eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex) profile picture

Protein Design | LNBIO | CNPEM . ?NTP-A masked autistic, but totally unmasked with you. My heart is in your cage @shibazilla 💜

Joined August 2025
Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)Photo by eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 (@elementarex)
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Todo brasileiro deveria ser obrigado a assistir esse vídeo.
29
507
14
1,528
27,358
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Replying to @1fabiogomes
5
788
6
11,758
121,676
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Replying to @LuigiAdsertor
1
23
282
4,034
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
...
73
2,192
178
19,400
115,685
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Brazil's IBAMA protects the Amazon by literally blowing up Environmental Crime and its tools on the spot Might just be the most morally good force of all time
73
1,302
29
13,995
168,222
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Replying to @subarumanco
103
1,239
481
12,388
1,318,828
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
amiga minha deu essa proposta de ideia legislativa, se vc é a favor da ciencia ajudem a apoiar! www12.senado.leg.br/ecidadan…
9
153
3
289
32,258
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. In 1964, the United States destroyed Brazilian democracy. João Goulart was the democratically elected president. His crime was a reform agenda: Eradicate illiteracy. Let the poor and the illiterate vote. Force multinationals to reinvest their profits inside Brazil. And redistribute land from the hereditary landlords to the rural poor. Schools. Ballots. Land. Washington called it communism. JFK's first secretly taped Oval Office meeting — ever — was about Brazil. On that tape he asked: "What kind of liaison do we have with the military?" A year later: "We've got to do something about Brazil." Then: "Do you see a situation where we might find it desirable to intervene militarily ourselves?" He ordered American aid strangled to "put the screws" on Goulart. Robert Kennedy flew to Brasília to deliver the ultimatum in person, telling Goulart he could not criticize the United States "and at the same time get 250 million dollars from the United States. He can't have it both ways." American aid was never assistance. It was a leash. The CIA poured millions into opposition parties, newspapers, labor unions and landowner groups. Ambassador Lincoln Gordon drew up contingency plans with "a heavy emphasis on armed intervention." And here is the part that tells you this was never about security. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Goulart served as a secret back channel between Kennedy and Castro, helping prevent nuclear war. Washington overthrew him anyway. JFK was assassinated before he could act. Johnson did not hesitate. Three days before the coup, National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy said: "We should not be worrying that the military will react; we should be worrying that the military will not react." And in the same meeting: "We don't want to watch Brazil dribble down the drain while we stand around waiting for the next election." On March 31, 1964, Johnson gave the order: "I think we ought to take every step that we can, be prepared to do everything that we need to do." The Pentagon launched Operation Brother Sam. The aircraft carrier USS Forrestal, six destroyers, and fuel tankers steamed toward Santos to resupply the coup. Goulart fled to Uruguay. Washington recognized the junta within 48 hours. The aid resumed like clockwork. Over 21 years the dictatorship killed or disappeared 434 people, tortured roughly 20,000, and drove tens of thousands into exile. Brazil did not hold another presidential election for 25 years. Now look at 2026. The hereditary landlord class that Washington armed in 1964 is the same landlord class that funded the Bolsonaro dynasty. Lula wants Brazil's rare earths kept out of Pentagon supply chains. He wants Petrobras to stay public. He wants BRICS to break the dollar's chokehold. So the empire sent the same weapons, updated. Fifty percent tariffs instead of a naval task force. Meta censorship instead of CIA cash. AI disinformation instead of paid newspapers. In 1964 they won. In 2026, 64 million Brazilians voted anyway. The empire never changed its mind about who owns Latin America. Latin America simply stopped asking permission.
125
1,856
110
5,132
98,377
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
La mère d’un Brésilien c’est aussi notre mère donc NOTRE MAMAN A VAINCU LE CANCER
MINHA MAMÃE VENCEU O CÂNCER
87
4,522
53
56,647
340,581
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Um mapa muito mais significativo da eleição, pessoas votam, terra não.
280
8,978
968
80,792
4,509,272
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
⚖️"Descondenado". "Não é inocente". "Foi condenado em 3 instâncias". Então eu abri o processo e li o que está escrito. #LulaMaiorDoMundo
56
1,279
27
4,003
60,157
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Missão Internacional de Observadores da OEA atesta integridade do processo eleitoral brasileiro e congratula Lula e Alckmin pela vitória.
71
2,710
72
10,819
112,777
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Já adaptaram para o Brasil.
391
4,890
321
19,922
500,867
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Montei um modelo georreferenciado que estima com base nas sessões eleitorais para onde foram os votos. É estatistico, portanto tem erro associado, mas nesse gráfico dá pra ver que sim, as abstenções levaram cerca de 4 milhões de votos para o Lula, mas não foi só isso. Nulos, brancos e eleitores do Cury potencializaram os números do petista. Disponível em: welwelaraujo.github.io/trans…
23
69
14
614
78,536
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Se passar,não vai ter candidato da extrema-direita e direita... Só vai ter candidato do centro e esquerda...
360
4,051
89
17,256
90,355
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
“Quem votou no Lula não pode reclamar nos próximos 4 anos…” Não só posso, como vou. Elegi um presidente, um servidor público, meu dever cobrar dele o que eu acredito ser melhor. Quem idolatra político geralmente está do outro lado.
