Adewole John

Suella Braverman, Englishness cannot be reduced to ancestry or bloodlines. Patriotism is demonstrated through loyalty, service, sacrifice and contribution to a nation. Would you look into the eyes of the children and grandchildren of those who fought and died defending Britain during the Second World War, including soldiers from former British colonies, and tell them they can never be English because of their ancestry? If Jude Bellingham can wear the England shirt, represent the nation with pride and bring honour to its people, on what moral basis do you question his English identity? You are entitled to define your own identity, but you have no moral authority to define someone else’s. And herein lies the disturbing implication of this far-right obsession with bloodlines: an Englishman who betrays his country would seemingly have a greater claim to belonging than an immigrant who lays down his life defending it. What a perverse definition of patriotism! The irony is that the same voices demanding that immigrants integrate and demonstrate loyalty are often the first to deny them belonging, regardless of how much they contribute or sacrifice. A nation is not merely inherited through blood; it is also built through sacrifice, strengthened through service and sustained through belonging. History remembers those who stood for a country, not merely those who claimed ancestral ownership of it. If blood matters more than loyalty, then what you are defending is not patriotism, but ancestry disguised as patriotism.

This is precisely why I find it troubling how easily some people are led by misinformation without bothering to establish the facts. Fact-check yourself before making such bold claims. Dependants of foreign care workers on Health and Care Worker visas are generally subject to No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF). They cannot ordinarily claim Universal Credit, Child Benefit or most other public benefits. I understand that, for some people, the narrative is driven less by facts and more by hostility towards immigrants. But prejudice does not become truth simply because it is repeated confidently. If this is a “documented fact”, produce the evidence. Otherwise, stop presenting misinformation as fact.

Immigrants are human beings with ambitions, qualifications, families, and aspirations. They are not commodities imported to serve a particular industry indefinitely. There is also a glaring contradiction in your argument. On the one hand, you suggest that migrants will become dependent on benefits after obtaining permanent residency. On the other hand, you express concern that they will leave care work for better employment opportunities. Which exactly is your objection? If someone leaves the care sector to become a solicitor, accountant, engineer, or another highly skilled professional, they are still working, paying taxes, contributing to the economy, and potentially earning more. Surely, that is something any country interested in economic growth should welcome. You cannot simultaneously complain that migrants might become economically inactive and then oppose their efforts to become more economically productive. That is not a coherent policy argument; it is a glaring double standard. If the government wishes to retain skilled care workers, it should create an environment where remaining in the sector is a desirable choice, not an imposed obligation. A fair society does not measure the worth of immigrants solely by how long they remain in the jobs they were originally recruited to perform. It also recognises their right to grow, contribute, and fulfil their potential. The real question should be: Why are we discussing how to prevent care workers from leaving instead of asking why the sector struggles to retain them in the first place? You cannot build a sustainable care system by restricting people’s ambitions. You build it by making care work a profession people are proud to choose and financially able to remain in. Retention should be earned through dignity, fair pay, and opportunity I know you are inconsequential in the scheme of things however Do unto others as you would have them do unto you

Se O fe Dan ogun wo ni?

Middle class life is crazy, one mistake you are back to zero. The need to be smart can’t be overemphasised

Tough skin ' A Trauma Child code🖤

Let assume that the possibilities were 1. Most places on earth were definitely not habited then 2.Concept of continent is a recent development 3.For the mere fact that he built a boat and he warned people around , definitely it is a localized event as he only could have warn people around him 4.definitely other part of the world could not be known to people of Noah’s region hence they would refer to themselves as the only people living then Your thoughts?

