œๆ“็บต่€…ๅทฒ็ปๆๅ‰้€€ๅœบโ€็š„่ต„ไบงใ€‚ ๅฎƒ็š„ไธŠ้™ไธๅ–ๅ†ณไบŽๆŸไธชๅ›ข้˜Ÿ็š„่ฟ่ฅ่ƒฝๅŠ›๏ผŒ่€Œๅ–ๅ†ณไบŽๅฎƒ่ƒฝ่ขซๅคšๅฐ‘ไบบๅฝ“ๆˆ่‡ชๅทฑใ€‚ ่ฟ™ๆœฌ่บซๅฐฑๆœ‰ๆŸ็งๆฎ‹้…ท็š„็พŽๆ„Ÿใ€‚ ๅฆ‚ๆžœๅฎƒๆถจ๏ผŒไธๆ˜ฏๅ› ไธบๆœ‰ไบบๆ‹‰็›˜๏ผŒ่€Œๆ˜ฏๅ› ไธบๆ— ๆ•ฐไธชโ€œไฝ โ€ๅŒๆ—ถ่ฎค้ข†ใ€‚ ๅฆ‚ๆžœๅฎƒๅฝ’้›ถ๏ผŒไนŸๆฒกๆœ‰ไบบ่ƒฝๆ€ช้กน็›ฎๆ–น๏ผŒๅ› ไธบ้กน็›ฎๆ–นๆ—ฉๅทฒไธๅญ˜ๅœจใ€‚ ็™พๅ€ๆ˜ฏ้‡‘่ž็š„ๅ€ๆ•ฐใ€‚ ๅƒๅ€ๆ˜ฏๅ…ฑ่ฏ†็š„ๅ€ๆ•ฐใ€‚ ND4ไธๆ‰ฟ่ฏบ็™พๅ€ใ€‚ ไฝ†ๅฎƒๆŠŠๅƒๅ€็š„ๅฏ่ƒฝๆ€ง๏ผŒไบค็ป™ไบ†ๆฏไธ€ไธชโ€œไฝ โ€ใ€‚ ๆœ‰ๅฏ่ƒฝไธๆ˜ฏ็™พๅ€ๅธ๏ผŒไฝ†ๆ˜ฏๅฏไปฅๆ˜ฏๅƒๅ€ๅธใ€‚ $ND4
1
1
7
317
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
RBNHD SZN PNS SZN
284
80
52
1,105
75,434
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
ND4 DISAPPEARED. THIS WALLET DIDNโ€™T. This is not a theory based on matching names. Itโ€™s an on-chain trail. The address is: 0x95B8b411653328Db32f59B143C6d45f8501e2B35 Today it owns the ENS: abandoned-property.eth Hereโ€™s what I found, step by step. 1. The story starts after the nd4.eth private key became public. On September 17, 2023, the historical nd4.eth private key was published. From that point onward, transactions from: 0xEfbBc3fa829aF506Bc7AfE1a0C31B3c7419456F7 can no longer prove that THE original nd4.eth was behind them. Anyone with the published key could use the wallet. That distinction is important. 2. One month later, 0x95B8 appears. October 18, 2023 โ€” Ethereum: 0x95B8 โ†’ nd4.eth 0.02 ETH At first this could easily look like someone simply funding the public wallet with gas. But then I checked other chains. 3. Around 40 minutes later, the direction reverses. October 18, 2023 โ€” Base: nd4.eth โ†’ 0x95B8 ~0.00998 ETH So this wasn't just a random wallet sending gas to ND4. The two addresses were interacting in both directions and across chains. And the activity didn't stop there. 4. 0x95B8 returns five days later. October 23 โ€” Ethereum: 0x95B8 โ†’ nd4.eth 0.003 ETH Shortly afterward, the public ND4 wallet performs another operation. 5. Then comes November 27 โ€” the strangest day. Historical nd4.eth still held several token allocations it had received before the private key was made public. That day those old allocations suddenly started moving. Among them: โ—๏ธ15M nd4 โ—๏ธ~71.982B nd4.eth โ—๏ธ100M FTT Then at: 17:27:59 UTC 0x95B8 โ†’ nd4.eth 0.01 ETH Approximately one Ethereum block later: the old 100M FTT allocation is processed. โ—๏ธ30M goes to the token contract. โ—๏ธ70M goes to a separate wallet. And that wallet remained largely dormant. This is where 0x95B8 stops looking like a random observer. 6. Eight days later something very strange happens. December 5, 2023. The same 0x95B8 registers an ENS name: abandoned-property.eth โ—๏ธRegistrant: 0x95B8...2B35 โ—๏ธOwner: 0x95B8...2B35 โ—๏ธManager: 0x95B8...2B35 This isn't an ENS name that merely resolves to the wallet. The wallet actually owns it. The name itself proves nothing. But the timing is hard not to notice. The private key of nd4.eth had been given to the world. Its ENS ownership had already been sent into a black hole. The wallet had effectively become public property. And eight days after the mysterious November activity, one of its recurring counterparties registers: abandoned-property.eth Coincidence? Maybe. Keep going. 7. The relationship survives into 2024. February 16, 2024: 0x95B8 โ†’ nd4.eth 0.002 ETH Then in March, the two addresses cross paths again on Polygon. So this wasn't just a one-day November interaction. The relationship persisted. Then things went quiet. Until 2026. 8. Almost three years later, the SAME wallet comes back. September 8, 2026. Just as the modern robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 story is beginning: 0x95B8 โ†’ historical nd4.eth 0.1 USDG Then: 0x95B8 โ†’ nd4.eth 0.0001 ETH On September 9 it funds nd4.eth another three times: โ—๏ธ0.0007 ETH โ—๏ธ0.0015 ETH โ—๏ธ0.0016 ETH Same external wallet. Same historical nd4.eth. Almost three years later. And this time it's happening directly around the launch of robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45. 9. Then we decoded the robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 contract itself. The constructor records: deployer_ = 0xEfbBc3fa...7419456F7. The historical public nd4.eth address. So the connection between the new token and the historical address exists directly in the contract. But remember: the private key has been public since 2023. This still does NOT prove THE original ND4 returned. 