912
17,397
237
63,748
492,235
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
O Exército do Lula ainda tá vivo? Topam subir: #GovernadoresContraOPovo ? Porque isso vai cair no colo do Lula a partir do ano que vem... Aumento da gasolina vai ser visto como culpa dele.
3,842
18,557
1,482
41,596
334,156
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
Há muito tempo atrás , eu bricava muito com essa coisa de separar o Sul do Brasil, que o Rio Grande do Sul era meu país. Mas hoje eu percebo que somos uma nação por completo, soberana . Um país feito de muita gente trabalhadora . A gente precisa é acabar com o preconceito entre regiões, o racismo e a homofobia.
26
43
2
356
4,014
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
esse ano aprendemos uma coisa com o fim da 6x1 quando a erika apresentou o projeto, quase TODO MUNDO no congresso era contra mas depois do povo IR PRA RUA todos voltaram atrás e votaram a favor n interessa se é de direita ou esquerda, político NENHUM aguenta pressão popular
29
4,348
33
14,242
52,166
eyeS ☭ 🇧🇷🇨🇳🇫🇷🇩🇪 retweeted
我很愿意认真回答这位德国朋友的疑问。 你的第一个问,其实是在说,由于中国是一个威权政府,因此人民在政治上不受认真对待。 这个命题本身就是错误的。威权政府,并不意味着人民不受认真对待。民主政府,也不意味着人民就受到认真对待。 新加坡是威权国家,菲律宾是民主国家,难道新加坡人的处境,不如菲律宾人吗?中国是威权国家,印度是民主国家,难道中国人的处境,不如印度人吗? 你的第二个问,你的发问本身并不严谨。不能笼统地说,中国人没有政治自由。这个问题要分两个维度来讲。 1、政治参与自由。 从这个维度讲,中国任何人有参与政治的自由。中国人都有权利申请入党、考公务员。筛选规则与民主制度不同,但不等于中国人没有参与政治的自由。 中国制度与民主制度的区别在于: 民主制度下,一个人只要有钱,可以在任何时候参与政治。就像川普一辈子没有从政,老了突然想要竞选总统,他就可以参选,而且成功了。 但在中国,任何官员都必须从基层公务员做起。一个人无法因为有钱,就能一步登天当上高官。 这种制度的好处有: A、公平性。 中国有大量的高层领导人出身平民家庭,如胡锦涛、温家宝、汪洋、李强,等等。像习近平这种红二代,反而是个意外。 B、专业性。 任何一个高层领导人,都必须经过几十年不同级别岗位的历练,他对国家各个层面的情况的了解,以及他的治理经验,不是一个企业家、一个明星,或者一个未治理过一个城市的议员,所能相提并论的。 C、远见性。 由于领导人不受制于短期的、非理性的民意,因此可以规划长远的发展战略,并以唯一执政党确保该战略的长期、有效的实施。 D、政策不受资本干涉。 你选择从政,就不能从商。你选择从商,就不能从政。这样一来,资本的归资本,政治的归政治,资本无法干涉政治。 2、政治权利自由。 当然,中国制度有其“表面上”的代价。为什么只是“表面上”的,后面再说。先说这种代价。 代价就是中国人不拥有谩骂政府、抨击政策的自由。我们可以批评政府,但必须在一种就事论事的理性语境中。我们不能喊“习近平下台”或者“共产党下台”。 我们也不拥有全民选举的自由,建立政党的自由。 这些“代价”为什么只是表面上的,可以从一则寓言说起: 一农场主临死前问儿子;猪抱怨饲料太差,牛报怨活太重,鸡报怨窝太脏,怎么办? 儿子说:“喂好饲料,干轻活,清理鸡窝。” 农场主摇摇头说:你啥都别做,给他们选票,让它们选择你或者你媳妇管它们,让它们以为这个家是它们做主。 这个寓言让我们思考,作为人民,我们要的是什么?我们要的其实是更好的生活,而不是选票以及骂政府的自由。 回到开头那个举例,新加坡缺少很多民主国家所具备的政治自由,但没有人会认为新加坡人受到压迫。 这就涉及到自由的定义,自由到底是什么? 按照罗斯福的定义,自由包括:言论自由、信仰自由、免于匮乏、免于恐惧。 在我们计算一个社会的自由度时,我们计算的是自由的总量,而不是单项自由的含量。 举个例子,很多非洲国家拥有选票和骂政府的自由,但人民生活贫困,出行只能靠双脚。我在中国,生活富足、商品丰富、服务便捷、社区安全,我坐3个小时的高铁可以抵达一座大城市,我也有经济条件时不时出国旅游。 你认为非洲人自由,还是我自由? 诚然,中国还有很多人口,在物质生活上并不自由,但这是经济发展不充分导致的,不是政治压迫导致的。一个贫穷地区,无会因为给你民众选票和骂政府的自由,他们就变富裕了。 因此,当你谈自由的时候,你要计算自由的总量,不能单看一项自由的有无和多寡。你也不能将经济问题,归咎于某一项政治自由的问题。 坦率讲,我觉得你们的民主制度,已经病入膏肓了,中国人并不羡慕你们那种制度。
Liebe Chinesen, wie kann man ein solches politisches System einfach hinnehmen und gleichzeitig erwarten, dass man politisch ernst genommen wird? Ist es nicht widersprüchlich, sich mit einem System abzufinden, in dem die eigene politische Freiheit so stark eingeschränkt ist?
1,267
4,790
1,152
35,270
3,071,296