Pinned Tweet
Replying to @ryangrim
Hakeem Jeffries refusing to even meet with incoming members while party leadership threatens their re-election is textbook cartel behavior. If demanding an end to endless war is a dealbreaker for leadership, the party infrastructure is fully captured.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
Replying to @clashreport
Notice not one word against the Iran War itself, just partisan slaps. Schumer isn't opposing foreign intervention…he's complaining about the PR handling. Bipartisan consensus stays protected behind partisan theater.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
***60%*** of Trump Media's revenue now comes from selling early access to the president's posts, according to the company's latest SEC filing.
Meanwhile House Dems spent $25 million to reelect Iran war supporter @JaredEMoskowitz and stuck him on the Foreign Affairs Committee
Multiple sources, Democratic and Republican strategists, tell @swin24 that Nixon and Jolly would have won if the Democrats invested in FL.
"All of them agreed – left or right – that Dems would have won in Florida, had the national powers-that-be put in more money and effort."
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
Iran cloned a sheep, launched its own satellites, mastered uranium enrichment, built most of its missile and drone arsenal domestically, manufactured 95% of its medicines domestically, and climbed into the world’s top 20 in scientific output, all under decades of brutal sanctions.
Yet people feel compelled to post videos of skimpily dressed Iranian women doing yoga and Pilates to convince the West that Iranians deserve dignity and shouldn’t be bombed.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
What Arab journalists and DC think tankers won’t cover:
Kenyan Domestic Worker Sentenced to 100 Lashes in Saudi Arabia nytimes.com/2026/11/10/world… via @NYTimes
Attributing domestic system failures to "Iranian cyber attacks" is pure institutional gaslighting. It's easier to sell a foreign villain than admit your own infrastructure is falling apart. The question is, why the false flag to Iran? Is it just to sanitize domestic decay, or to kill two birds with one stone? Then again, maybe Paris missed the memo on how well beating the Iran war drum worked out for the last U.S. administration at the midterms.
Unable to manage fridges let alone addressing grievances of its people, French government is shifting blame for its failures onto others.
Yes, Iran is powerful. But unlike France, we do not exercise power via support for massacres in Gaza or bombings of schools and hospitals.
6
154
The heavy defeat in the midterm elections was an unexpected blow to Trump's team. A combination of disarray, frustration, and confusion is now visible, and two main currents have formed: one around Vance's team and figures with electoral ambitions, seeking negotiation; and another, under pressure from Israeli lobbies and certain military circles, recommending the path of strike and confrontation.
A great struggle has begun in America. What is happening in Washington is not merely a tactical disagreement; it is a sign of the collapse of internal cohesion within Trump's team. A hidden competition to seize the pillars of power has taken shape, and some actors have focused all their energy on weakening rivals and controlling the policies of the Trump administration. Trump has become more uncertain about the consequences of a military attack, yet at the same time he is unable to produce a satisfactory option.
The issue visible in the Republicans' defeat is that the Republicans have only one chance to change the game for the 2028 presidential election; and that chance is nothing other than the defeat of Iran. So let us interpret it this way: to settle this matter, we must see whether the Islamic Republic of Iran remains or America comes first!
If the Islamic Republic remains, the unipolar world order collapses. If America emerges victorious, the globalist order collapses, Britain disintegrates, the European Union dissolves, and consequently NATO is finished. China will be forced to pay major concessions to America.
I noted earlier that the next round of battle is decisive; just as the round after this battle will be, and this is a recurring cycle. Who is the victor? The one who has shown resilience and survived
Trump's presence is more suitable for Iran, because within the threat itself lies a golden opportunity. When the Democrats were in power, they succeeded in managing the countries of the region that have their own security arrangements (Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, Oman, the Lebanese government, and current Syria) with Israel. For example, on October 7, one of the guarantors of Israel's survival were the globalists. Recall the visits of the presidents of France, Italy, Britain, Germany, and America to the occupied territories only one week after October 7; and they encouraged and enlisted the countries of the region in hidden assistance to Israel. However, the presence of the Democrats creates the possibility and the ground for a stronger coalition to be formed against Iran.
