I joined @edufeiok show in Argentina tonight to discuss the presidential election irregularities in Brazil that remain without explanation.

@FlavioBolsonaro registered 0 votes in 106 polling booths where Lula received 15,000 votes, literally 100% of the votes, according to @folha. In other words, in 106 polling booths Flavio received 0% and Lula 100%. The details are just barely starting to emerge…. Now, seriously, @LulaOficial for the good of Brazil you have to allow an independent examination with international observers of what happened during the Zanin Window. Refusing to do so will forever taint the reputation of Brazilian democracy. You shouldn’t let that happen.

The “Zanin Window” still deserves a transparent explanation. Whatever Flávio does next, his decisions cannot substitute for an independent examination of what happened on election night in Brazil. Lula’s former lawyer, now Supreme Court Justice @Cristianozaninm, ordered an unprecedented nationwide voting extension after some polling stations had already closed. The electoral authorities then temporarily suspended receipt of polling station tallies and national aggregation. In other words, they stopped the counting of votes for 2 hours after the counting started. That is the Zanin Window. Then came another extraordinary sequence. According to Brazilian reporting, the Federal Police issued a request to Alexandre de Moraes to seize Flávio’s passports and prevent him from leaving the country seven minutes after mathematical confirmation of Lula’s victory. Moraes granted the measures even though Flavio is not charged with any crime. Lula must agree to an independent technical audit with international participation and meaningful access. Reconcile original polling station tallies with published results. Examine system logs and operational changes, especially during the Zanin Window. Establish exactly where the extension operated and what happened during the interruption. Publish the methods, findings and limitations. An audit must be free to substantiate the result or identify discrepancies. It must have international observers. Otherwise it is a political exercise.

Democrat leaders today are praising support for communist Lula and his stolen election, just as they supported communists Hugo Chavez and Maduro in Venezuela and the Castro brothers in Cuba with their stolen elections. Democrats are telling you who they are. Believe them.

An international investigation must take place on the election in Brazil on the communist Lula regime. Flavio Bolsonaro just like his father had the election stolen from him after winning the first round and highly favored in the second round.

Explicado e desenhado:

Moments ago, @FlavioBolsonaro went to visit his father who remains under house arrest. When Flavio exited @jairbolsonaro’s home, several police officers were waiting for Flavio. According to Flavio, they served him with an order to surrender all his passports and informed him he is now banned from leaving the country. Flavio posted a video explaining this moments ago. instagram.com/reel/De-DJrDp4…

Thank you @DonaldJTrumpJr for recognizing this blatant Marxist takeover of Brasil. The Brazilian presidential election was stolen tonight from @FlavioBolsonaro and the Brazilian people. This election was not free, fair, or credible. Lula used malicious code and his corrupt militant Marxist judges @STF_oficial to interfere again in the elections. The Brazilian people want the election to be annulled and Lula put back in prison, where he belongs. Lula has damage Brazil and United States long enough! Brazil remains under a Marxist totalitarian judicial dictatorship, shown by tonight’s ridiculous election shenanigans and bogus results. Brazilians cannot vote out this corrupt cabal of judges who disrupt ballots to control elections. Lula and the Court are demonstrating to the world that Brazil is moving toward the model of Nicolás Maduro. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke. The time has come for the wicked and cowards to meet their reward. It is high time for good men to act.

Uma eleição estranha e com os bandidos a celebrar o resultado. Acho que os lulistas que estão em Portugal podiam fazer-nos o favor de voltar para o país onde acham que está tudo bem.

The most important question about STF Justice @Cristianozaninm last minute voting extension is what happened at each polling station. Venezuela offers a warning. On December 6, 2015, Venezuela’s electoral authority extended parliamentary voting by an hour. Opposition leaders accused it of giving Nicolas Maduro additional time to mobilize supporters at stations that should already have closed. Maduro’s opponents nevertheless won that election. And yet, Maduro stayed until his removal on January 3, 2026. In 2021, EU observers monitored closing at 51 Venezuelan polling stations. Only three had voters queuing at the legal deadline. Yet 48 closed late. Why does that matter? An extension changes the opportunity to participate. If some stations remain open while others have finished voting, voters can receive different opportunities depending on where they are registered. A campaign with better information and stronger local organization may be better positioned to exploit the additional time. Venezuela’s 2024 experience illustrates the deeper issue. The Carter Center found that precinct records collected by opposition observers showed González winning overwhelmingly, while electoral authorities announced Maduro’s victory without publishing the corresponding precinct results. The records helped expose the discrepancy. For Brazil, the questions that demand answers should therefore be concrete. Which stations remained open? When did each receive the extension order? Which had already closed? Were party observers present? What do the identification records, machine logs and station level tallies establish? Protecting access to the ballot and protecting confidence in the result require evidence that every voter was treated fairly.

👀👀👀

Quem pode acreditar numa palhaçada dessa?

.@FlavioBolsonaro:

A president’s former campaign lawyer has just intervened, this time as judge, in the rules governing that president’s reelection. The international community should understand the full history. @Cristianozaninm defended Lula in his many criminal cases. But Justice Zanin also represented Lula’s 2022 presidential campaign, receiving R$1.2 million for legal services. Reporting from that election describes Zanin coordinating the litigation against @jairbolsonaro before Brazil’s electoral court, the TSE. Lula subsequently appointed him to the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) as a reward for his service. Today, acting on a complaint from Lula about voter transport in three Bahia municipalities, Zanin initially ordered a two-hour extension of voting nationwide. The TSE later clarified that the extension applied only where voting had not already ended at 5 p.m. That creates two separate questions. First, impartiality. A former campaign lawyer exercising extraordinary authority over his former client’s reelection creates an obvious appearance of impartiality concern. Assignment by “lottery” does not answer whether he should participate. Second, equal treatment is a major problem. Once some stations have closed, a nationwide extension cannot give every voter the same additional opportunity. Zanin must explain why this remedy was necessary, why its scope was nationwide and how its uneven implementation was justified. The public deserves the full reasoning, the notification timeline and station level records showing where additional voting occurred.

According @malugaspar — not exactly considered a Flavio supporter — all the judges of the TSE oppposed granting the extension that Lula’s former campaign lawyer now turned STF justice @Cristianozaninm ordered. It’s Lula’s lawyer, sitting as judge in a court with no jurisdiction, ordering the polls remain open when all judges in the electoral court opposed it. This has to have consequences Lula is going to destroy the rule of law in Brazil on his way out.

@LulaOficial, a victory speech is not an explanation. Your former election lawyer, Justice Cristiano Zanin, extended voting by two hours and halted the counting of votes that had already commenced but closed machines stayed closed. Meanwhile, they halted the national tally and publication of results for those two hours. Brazil deserves a complete accounting of the 2 hours window that Zanin gave Lula as a gift. Which polling stations stayed open? How many additional people voted? Who authorized and implemented the pause? What do the original tally reports and system logs show? Preserve the records. Publish the data. Submit the process to independent scrutiny. These events demand answers. Until you have those the world cannot recognize this election.

🚨@FlavioBolsonaro says he will request annulment of the elections🚨 Full transcript to follow ASAP.

🇧🇷 Rio de janeiro today !!!!