Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
🚨SHOCKING - FIR against Malabar:
A man walked into a Malabar Gold showroom in Bilaspur with a simple request: exchange his old 22-carat HUID-hallmarked bracelet.
The staff ran it through their XRF machine. Once. Twice. Three times.
Every reading came back the same: 20 carat.
They even told him the hallmark didn’t exist.
He called the local jeweller who had sold him the bracelet. The jeweller walked in, confirmed the HUID, and asked them to test it again.
Same machine. Same bracelet. Same room.
This time an employee adjusted something on the machine. Suddenly the reading flipped to 916 - pure 22 carat.
The jeweller recorded everything. The Sarafa Association arrived. Police registered an FIR against the showroom manager and the machine operator. The machine and DVR were seized.
This wasn’t a small local shop. This was Malabar Gold “the chain that advertises trust, purity, and BIS standards across India”.
One bracelet. Two readings. An 8% gap in gold value. And the only thing that changed was who was watching.
If a hallmarked piece can magically lose two carats the moment a customer wants to exchange it, and magically regain them the moment someone pushes back, what exactly is the machine testing?
Customers don’t walk into Malabar expecting a calibration error that only appears when they’re selling gold.
They walk in expecting the purity printed on their receipt.
The FIR is real.
The readings are on record.
The machine was seized.
Malabar still hasn’t explained why the same piece of gold needed a “setting” before it became 22 carat again.
Until they do, this isn’t a machine glitch.
It’s a business model.
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
हर समस्या का समाधान एक जैसा नहीं होता, समझदारी इसी में है कि हम समस्या को समझें और उसके अनुसार सही रास्ता चुनें। क्योंकि ज्ञान आपको जानकारी देता है, लेकिन शिक्षा आपको सही निर्णय लेना सिखाती है।
क्यों न एक बार यहाँ भी चेक किया जाय..
मैंने केमिस्ट को अपनी समस्या बताई तो उसने दवाई नहीं कंपनी बदल दि..
Volini कि जगह Diclofenec.. 12.38 रु
Dolo 650 कि जगह Paracetamol 650..15.47 रु
टोटल... 27.85 रु
यानी मात्र 28 रु में काम बन गया, एक हप्ते बाद माताजी ने बोला बेटा दुबारा यही दवा लाना पहले से आराम है..
आम लोगों के लिए प्रधानमंत्री जन औषधि केंद्र एक वरदान है..
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
Bu video bu gezegen üzerinde yaşayan herkese izletilmeli.
Eğitim şart ))
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
Look at this idiot BJP Minister justifying the Chinese intrusion in India's territory...😡
Kiren Rijiju :
> "It's not like they came and captured our village"
> "They've set up camp on some land because there's no demarcation"
> "So there is confusion"
And then, in the very same breath, he admits:
> The Chinese PLA has built structures and "village-like buildings" there
> Chinese army activity on the top ridges has "definitely increased"
> The villagers' concern is "valid"
Think about it for a second.
> China builds a whole settlement, and the minister calls it "confusion"
> The PLA is camped on land our own people call ours, and the minister calls it "no demarcation"
> When an opposition leader raises it, he gets labelled "anti-national"
Remember June 2020? "Na koi wahan hamari seema mein ghusa hai, na hi koi ghusa hua hai."
Six years later the script hasn't changed at all. Deny, downplay, and if anyone asks questions, block them on X.
56 inch for the cameras. "Confusion" for China.
CHINA BUILDS. MODI SARKAR EXPLAINS 🗿🔥
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
In 1909, on a beach in southern India, a man looked at a thin, quiet boy and announced he had found the next Messiah.
The man was Charles Leadbeater, a leader of the Theosophical Society, who claimed he could see auras.
The boy was the son of one of the Society’s employees.
Leadbeater said the boy’s aura held no trace of selfishness.
His name was Jiddu Krishnamurti.
What happened next was one of the strangest projects in spiritual history.
The Society’s president, Annie Besant, became his legal guardian. He was taken to England, educated, and trained for one purpose:
to become the vehicle for the coming World Teacher.
In 1911, they built an organisation around him, the Order of the Star in the East, with Krishnamurti at its head.
It grew into a global movement with more than 43,000 members. A Dutch baron gave him a castle with 5,000 acres of woodland. In 1927, Besant declared publicly that the World Teacher was here.
Thousands were waiting for him to speak as the Messiah.
On August 3, 1929, at a camp in Ommen in the Netherlands, he finally did.
In front of Annie Besant and about 3,000 members, he dissolved the entire order.
"Truth is a pathless land," he told them.
No religion, no sect, and no organisation could lead anyone to it. A belief could not be organised. He did not want followers.
He gave back the castle. He returned the money and the land.
People who had spent twenty years preparing to follow him were told there was nothing to follow.
Think about what that took.
He was 34. He had been handed everything a spiritual teacher could want:
devotees, wealth, land, a global platform, and a ready-made identity as the saviour of humanity.
And he walked away from the one thing almost nobody walks away from.
Being someone.
For the next 57 years, he travelled the world saying the same uncomfortable thing in a hundred different ways.
No authority can see the truth for you. Not a guru, not a method, not him.
You have to watch your own mind, the fear, the comparison, the endless striving to become something, until you see that the one watching is made of the same thing it’s watching.
He put it in four words.
The observer is the observed.
Most of us are still waiting for someone to arrive.
The right teacher.
The right method.
The day we’ll finally be ready.
In 1929, the World Teacher arrived.
And the first thing he did was send everyone home.
