@edu_trades doing its thing.

@edu_trades es top. Échenle cuenta porque sabe manejar la pelota como nadie. Mi amigo y socio @adrianeltrader que dé fé

I’ve spent 20+ years shorting small caps and reading SEC filings for a living. On Nov 6 I’m doing a free live session on how that actually works. Find Your Trading Edge — live w/ Adam Lambert 📅 Fri, Nov 6 · 12:00 PM ET What we’ll cover: • How I break down SEC filings for edge, long and short • Case studies from real trades • Why community + education matter (and the blow-up mistakes that kill accounts) • A walkthrough of TraderPods • Picking the right prop firm for you One attendee wins a Zimtra Elite account — $20K buying power. Register free: event.webinarjam.com/8zxyo/r… We partner with Zimtra and may receive incentives. Educational only, not trade advice.

A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life. At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday." He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy. Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system. He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting. He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way." The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.

NEW: Tesla Roadster does a mid air summersault from a standstill. WHAT 🤯🤯🤯