But Trump is a warmonger; he will attack Iran. However, the hidden policy of attacking Iran is to expel the globalists from the region and to secure absolute American domination over the Middle East. And this, while an existential threat to Iran, creates an opportunity; in the sense that there is no all-encompassing coalition in the region against Iran, because after Iran comes the turn of Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and so on. As you can see, Iran during Trump's time will have the possibility of scoring a strategic point against the globalists.
Trump has both lost the election and been humiliated in the Iran file; his counsel is scattered and full of disagreement. Iran awaits the enemy's scenario and responds preemptively. The next war, if it occurs, will not be limited; Iran's response will be broad, regional, and without time or geographic limits. The goal is strategic closure: sustainable restoration of deterrence, destruction of the infrastructure of American forces in the region, removal of the attack option from the table, and consolidation of Iran's control over the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab. Iran's strikes will be strategic and will turn the next war into an opportunity for a profound geopolitical transformation. The enemy will ultimately have no choice but to make concessions to Iran.1/3
Security developments are non-linear. Events cannot be viewed as a chain of inevitable steps. War has a timeline, but time itself has no inherent priority. What matters is access to tactical and strategic objectives. The optimal moment for an attack is the one that maximizes the probability of reaching those objectives. Therefore, if timelines shift, it does not necessarily mean the information was wrong; battlefield variables simply change the equation.
Why has no attack occurred so far? Iran has disrupted the enemy’s calculations; new variables have emerged; the objectives were not accessible; and the enemy has assessed the probability of failure and a heavy Iranian response as high. Iran is an active actor. By shaping the environment, it does not allow the enemy’s plan to materialize, because the next war, if it begins, must start under Iranian initiative.
The most important variable today is domestic politics in the United States and the Israeli regime. Trump can be constrained by the Democrats and by people of his own kind; Netanyahu can only be constrained by people of his own kind. Iran’s strategic focus on the US elections and the internal dynamics of the Israeli regime has been correct. The domestic scene in Israel today is unprecedented and is the product of Iranian resistance and fear of confrontation.
We are facing a decision to attack that has already been taken, yet is tied to momentary complexities and ambiguities. Once the electoral atmosphere passes, the political and media dimension will recede and the security issue will once again become primary. Pressure on Trump has increased; both houses of Congress are at risk, and files such as Epstein are on the table. Trump is looking for a quick and clean way to declare victory over Iran, but he does not have access to his objectives.
The sensitive window for the start of war is these very hours and days until November 4, and after that until the new Congress begins. The risk is serious. A joint attack scenario in the interval between the two elections is realistic. Netanyahu may postpone the attack to one or two days after the election; and if he loses, it is not unlikely that the United States will design an engagement that both gives Trump an achievement before November 4 and forces Eisenkot to accept a rotating premiership.
Iran is prepared for every scenario and has never been as ready as it is today. The enemy is under precise surveillance and initiative will not be lost. The next war will be long for the enemy; the enemy will be defeated in the first hours, yet will be unable to end the war, and Iran will continue it until a lasting achievement is secured.1/2
#IRANWAR
Nothing exposes the Iranian regime-change theater quite like watching the exact same 1,600 "monarchist" bot accounts temporarily pause their Iranian “freedom” campaign to farm votes for Likud. They aren’t the voice of 92 million Iranians living in Iran, nor are they even the voice of the broader Iranian diaspora….they’re just an Israeli PsyOp infrastructure reusing the exact same script. Turn off the bot farm for a second and the "Iranian diaspora consensus" completely collapses. Let’s face it. It was never an organic movement…just thousands of fake accounts running ops for Pahlavi by day and campaigning for Netanyahu by night. Embarrassing.
Israeli-linked network pushing restoration of Shah’s 'dynasty' exposed campaigning for Netanyahu
——
An investigative report published by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz has exposed a coordinated network of 1,653 X accounts posing as Iranian users that abruptly mobilized to campaign for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud party during Israel's recent parliamentary elections.
The investigation revealed striking digital overlaps, showing that the exact same cluster of accounts had previously been unmasked running inauthentic influence operations to promote Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's ousted shah, and manufacturing artificial grassroots support for regime change in Iran.