Transportation business is profitable , you only get cheated when you refuse to involve lawyers in the agreement and not putting necessary clauses also in the agreement . The last time I put out a car on hire purchase I inserted a clause in the agreement that says upon two instance of default I automatically have the right to get my car back without dispute I.e foreclosing any right to litigate on it on the part of the driver -The harsher youare the safer you would be-

What does the NURTW officials in Lagos do apart from parties and owambe ..politicians no enjoy reach them! Hmmm

Di kulet divorce saga Can we say The guy is PROBABLY sleeping with Mummy favor or not? The b:astar'd even admitted on video that he defile minors

I think BAT is not letting fake news purveyors slide

Questions to ask anyone propagating sharia law in South west including my colleague 1. Would the Sharia law proposed for the South West be identical to the version practiced in the North, If NO, then what kind of sharia is the one proposed 2.People disobey conventional court and we know the punishment ,now Sharia court in question what would be the punitive measures?are we go have have canings /lashes or even amputations 3.due to inter-religious nature of the south west are you saying a Christian parent should not be concerned with his children who are Moslems being taken to sharia court or Christian children with Moslem parent? 4. In an era where criminal justice systems are shifting towards rehabilitative approaches, would punitive measures under Sharia law align with the global trend and the Yoruba adage of (ti a ba fi owo osi , ba omo wi , ama fi owo tun fa mo ra) spanking with the left hand and consoling with the right hand. In situations where we have instance of people getting amputated in sharia states 5. In a case involving a business dispute between a Muslim and a Christian, which court would have jurisdiction—the Sharia court or a secular court like the magistrate? How would conflicts between these courts be resolved? In case you say the sharia court is only for marriages or business 6 Would Sharia law apply equally to Muslims and non-Muslims in shared public spaces or business environments, or would there be separate systems? 7. How would cases of interfaith marriages or disputes involving non-Muslims be handled under Sharia law? 8. Sharia law has specific gender-based prescriptions, particularly regarding inheritance, testimony, and marital roles. How would these align with the South West’s push for gender equality and women’s rights? 9. Would traditional courts and customary laws become subordinate to Sharia law? 10. Who would oversee the implementation and enforcement of Sharia law in the South West? Would it be the same Hisbah structure as in the North, or would new systems need to be established? 11. Would Sharia court rulings conflict with federal laws or decisions made in secular courts? 12. Whose taxpayer fund would be required to fund the implementation of Sharia law? If any sympathizer of sharia law cannot answer this questions honestly , I would tell you confidently the south west would be worst than Lebanon when the blood shed 🩸 would start

Questions to ask anyone propagating sharia law in South west including my colleague 1. Would the Sharia law proposed for the South West be identical to the version practiced in the North, If NO, then what kind of sharia is the one proposed 2.People disobey conventional court and we know the punishment ,now Sharia court in question what would be the punitive measures?are we go have have canings /lashes or even amputations 3.due to inter-religious nature of the south west are you saying a Christian parent should not be concerned with his children who are Moslems being taken to sharia court or Christian children with Moslem parent? 4. In an era where criminal justice systems are shifting towards rehabilitative approaches, would punitive measures under Sharia law align with the global trend and the Yoruba adage of (ti a ba fi owo osi , ba omo wi , ama fi owo tun fa mo ra) spanking with the left hand and consoling with the right hand. In situations where we have instance of people getting amputated in sharia states 5. In a case involving a business dispute between a Muslim and a Christian, which court would have jurisdiction—the Sharia court or a secular court like the magistrate? How would conflicts between these courts be resolved? In case you say the sharia court is only for marriages or business 6 Would Sharia law apply equally to Muslims and non-Muslims in shared public spaces or business environments, or would there be separate systems? 7. How would cases of interfaith marriages or disputes involving non-Muslims be handled under Sharia law? 8. Sharia law has specific gender-based prescriptions, particularly regarding inheritance, testimony, and marital roles. How would these align with the South West’s push for gender equality and women’s rights? 9. Would traditional courts and customary laws become subordinate to Sharia law? 10. Who would oversee the implementation and enforcement of Sharia law in the South West? Would it be the same Hisbah structure as in the North, or would new systems need to be established? 11. Would Sharia court rulings conflict with federal laws or decisions made in secular courts? 12. Whose taxpayer fund would be required to fund the implementation of Sharia law? If any sympathizer of sharia law cannot answer this questions honestly , I would tell you confidently the south west would be worst than Lebanon when the blood shed 🩸 would start