I didn’t want to post this publicly, but I feel I need to share my experience and ask for clarification from @fundingpips. @fundingpips has raised a reverse-trading concern regarding my accounts, which resulted in the closure of my 2 × $100K Master accounts, 1 Phase account, and multiple other accounts. I traded around 160 trades across 23 accounts using the same strategy. The evidence shared with me refers to one trade, but I noticed several differences: • Entry timing differs by ~12 minutes • Exit timing differs by ~5 minutes • Entry and exit prices are also different • The trade was on 28 August, while that account breached on 2 September • I received the email of this allegation on 22 September I have asked for the complete evidence and methodology behind the decision. However, after four replies, I received essentially the same response: that the decision is final and that the provided trade is sufficient proof. I have already attached the details showing the differences in the evidence. @Khldfx is a trader, and was built by traders, for traders. I chose @fundingpips because I believed it was a firm that understood and supported traders. I hope this situation can be reviewed with the same transparency and fairness that traders expect. I have received around $25,000 in payouts from FundingPips. I genuinely want to understand one thing: if a trader becomes profitable but isn’t an influencer or public figure, does that become a concern for the firm? Because the trades provided as evidence do not match in timing or price in a way that, from my side, explains the decision that was made. I’m also willing to participate in an interview and explain how I trade, my strategy, and every detail of my trading activity. I’m sharing this publicly because I believe traders deserve clarity when serious decisions are made about their accounts.