According to researchers, the network displayed clear technical indicators of inauthentic, automated coordination: accounts published identical phrasing in coordinated bursts, amplified Likud messaging within minutes of each other, and executed a sharp pivot from Persian-language propaganda targeting Tehran to Hebrew appeals demanding that Israeli citizens vote for Netanyahu.
Multiple profiles claimed to speak on behalf of the Iranian public, arguing that Netanyahu's political survival was vital for toppling the Islamic Republic. Once voting concluded, the accounts dropped domestic Israeli politics entirely and reverted to pushing pro-monarchist talking points.
Digital rights groups note that this operation builds upon prior exposures. A major October 2025 investigation by Citizen Lab uncovered an extensive Israeli-backed influence network utilizing AI-generated deepfakes and automated avatars to manufacture domestic unrest inside Iran, with messaging frequently synchronized with Israeli aggression.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
This world truly does not deserve the beauty and the grace of the Iranian people.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
JD Vance is beginning the project to launder himself as the epic based anti-war candidate, and his best friend Tucker Carlson will be a key asset in that project. He will use his pseudo-radical status he built up over the past year to promote Vance as the epic anti-war, anti-Israel candidate. In reality JD Vance is the creation of Peter CIA-Mossad asset Thiel (also good friends with Tucker Carlson and his clique like Darryl Cooper), and their project has always been to pretend their Republican candidates are not the same as the Republicans of old, as George Bush and his neocons. Instead, they are based nationalist Republicans, they are America First Republicans, they are isolationist, they don't like foreign wars, they don't like Israel, they're just red-blooded epic Americans who love America and Americans and white Americans especially.
Trump was their main vehicle for this but now he's worn out and done. They rode him into the Iran war, their cherished prize dream for decades, and he's now totally useless to them, a lame duck who is termed out. They need their next candidate, and Vance is their choice.
Every single thing Tucker Carlson has done over the past year on Israel will be an asset he will use to make sure this new project will work and convince enough people that it's genuine.
Vance's elevation means the continuation of Zionist Jewish supremacist hegemony on the Republican conservative side of the political spectrum.
Meanwhile on the Democrat liberal side they will anoint Jon Ossoff. He is their chosen one. He too will start making more Israel critical noises, but always staying safely within the J-Street proscribed lines. And they will find people like Tucker to launder him too to the base. People with credibility. You will soon see them appear and start laundering and promoting him, to ensure Zionist Jewish supremacist hegemony remains intact on that side of the spectrum too.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
Iran has a MASSIVE Anti-Trump Protest Erupts in Tehran’s Revolution Square
Protesters set fire to a GIANT mural depicting Donald Trump, JD Vance, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Steve Witkoff.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
Replying to @tparsi
What we all needed was a charismatic Muslim politician who actually knows how to land punchy headlines against AIPAC… Excellent work taking the fight directly to them.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
The victory of Abdul El-Sayed in the Senate race in Michigan is extremely important and symbolic.
Abdul ran a strong anti-war campaign, constantly (and correctly) linking the US war against Iran to the rising cost of living and high gasoline and food prices. He emphasized that that money should be spent on social programs, not war.
Abdul also staunchly supported Palestine and refused to give in to relentless attacks by pro-Israel groups. Trump and the Republicans desperately resorted to extreme Islamophobia and racism, smearing him as a "terrorist". And it didn't work.
This victory further demonstrates that wars and Israel are now absolutely toxic issues in US politics.
The only reason Trump won the 2024 election is because the Biden-Harris administration was very unpopular and he deceived Americans into believing two main things:
1, he would bring down prices, following sky-high inflation; and
2, he would stop waging wars.
Trump blatantly lied about both.
Inflation in the US keeps rising. Gasoline prices have skyrocketed (due to Trump's wars). Food is expensive. Housing costs are out of control. Healthcare is a disaster. But Trump only cares about the stock market and AI data centers.
Meanwhile, Trump launched a war of aggression against Iran, continued sponsoring Israel's genocide in Gaza, bombed Yemen, invaded Venezuela, and blockaded Cuba, while waging nonstop trade war and failing to stop the proxy war in Ukraine.
