This is an archive of a Biden Administration account, maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration.

Joined February 2021
I can see where someone might think that based on raw numbers: revs/gdp ~ 17%, ~historical avg. But at full emp w above trend growth, you need to be above avg. I wrote about this years ago. @BBKogan & @brendan_duke update here: americanprogress.org/article… financialservices.house.gov/…
3
3
7
3,488
Figure below, imho, is a useful way to look at it, from my 2018 testimony above, but needs an update (Bobby/Brendan update on revs, but good to include spending). Shows spending (sans interest; that's not cuttable) tracking earlier forecasts. The laggard--casualty of tax cuts--
1
2
1,718
--is revenues. To be clear, spending cuts *are* part of the solution. But we definitely have a revs problem. More to come on that... (Data note: see appendix tbl 4 if you want to see spending including interest; same pattern.)
1
1
1,097
These are the numbers behind the "they've got fewer degrees of freedom to play around with potentially inflationary policies" point. Of course, trajectories matter a lot in this context, and there's clearly (bumpy) disinflation; but not so re yields.
3
5
1
18
4,864
Big @bencasselman fan, but this article gets some things wrong--and a lot right. Re the latter, strong agreement @mioana re increased dispersion in economists’ view/advice to policy makers. Min wg, trade, climate, indus policy, full emp, all good eg’s.
Economists are in the wilderness. Politicians and the public have rejected their advice on everything from trade to climate change. They held comparatively little sway under Biden, and stand to hold less under Trump. Can they find their way back to influence?
3
3
3
18
11,505
These views were carefully listened to in internal debates, and reflected in trade policies that were targeted, not sweeping. The idea was always to support full emp and worker bargaining clout at home while maintaining trade flows to boost the supply side.
1
6
1,112
So, misleading to conclude our econ team didn’t get listened to, which I’ll grant you doesn’t mean we prevailed enough, but that’s life.
3
9
1,005
Choosing @WhiteHouseCEA's best graphs of '24 is like choosing your favorite child. But here goes, with minimal commentary as strong figures speak for themselves. Real GDP beat the forecasts...repeatedly! whitehouse.gov/cea/written-m…
6
34
4
73
6,587
...trends and implications of work-from-home, macro, micro, health care, climate, education policy)... And I didn't even mention the stock market, as per this AM's WSJ: wsj.com/finance/stocks/stock…
1
2
10
918
As always, seasonally adjusted greetings from CEA and here's hoping we can build on all this economic progress in the new year!!
3
2
12
837