Eso es cierto. Esos árboles son para plazas, parques y bulevares, de lo contrario levantarían mucho pavimento.
Para avenidas y calles son mejores los guayacanes y los mangos (ojo, las caobas suelen dar raíces profundas).
Un experto en botánica ayudaría mucho más en el tema.
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
El que diga que Venezuela está condenada al fracaso, no conoce su potencial.
Tenemos casi 40 millones de hectáreas de puro llano para desarrollar, ríos navegables de gran calado para sacar la producción y casi 4.000 km de costas. Infraestructura cómo carreteras asfaltadas y electricidad a recuperar, ingenio e innovación para generar riqueza y las ganas de trabajar y producir para comenzar a tener una buena calidad de vida, poner a Venezuela en el lugar que se merece y disfrutar de lo nuestro.
VAMOS A HACERLO...!!!
Te sumas?
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
El mundo contra ti: eso te hace hombre. Tú a pesar del mundo: eso es ser hombre.
Las únicas víctimas son las mujeres y los niños. ¿Dignidad? Salir con sangre y lágrimas del hueco. Cero mariquismo.
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
El trigo de las Pastas es 100% importado. El maíz Blanco un 30 % importado. El arroz el 25% es importado. El 75% del maíz del de pollo, huevos, cerdos y embutidos, el 100 % d la soja de los mismos productos también.
Empaquetar no es producción nacional.
🟡#EnVideo | En entrevista para Argumentos con @rosa_periodista, el presidente de la Asociación Nacional de Supermercados y Autoservicios (ANSA), Ítalo Atencio, destacó que actualmente, el 90% de los productos que se encuentran en los supermercados venezolanos son de fabricación nacional o ensamblados en el país, mientras que el 10% restante es importado.
Imagina una ciudad llena de estos árboles formidables, esplendorosos, coloridos.
Vivir rodeado de esto automáticamente mejora tu calidad de vida.
Qué arbolito más cursi y más marico, la verdad.
¿A quién se le ocurre sembrar estas vainas en una ciudad que se está sobresancochando como tapa de olla de mondongo?
La chavería escoñetadora con alma desértica va a dejar Caracas como un peladero de chivo. Es un deber patriótico sembrar lo que sea. Árboles, matas, arbustos.
Eso, o estos cosplays de beduinos nos van a dejar el país como un Sahara quemado para sentirse a gusto.
Llegará el día en el que Caracas sea reforestada con apamates, ceibas, samanes. Incluso mangos. Árboles serios.
La palmera, en la ciudad, es el "árbol" más inútil que existe. No da sombra, es delicada, es fea, no sirve para un carajo.
Urbanista que quiera sembrar palmeritas pajúas tiene que ser procesado por traición a la patria y empalado en una vaina de ésas.
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
Trusting JD Vance was the biggest mistake of Trump's presidency. The writing was on the wall.
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
Parece que todavía no se dio cuenta que él es uno de los principales arquitectos de la derrota, por no decir el principal.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
Representante María Elvira Salazar:
"El voto hispano castigó la deportación indiscriminada de latinos trabajadores, no delincuentes; sumado a la baja economía"
“… la gente te pasa la cuenta y tienen razón”
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
Mr. Vice-President,
Please allow me to present a different perspective.
The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire.
If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it – otherwise don’t start it.
This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism.
Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or won’t we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency.
In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue.
No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision.
Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didn’t last, didn’t work and left us in no man’s land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed.
Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon.
No, Mr. Vice President. It’s not the war. It’s the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Giorgio Emiliani retweeted
Lo que pasó ayer en EEUU, demuestra que todavía funciona la democracia.
Incumplió 4 vainas fundamentales por las que la gente votó por el.
No me meto en más guerras.
Voy a bajar los precios.
Voy a bajar y balancear el presupuesto.
Voy a controlar a las grandes empresas.
Voy a “acabar” con la corrupción de los demócratas.
El Catire llegó a guisar en banda y los ciudadanos sintieron que se burlaron de ellos, llegó a guisar como si fuese un país de latam. Inside trading, los hijos, el yerno. Y la gente se lo cobró.
Elon con todo su billete, no pudo comprar los candidatos y los resultados de varios estados, especialmente Texas.
Datico: Elon gastó más dinero en estas elecciones que lo que Soros ha gastado en toda la historia.
Lo que pasó es tan grave para los MAGAS, que varios estados rojos históricos se voltearon y votaron en contra del Catire, que por cierto NO es republicano. Yo diría más bien que es un populista de derecha. Los republicanos tradicionales se lo cobraron.
Me preocupa que todo esto puede arrastrar pal fondo a Rubio y distraerlo de los 3 pasos para Venezuela, ademas de que era una opción para 2028.
Con respecto a Venezuela, quiero creer que estos resultados no nos perjudican. Venezuela es un tema bipartidista y todavía está María Elvira y Rick Scott que son grandes aliados de Maria Corina.
Quiero creer que esto nos va a ayudar a que se definan una elecciones muy pronto. Espero que los demócratas presionen para que hayan unas elecciones lo antes posible. Venezuela podría ser uno de los pocos logros buenos que pueda vender esta administración y podría ser un caso de éxito de Rubio específicamente, pero hay que meterle transparencia al asunto, por ejemplo comenzar a mostrar los contratos petroleros.