Let's be clear here: the Democrats' overwhelming victory in the midterm is not because Americans suddenly love the Democratic Party. In fact, DNC leadership has mostly sat on its hands and has done very little to oppose Trump's destructive oligarchic agenda.
Rather, this overwhelming victory represents the people's overwhelming rejection of US wars, Israel, and a government that only cares about Big Tech corporate oligarchs.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
Here's the real reason Trump announced that we're "cutting aid to Israel":
They plan is to effectively merge the IDF with our military through a provision in the NDAA, allowing the Israelis to help themselves on what we pay for without any of us knowing about it. We pay, they take advantage.
This has the additional downside of our "ally," which loves to spy on us, to do even more of it.
They think you're stupid.. Don't fall of it. We need to decouple from Israel and not play these games.
Don't fall for the narrative that Washington is being "manipulated" into war. Israel is a genocide state, but regional proxies don't direct imperial strategy….they execute U.S. objectives and absorb the public relations fallout. Documented policy for over a decade explicitly outlines strategies for using proxies like Israel to take the blame for U.S.-led escalation against Iran. The imperial state ALWAYS owns its wars.
🇺🇸🇮🇱 WARNING!!! US Media is Setting up the "Israel Did It!" or "Israel Made the US Do It!" Narrative Regarding Attacks (including NUCLEAR attacks) on Iran
Tucker Carlson, who has played cognitive infiltrator/manipulator like his US government-employed father before him, claims "Israel" is pressuring the US to nuke Iran and is sharing intel with the US on Iran.
This is a dangerous means of trying to distance/absolve the US of its own crimes worldwide and fits into STATED US policy regarding shifting blame for US wars of aggression against Iran specifically.
"Israel did it" or "Israel made us do it!"
Here is reality:
1. Israel depends 100% on the US to exist day to day, and to conduct any major military operation. If the US stopped supporting Israel, it would cease to exist. Conversely, the US has pursued empire and war worldwide before Israel ever existed and will continue to so even if Israel disappeared tomorrow;
2. Israel depends on US intel capabilities ONLY the US has, not the other way around. Israeli intel - like Ukraine's - is an extension of US capabilities;
3. Israeli lobbying in Washington accounts for less than 1% of all US lobbying, used to launder political blame in the same way Israeli armed aggression does so militarily - it does not have the ability to pressure or manipulate the US into doing anything anymore than one's hand can pressure or direct the actions of one's mind and body;
4. Carlson mentioned Israel's meaningless elections as a "factor" - no, no matter who won, just like in US elections, nothing would change, least of all Israel's role as America's forward operating base in the region (just as it hasn't changed this entire 21st century);
5. US policy papers have explicitly laid out strategies to use Israel to both provoke and take the blame/retaliation for AMERICAN war on Iran. The 2009 Brookings paper "Which Path to Persia" has a whole chapter dedicated to this strategy!
6. If the US attacks or nukes Iran or anyone else - it's because the US wanted to and it will use all its proxies to either help and/or take the blame - do NOT fall for the propaganda used to facilitate this STATED strategy!
7. And no, just because the US is 100% responsible for its actions AND the actions of its proxies, it does not absolve any of its proxies - including Israel - for their roles in US crimes against humanity.
If a man uses his hand to commit a crime, his whole body, including his hand, goes to jail for it.
Finally - whether Carlson is doing this to deliberately assist with stated US policy for shifting blame for its own global crimes against humanity, or he is doing this out of pure incompetence and/or ignorance - the outcome is exactly the same - misleading his huge audience and selling them a lie US policymakers themselves have admitted they are telling the public.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
🇺🇸🇮🇱 WARNING!!! US Media is Setting up the "Israel Did It!" or "Israel Made the US Do It!" Narrative Regarding Attacks (including NUCLEAR attacks) on Iran
Tucker Carlson, who has played cognitive infiltrator/manipulator like his US government-employed father before him, claims "Israel" is pressuring the US to nuke Iran and is sharing intel with the US on Iran.
This is a dangerous means of trying to distance/absolve the US of its own crimes worldwide and fits into STATED US policy regarding shifting blame for US wars of aggression against Iran specifically.
"Israel did it" or "Israel made us do it!"
