If you’re chasing something big, you probably think it’s failing that scares you.
But you fail all the time when no one’s watching. In training. On the first draft. In rehearsal. It stings, then you go again.
What actually scares you is failing in front of people. The room going quiet. The look on someone’s face. What they’ll say about you after.
That’s the fear that makes you play safe. You keep the big idea to yourself. You pass when you should shoot. You put out the version nobody could criticize.
But the safe version still gets judged. People will always have an opinion, and you’ll never control that.
What you can train is the fear. Every time you put yourself out there anyway, it gets a little quieter.
So if they’re going to have an opinion, might as well be about the real you.
130
Eric retweeted
Hermes Agent now runs Buzz.
The self-hostable workspace from @blocks puts humans and agents in the same messaging channels and codebase.
Three ways to use Buzz with Hermes (and vice versa):
- Buzz Desktop auto-discovers your Hermes install runs it locally
- A relay bridge gives it a hosted identity in your channels
- Connect via the Hermes Gateway to use Buzz as a full external platform with channels, DMs, threads, reactions, and cron delivery
hermes-agent.nousresearch.co…
Eric retweeted
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter.
AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country.
Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty.
The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models.
images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-W…
Eric retweeted
Open-weight models are essential to a healthy AI ecosystem. Together with others across our industry, we are outlining a path for open-weight models to strengthen American competitiveness and expand economic opportunity, while protecting national security. microsoft.com/en-us/corporat…
Few people understand elite athletes as deeply as Fabrice Gautier.
He has spent decades working with some of the best athletes in the world. Over the past 18 months, he has also been a great advisor to Mastery, helping shape how our system understands and supports high performers.
1
2
89
We have spent a lot of time defining what Mastery believes.
The harder work is teaching Mastery how those beliefs should be applied to different people at different moments. A principle can be true and still produce the wrong response when applied without context.
Grit can help someone who quits when things get difficult. But it can deepen overtraining in someone who already refuses to recover.
Extreme ownership can help someone reclaim control. But it can intensify shame in someone who already believes everything is their fault.
“Do not settle for mediocrity” can wake someone up. But it can reinforce the belief that they will never be enough.
“Truth over comfort” can create a breakthrough. But it can also become permission for a coach to force its interpretation onto someone.
“Protect your signal” can create necessary boundaries. But it can reinforce avoidance in someone who needs to face a difficult conversation.
“Pressure is the path” can build capacity. But it can push someone whose system first needs to slow down and regulate.
None of these principles are wrong.
The risk comes from treating them as universally right.
The job of a coach is not to repeat its beliefs more forcefully. It is to understand the person well enough to know which belief serves them now.
That requires context.
Is this person avoiding discomfort, or have they been pushing beyond their limits for months?
Do they need to take more responsibility, or are they carrying responsibility that was never theirs?
Are they protecting themselves from distraction, or protecting themselves from the truth?
Do they need to be challenged, or do they need enough stability to hear the challenge?
The same words can strengthen one person and harm another. They can even do both to the same person at different points in their life.
This is one of the hardest parts of building Mastery.
It cannot simply identify a problem and retrieve the principle associated with it. It has to understand patterns across time, recognize what may already be overdeveloped, and treat its own interpretation as a hypothesis rather than a verdict.
Sometimes the right response is challenge.
Sometimes it is recovery.
Sometimes it is responsibility, perspective, regulation, or support.
The goal is not to build a system that always pushes harder.
It is to build one that understands what kind of strength the moment requires.
2
1
117
I'm literally just building every idea I had today instead of just putting it into Apple Notes
Open @conductor_build, create a new project, open a new branch, start on it... and it will be in reality shortly.
Some people have been contemplating an idea for years, maybe decades. Obsessing, attempting, discarding, agonizing, retrying.
Some of these ideas are unpopular, niche, impractical. Not obviously capitalizable. They live on in the inventor's mind.
In 2026, millions of these ideas will come to life thanks to superintelligent coding agents.
AI doesn't get tired. It amplifies the individual, and for better and sometimes for worse, it always takes you seriously. "Great idea. Splendid. Wow. You're absolutely right."
A world of digital wonders awaits us. This world will disproportionally favor the boldest ideas. Software that once seemed impossible will be one hyperlink away. I can't wait to see it.
On Friday afternoon someone connected me with their assistant to schedule a meeting.
I thought: I wonder if I can build an AI scheduling assistant that feels like looping an real person in from an iphone.
Four hours later: I wonder if I can build a COO agent with her own command custom center.
48 hours, 109 commits. 24,700 lines of code later — meet Gwynne. Named after the legendary Gwynne Shotwell of SpaceX. Gwynne is Mastery's new COO. She runs a 17-agent operation out of a custom command center grounded in the mission and OKRs. Org chart, agent builder, performance metrics, product analytics, full visibility across the operation.
She oversees agents leading four units — business development, growth and marketing, brand and copy, and research and intelligence — built to supplement and accelerate the work of our human team. So far she is running a tight ship.
Every agent gets walked through the Mastery system on onboarding — principles, values, what we're building, brand bible.
This am Gwynne brought on a senior AI engineer to work alongside our human engineering team. Together they'll be build out an agent engineering unit over the next week.
The gap between "I wonder if I can build that" and "here it is" has just about collapsed. Had a blast building and looking forward to the continued experiment.
4
3
145
The moment you start watching yourself perform, you've already left the performance.
There's a split second under pressure where attention shifts from the task to your evaluation of how you're doing at the task. Sounds subtle. The gap it creates isn't.
Elite performers aren't less nervous. They're less self-conscious. Attention stays external, on the read, the room, the next decision, instead of folding inward to monitor and protect their own image.
This is why confidence isn't the goal. Presence is.
Confidence is self-assessment. Presence is attention placement. You can be uncertain and still be fully in the moment. You cannot be fully in the moment while simultaneously auditing yourself.
Most performance problems that look like skill gaps are attention problems. The capability is there. The focus is just in the wrong place.
Where attention goes, performance follows.
Train the attention. The confidence takes care of itself.
1
61
A top MLB agent told me a story about a pitcher recently that stuck with me.
Not about mechanics.
Not about velocity.
About breathing.
One of his pitchers was on the edge of losing his spot in the big leagues.
A slump hit.
Negative thoughts before every start.
Anxiety walking to the mound.
Second guessing everything.
His nervous system was cooked.
Constant fight or flight.
The agent stepped in and hired a breathing coach.
Cost: $15,000.
Timeline: 4 months.
Just a simple, daily breathwork practice.
Slowly, everything changed.
He felt grounded again.
Calm in chaos.
Confident under pressure.
He trusted himself.
His performance transformed.
He pitched the best baseball of his career.
He later signed an $80M contract.
Same arm.
Same talent.
Different nervous system.
We still underestimate how much performance is driven by regulation, not motivation.
1
104
Peak performance doesn’t come from copying how others think.
It comes from understanding who we are.
Two people can face the same situation and need opposite things. One needs pressure to sharpen focus. Another needs calm to access clarity. One performs best with emotion. Another when grounded.
That’s why many blanket approaches fall apart.
Peak performance is when mind, body, and attention are aligned.
Effort feels fluid. Trust in self is high. Decisions feel simple. We’re fully engaged without forcing it.
The real work is learning our own unique formula for flow, then building a practice to enter that state on command.
58
The only separator between good and elite athletes is mental. We’re building an app to bridge that gap. @mastery.io is almost ready to go.
1
3
228














