Highly regarded. npub1j555l6gcq5cy7zd0juvau8mt03a3n6ufch7ku9smnwgqhdsp360srz2kqs
Joined October 2019
- Tweets1.2K
- Following2.3K
- Followers230
- Likes46.9K
Roy Donk retweeted
⚠️PARENTS BEWARE⚠️ pedophiles are using these figurines to signal their identity to each other in plain sight. Each one represents a victim.
Roy Donk retweeted
Seinfeld Bitcoin Highlights 🎬₿
A montage of all the Seinfeld Bitcoin clips so far!
If you’ve been enjoying them, please retweet and follow. More on the way.
Roy Donk retweeted
WAIT... so you're telling me @Nic_carter doesn't hold any bitcoin UTXOs, only owns BTC exposure through ETFs, yet he's been the loudest voice pushing quantum forks that freeze other people's UTXOs?
Dude can fuck off.
Excellent essay from @nic_carter on bitcoin maximalism as an unfalsifiable apocalyptic cult. Bitcoin is still king, but the accreted cultural and religious nonsense is embarrassing and discardable. Discard it.
murmurationstwo.substack.com…
Roy Donk retweeted
“It’s nootropic interstellar-travel-as-a-service with a strong moat”
🤖 Made with AI
Imagine being @JohnCarreyrou and having to publish your shitty piece early in preparation for getting mogged by the @findingsatoshi_ film.
Roy Donk retweeted
I worked with Adam Back at Blockstream for four years.
Just finished the NYT piece.
I don't have anything useful to say about whether he's Satoshi as I genuinely don't know.
What I can tell you is that the obsession with finding Satoshi is a journalism problem, not a Bitcoin problem.
Legacy media needs a protagonist.
Someone to put on the cover, someone to interview, someone to "hold accountable"
That's how they process the world.
Personally I like Adam.
But whether he's Satoshi or not changes nothing about how bitcoin works tomorrow morning.
The protocol doesn't care. The network doesn't care. The next block DOES NOT care.
Every Satoshi investigation tells you more about the outlet doing the investigating than about bitcoin itself.
The NYT needs this story waaay more than bitcoin does.
But hey, really cool Matrix-style photo though.
Roy Donk retweeted
Hi. Professional C/C++ programmer here. The open-source code I can find written by Adam Back and Satoshi Nakamoto don't look remotely similar.
Back's code looks typical of academic Unix programmers who also hack their code to run on Windows.
Satoshi code was written by a professional Windows programmer who also wrote for Unix.
Stylistically, they look nothing alike. There's not enough time between 2005 when I can find the newest Adam Back and January 2009 when Satoshi published Bitcoin/0.1 to account for the change. Both are perfectly competent programmers, but stylistically, they are completely different.
The NYTimes tried to compare their English language in posts/emails. I'm compare their C/C++ language in their open-source code. The NYTimes merely points out they both use C++ as if that's another corroborating detail, when the actual code seems to disqualify Adam Back.
Bitcoin’s founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, has remained hidden for 17 years. A trail of clues — and a year of digging by our reporter, John Carreyrou — led us to a 55-year-old computer scientist in El Salvador named Adam Back. nyti.ms/4bXWC3V