Here is reality:
1. Israel depends 100% on the US to exist day to day, and to conduct any major military operation. If the US stopped supporting Israel, it would cease to exist. Conversely, the US has pursued empire and war worldwide before Israel ever existed and will continue to so even if Israel disappeared tomorrow;
2. Israel depends on US intel capabilities ONLY the US has, not the other way around. Israeli intel - like Ukraine's - is an extension of US capabilities;
3. Israeli lobbying in Washington accounts for less than 1% of all US lobbying, used to launder political blame in the same way Israeli armed aggression does so militarily - it does not have the ability to pressure or manipulate the US into doing anything anymore than one's hand can pressure or direct the actions of one's mind and body;
4. Carlson mentioned Israel's meaningless elections as a "factor" - no, no matter who won, just like in US elections, nothing would change, least of all Israel's role as America's forward operating base in the region (just as it hasn't changed this entire 21st century);
5. US policy papers have explicitly laid out strategies to use Israel to both provoke and take the blame/retaliation for AMERICAN war on Iran. The 2009 Brookings paper "Which Path to Persia" has a whole chapter dedicated to this strategy!
6. If the US attacks or nukes Iran or anyone else - it's because the US wanted to and it will use all its proxies to either help and/or take the blame - do NOT fall for the propaganda used to facilitate this STATED strategy!
7. And no, just because the US is 100% responsible for its actions AND the actions of its proxies, it does not absolve any of its proxies - including Israel - for their roles in US crimes against humanity.
If a man uses his hand to commit a crime, his whole body, including his hand, goes to jail for it.
Finally - whether Carlson is doing this to deliberately assist with stated US policy for shifting blame for its own global crimes against humanity, or he is doing this out of pure incompetence and/or ignorance - the outcome is exactly the same - misleading his huge audience and selling them a lie US policymakers themselves have admitted they are telling the public.
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
We should have paid much closer attention when Norman Finkelstein supported the CIA-led covert war on Syria, Operation Timber Sycamore, while repeatedly portraying Hezbollah’s intervention against al-Qaeda and ISIS as “unacceptable” because Assad had no “legitimacy”, which, conveniently, was also Obama’s favorite talking point.
Finkelstein even claimed that Nasrallah had made a “historic misjudgment” by intervening in Syria.
Well, Syria is now carved up between Israeli and Turkish occupation, exactly as Nasrallah warned would happen if the Syrian state collapsed. Jolani sits in Damascus, collaborates openly with the United States, and his regime wants to openly normalize with Israel while Syria’s sovereignty is being shredded in front of everyone.
So who made the historic misjudgment?
Nasrallah, who warned that the fall of Syria would open the door to foreign occupation and the destruction of the resistance axis?
Or Finkelstein, who repeated the same “Assad has no legitimacy” framing used by the people running the regime-change operation?
And why, up until this very moment, does Finkelstein refuse to seriously confront the Turkish-Zionist takeover of Syria and the Jolani regime’s collaboration with Washington?
Being right about Palestine does not give anyone a free pass on Syria.
On Syria, Finkelstein was catastrophically wrong.
Is Norman Finkelstein deteriorating with age or has he always been a closet supremacist?
I am shocked to listen to his deep-seated, ideologically anchored defence of racism in general & Zionist apartheid in particular.
He has 2nd clip revealing his hidden rage at immigrant poor of New York using their food stamps to eat salmon, while he tries saving ten cents shopping for cheapest tin of beans!
Farnaz Wallace retweeted
Replying to @HormuzLetter
This is what happens when corporate cost-cutting trumps basic infrastructure common sense. Plug essential cold-chain systems straight into the open web to save a few bucks on manual logging, then act shocked when the whole inventory gets defrosted by an adversary. Brilliant.
Power outage in DC hits the State Department, World Bank, and IMF after a basic substation failure. We burn trillions on foreign interventions and threatening total obliteration of Iran & adversaries, but leave zero margin for domestic grid security. Brilliant policies….Backup generators powering Washington's diplomatic and financial hubs is the reality of an empire prioritized on threat theater.


