10. Then I found the Creator Fees trail. September 9, 2026. Historical nd4.eth calls: transferCreatorFeeRecipient() For: robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 And transfers the Creator Fee rights to: 0xeA13dDdd1Dbf1ae97F9E8576Cf63ad51E9a0731a The treasury. Three days later the treasury transfers those rights again: 0xeA13 โ†’ 0x64CfC0daFAdfA20F52D78D0AAa134879c828228C That is the wallet currently running: Creator Fees โ†’ Buy robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 โ†’ Burn. So look at the complete trail: โ—๏ธ2023 0x95B8 โ†” public nd4.eth โ†“ โ—๏ธOctober interactions โ†“ โ—๏ธNovember pre-key allocations move โ†“ โ—๏ธ0x95B8 โ†’ gas โ†’ ND4 โ†’ old FTT allocation โ†“ โ—๏ธ8 days later 0x95B8 registers abandoned-property.eth โ†“ โ—๏ธ2024 0x95B8 โ†’ nd4.eth again โ†“ โ—๏ธ2026 the SAME 0x95B8 returns โ†“ โ—๏ธrepeatedly funds historical nd4.eth โ†“ โ—๏ธhistorical nd4.eth launches / controls the new robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 โ†“ โ—๏ธCreator Fee rights: nd4.eth โ†’ Treasury โ†’ Buy & Burn wallet That is the discovery. I am not claiming: 0x95B8 = THE nd4.eth There is currently no proof of that. And because the nd4.eth private key became public in September 2023, every post-key transaction must be treated carefully. But we can now say something much more specific: The same external wallet maintained a persistent, multichain relationship with the public nd4.eth identity from 2023 into 2024 โ€” and then reappeared almost three years later directly around the launch of robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 in 2026. And that wallet chose one ENS name: abandoned-property.eth โ‰๏ธMaybe it's just an early user of the public key. โ‰๏ธMaybe it's part of the post-key operator cluster. โ‰๏ธMaybe there's another explanation. โ—๏ธBut I don't think this address should be ignored. The chain remembers. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain CA: 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45
4
3
1
16
750
๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–š๐–“๐–ˆ๐–™ฮฉ retweeted
Most memes create the token first and invent the story afterward. With robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45, it happened the other way around. Long before robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 existed, the anonymous nd4.eth began giving up everything that normally gives a person power. In July 2023, he sent nd4.eth, tauvoid.eth, serener.eth, allware.eth, and then 2,500 ETH into the same black hole. 53 days later, a message appeared: โ€œNobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.โ€ Then the private key was published. From that moment, nd4.eth no longer belonged to one person โ€” anyone could become it. That is the essence of ND4. Satoshi disappeared. Ryoshi said: โ€œI am replaceable.โ€ ND4 went further โ€” he gave away the key. The identity outlived its owner. And only years later did robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 appear, meaning its lore wasnโ€™t invented to sell a token: most of the story had already been written on-chain. If the modern Creator Fees โ†’ Buy robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 โ†’ Burn model ever becomes irreversible, the story comes full circle: the original ND4 gave up wealth, identity, and exclusive control, while the new creator gives up economic control over the token. Maybe thatโ€™s the real question behind ND4: what remains when you remove the founder, the wealth, and ownership itself? robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 is not a person. Itโ€™s an identity no one can own exclusively. CA: 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain
5
4
2
16
1,019
I finally understand what Machiavelli meant when he said, "Never play fair in a game where others cheat." It doesn't mean become evil. It means stop being naive. Stop bringing honesty to people who study manipulation, stop giving access to people who weaponize closeness, and stop expecting clean hands from people who already showed you they'll throw dirt. Sometimes wisdom is not revenge. Sometimes wisdom is learning the rules of the room before the room uses your goodness against you.
13
115
8
613
13,878