Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed) header
Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed) profile picture

Fysica, eco & rechten @KU_Leuven. Political and Public Sector Ninja @de_NVA en @EYnews. Vloeiend in het wetstratees, legalees en consultees. X’t in eigen naam.

Joined October 2012
Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)Photo by Ismail C. Ayed (@ismailayed)
Ik herinner iedereen graag aan de chaos die de @openvld heeft achtergelaten. Werkelijk de laatste oppositiepartij van wie de nieuwe regering lessen te krijgen heeft. Als het de komende jaren pijn zal doen, is het door ondoortastendheid van @alexanderdecroo en partijgenoten.
10
35
2
227
10,111
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
Toch wel. De partij Anders noemt dat "voltooid leven" en ging nog 'n pakje verder in haar voorstellen.
12
5
1
21
2,595
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
"We moeten oppassen voor het mensenrechtelijk activisme in en rond Brussel, dat kan behoorlijk hevig en ongegrond zijn." @Koen_Geens1 over de kritiek op de wet op woonstbetredingen in #deafspraakopvrijdag
5
7
34
5,807
Net zoals voor ‘controversiële’ vonnissen en arresten, geldt in dit geval voor zogenaamd ‘inhumane’ wetgeving het adagium: eerst lezen dan pas zaniken. De gelijkenis met ICE gaat niet alleen niet op - ze is ridicuul. Sterk legistiek werk, @anneleen_vb.
Na jarenlange politieke tegenstand en desinformatie treedt de wet op de woonstbetredingen binnenkort eindelijk in werking. Toch kondigen heel wat burgemeesters nu al aan dat ze niet willen meewerken. Mijn boodschap aan hen is duidelijk 👇
2
2
16
694
Lees de *cumulatief* geldende voorwaarden waaraan een *onderzoeksrechter* toetst en maak nadien nog maar wat van uw tak. Dit is billijk, broodnodig - maar tegelijk ook geen wonderoplossing. We moeten in één beweging blijven inzetten op terugkeerakkoorden. Hetgeen Anneleen doet.
1
1
3
268
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
When you listen to James Talarico, you realize that last night's results were not just a rejection of Trump and Israel's Iran war, but also a rejection of a Democratic Party led by people like Biden, Blinken, and Sullivan: "I've never taken money from AIPAC, and I'm not taking money from AIPAC in this campaign. Seeing what's happening in Gaza makes me sick to my stomach as a teacher, as a Christian, as a human being" This is his message, and he won in Texas!
477
5,658
375
21,469
967,475
Zionisten en Pahlavisten zijn dan ook - op de keper beschouwd - vaak niet de meest intelligente wezens op deze aardbol.
Nancy Mace reveals her geography ignorance: ‘I’ve been to the border where I could touch Libya or be right next to Syria’
125
Ik kan er nog altijd niet bij dat Zelensky deze zottin met grote égards heeft ontvangen.
138 Laura Loomer posts in the past 24 hours. New case study for psychoanalysts.
2
222
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
We mogen niet de fout maken de resultaten v #Midterms26 te beschouwen als een ideologische ruk naar links in de VS. Ongeveer 50% vd kiezers gebruikte de verkiezingen als een gelegenheid om zich tegen #Trump uit te spreken. De Dems hebben in 2028 nog altijd een goed verhaal nodig.
3
3
32
1,232
🥱
Een N-VA'er moet uiteraard geen fan zijn van Donald Trump. Maar een N-VA'er die de overwinning viert van een rits uiterst linkse Democraten , begrijpt het niet of is niet rechts. Heel wat Republikeinen die inhoudelijk veel meer lijken op Bart De Wever dan op Donald Trump verloren hun zetel. Ik vermoed dat veel N-VA'ers nog steeds denken dat de Democratische Partij een soort van centrumlinkse partij is in een centrumrechts land. Centristen dus, naar Belgische maatstaven. Dat is niet zo. Dit zijn niet de jaren '90. De meerderheid van de Democraten die deze nacht hun zetel wonnen, zijn linkser dan coalitiepartner Vooruit. Een stuk linkser. Vermogensbelastingen, open grenzen, all the fun stuff. Als N-VA'er déze Democratische Partij vieren is zo'n beetje als uit je dak gaan omdat Groen wint. We zullen het maar toeschrijven aan onwetendheid. Want het alternatief is erger.
4
445
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
Vance posting as if he’s an online pundit or commentator and not the vice-president in the administration that launched this war and then defended this war.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
361
5,794
58
70,958
675,937
Vance benoemt voor het eerst expliciet de Voldemort in dit hele Republikeinse verkiezingsdebacle en één van de belangrijkste oorzaken van dit gênante historische electorale verlies: de staat Israël. Introspectie in de politiek. Het bestaat zowaar.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
2
139
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
NOPE.
It’s time to move beyond the foreign aid model with Israel. It’s time for a joint venture to win the century. This is where President Trump can steer the relationship over the next two years. Re-upping based on this morning’s comments. nationalreview.com/2026/10/i…
116
631
8
7,576
108,582
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
Netanyahu says Texas is two weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon
417
14,190
511
183,261
2,523,702
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
STFU. No one wants to hear a word from you. Your beloved Iran War lost seats everywhere. Devastating night. Devastating losses. Devastating for our country. Devastating for the hard-working American who can’t afford to buy a home, or fill their tank with gas or put food on the table.
Looks like every issue anyone can imagine is being used as the basis for the midterm loss, apart from historical trends. See the link as one example: pbs.org/newshour/politics/ap… That said, some big issues can be separated from the rest. I will address all of this tomorrow, including the economy, affordability, demographics/immigration, Iran, the Woke Reich, and more. We need to get this right, and we need to get ready for the battles ahead with the Democrats, who are committed to taking a wrecking ball to our country.
953
569
68
7,356
244,028
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
Tonight’s outcome isn’t about placing faith in Democrats or socialist principles; it’s about holding Republicans accountable for betraying their promises. All Republicans had to do was: 1. put Americans First 2. not start another war 3. prosecute sex traffickers
6,688
29,119
1,985
202,368
3,672,763
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
These halfwits have a lot to answer for.
Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro agree that Americans don't care about the Iran War and it won't have any effect on the midterms. 🤡
605
1,692
38
20,382
451,054
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
🇺🇸💙
626
3,503
163
29,638
294,209
Ismail C. Ayed retweeted
Congratulations to Sen. @JeffMerkley in Oregon! Standing against genocide is good policy and good politics! #ORSEN
9
205
1
1,223
15,816