i love video games 馃 Chud IRL 馃
Joined June 2011
- Tweets74.3K
- Following409
- Followers936
- Likes18K
I get posting it on the community focused account
but to not even retweet it on main when its this serious, kinda says somethin man
This weekend, a Dead by Daylight team member awarded in-game content and currency to a creator streaming our game. Although it is not unusual to unlock content to give creators discovering DbD a chance to have a sneak peek at available content, this decision was made without receiving appropriate approvals. Furthermore, the team member's subsequent comments and conduct do not align with Dead by Daylight鈥檚 core values.
When concerns about this decision became apparent during the stream, we should have responded by looking into these concerns, not dismissing them.
Unfortunately, we鈥檝e now seen the fallout of this decision unfolding in many conversations across the DbD community. We appreciate and stand with our community鈥檚 willingness to ensure our shared values are being upheld, at all times, regardless of popularity, and we鈥檙e heartbroken at the inflammatory language now being directed towards our community.
At the same time, threatening employees will never be acceptable, and we鈥檙e asking everyone to stop engaging with these posts.
We apologize to our community for letting you down. We have already begun reviewing our internal processes to prevent an incident like this from happening again.
Bit ironic dbd created the Pulse account for community engagement and not a week later need to use it for community outrage
"wasnt our fault, but we're looking to make sure this doesnt happan again" - feels like scapegoat passing the blame. its hard to believe 1 employee is totally to blame
"pls no witchhunts" - called it
"what else do you expect them to say", idk man, hope they do make change tho
This weekend, a Dead by Daylight team member awarded in-game content and currency to a creator streaming our game. Although it is not unusual to unlock content to give creators discovering DbD a chance to have a sneak peek at available content, this decision was made without receiving appropriate approvals. Furthermore, the team member's subsequent comments and conduct do not align with Dead by Daylight鈥檚 core values.
When concerns about this decision became apparent during the stream, we should have responded by looking into these concerns, not dismissing them.
Unfortunately, we鈥檝e now seen the fallout of this decision unfolding in many conversations across the DbD community. We appreciate and stand with our community鈥檚 willingness to ensure our shared values are being upheld, at all times, regardless of popularity, and we鈥檙e heartbroken at the inflammatory language now being directed towards our community.
At the same time, threatening employees will never be acceptable, and we鈥檙e asking everyone to stop engaging with these posts.
We apologize to our community for letting you down. We have already begun reviewing our internal processes to prevent an incident like this from happening again.
Ppl love to point out systemic problems but when there's someone to directly go after, they drop that to dogpile someone
That just leaves to companies using ppl we scapegoats without actually learning anything, doomed to just repeat the same thing and hope they aren't caught agn
I've always said the social media side of dbd has become the minority
What if we're just finally seeing what the actual community has become
Coupled with the hundreds of harassment screenshots from end game and pre game chats leading to action taken reports
If dbd posts a response, one of the first things is gonna be "erm witch hunting is wrong and we don't support it 馃"
deja vu showed the 3 gen around 8 on Fallen Refuge and not around main at the start of the game, this is why I hate deja vu and think it's a trap perk for lesser experienced players
theres more to criticize over how a streamer cultivates their community than honing in on one or two things they've said 2+ years ago, which is such a mixed bag because you then have the argument split down the middle if a streamer is responsible for their community or not
Not to mention, the people mad about this collab, we have to acknowledge is the smallest minority... most are upset most of the time anyway, myself included a lot
kinda makes sense why they'd sooner care about profits than feelings
I've always worn my heart on my sleeve, even through all my opinions, I've always supported people being who they want to be
I've not been shy I've had a lot of unpoular opinions though
The worst thing, that was one stream that people would have forgotten in a week
But now there's going to be video after video how woke and whiny the dbd community is
On one band idc dbd got BurntPeanut to play dbd, on the other, critiscm is fair because 5 years ago, they were a very progressive company and most of the community devs still are and Peanuts controversy contradicts that