Not because there was nothing to find.
Because no one else could ever find it for you.
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
Hey @grok , why is this kid able to handle the snake without any problem? Is this kind of snake harmless?
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
In the 2024 election campaign, the Prime Minister and his cabinet colleagues took huge credit for the bull market of the previous few years.
The Prime Minister even encouraged people to invest in PSU stocks.
I then pointed out that the government was doing an unwise thing. If they take credit for bull markets, they need to take the blame for bear markets in the future. You cannot have it only one way.
Also, what are the prices of PSU stocks from 2024 compared with now? What would have happened to those who bought PSU stocks based on the Prime Minister’s call?
However powerful a Prime Minister is, or for that matter the head of any country, no one controls asset cycles.
Trump learned it the hard way. Being the US President, arguably the most powerful position on earth, he thought he could control the bond markets. Instead, he is now acting according to the ebb and flow of the bond market.
Between 1964 and 1981, the US economy grew, yet the markets did little for these 17 years. That is because interest rates went up, compressing valuations.
There was a huge bull market in the US between 1981 and 1999. The US economy continued to do well. But as interest rates went down, markets started expanding valuations, leading to spectacular returns.
If governments could control asset prices, silver would not have fallen by more than 50% during the last 10 months.
Asset cycles are influenced by so many factors.
Government policies are one of the variables.
Government does not decide the fate of assets.
It is asset cycles that decide the fate of governments.
古代小妾除了满足丈夫的生理需求和生孩子以外,还有另一个变态的作用!
是后来有人无意间听长辈说漏嘴才知道的,说那时候小妾有时候是可以被“送出去”的,
怎么说呢,像是一种交换。
古代的小妾,不止是“生儿育女”的工具,她们还有一种更残忍的存在方式:可以被“送出去”。
她们被当作商品、奖励、甚至是交情的象征,在男人之间流转,像是“人形礼物”,一笑一泪之间,命运全由别人决定。
南京博物院里珍藏着明清大户人家的契书,里面有一种叫“典妾契”。
通俗讲,就是转让协议。
一个男人想周转银两,就拿小妾去“典”人家。
跟当铺押东西一个道理,只不过押的不是物,而是人。
押期到了,钱还不出,妾就成了别人家的。
明代冯梦龙曾写过,“妾通买卖”,四个字,把一个女人的命写得干脆又冷血。
她们没有名字,只被称作“某氏”或“某女”,甚至连个冠姓名份都没有。
她们入门无法坐正堂,住偏房,穿不上带牡丹图案的衣裳,也不能用彩色头花,仿佛天生就是“低一等”的人种。
唐律中直接规定,妾属“贱流”,可买可卖,不享有“人身自由”与“婚姻自主”。
一句法条,就把一个人的一生定死。
那时候,一户富人家若要显示地位,就得“家中有妾”;一场交易若要体现诚意,也得“附上美人”。
有的将军打了胜仗,奖赏下属时会说“美女若干”;有的官宦结交上司,会把妾“奉上”以示忠心。
妾,在那个时代不是“人”,是“通货”。
有个叫春桃的女子,原是明清年间扬州“瘦马”出身。
那类女子从小被挑选、喂药、练琴、洗皮、缠足,专为权贵“定制”。
她被卖进山西一户王姓大宅,以为从此能安身立命,却没想到一个赌局就改写了她的命。
王家少爷在庄子上输了两百两银,干脆把她当赌资抵了债。
那天夜里,她还穿着新做的薄绸衣裳,被两个婢女架着,脸都没来得及洗净,就被塞进轿子。
那一趟路,她从山西被抬到徽州,走了26天。
轿子晃得她一身青紫,轿门一开,迎面站着的是一个陌生男人。
她要做的,就是从第一天起,重新“取悦”另一个主子。
有人问,这样的事朝廷没人管吗?
有。
纸上管。
实际呢?
根本拦不住。
到了宋代,“典妾”已经成了灰色市场。
谁家男主人手头紧,就把妾押出去;有钱人想新鲜,就花钱“借妾”玩几月。
甚至出现了“典期妾”——约定时间,期满归还,像租车一样。
古人还自得其乐地总结说,“娶妻以守礼,纳妾以娱情”,好像妾是一种“合法的罪”。
在市井文人笔下,纳妾甚至被写成“风雅”的象征。
宋人周煇在《清波杂志》里直白记载,苏轼被贬岭南时,把宠妾春娘送给朋友换马,文人传为“佳话”。
他们觉得这是一场“风趣的赠答”,像赏画论琴,可没人想过,那叫春娘的女子,是怎么哭着被塞进马车走的。
再往后,到了清代,“送妾”已经成为权贵之间的潜规则。
军功换妾、官场抵人情、商贾报恩,都用这一手。
陆枫《婉词集》里写:“酌酒赠美以表谢功。”
言外之意就是以小妾为谢礼。
有钱人养妾几十房,但真正命好的,十之一二,没生子女的,晚年多被赶出家门。
那些人最后去向何处?
大多卖身、为尼,能活下来的寥寥无几。
最荒唐的,还得说文人。
白居易晚年有句诗,“十载春啼变莺舌,三嫌老丑换蛾眉”,豪气得像喝多了酒的人,嫌小妾哭声多、年纪大,就换个年轻的。
那“换”字,用得自然,好像换马换酒一般。
诗传千古,却让人背后发凉。
在他们的文化里,“妾”不具灵魂。
没人问她愿不愿意,也没人记下她的名字。
她的一生,从买到送、从笑到哭,全顺着别人的手。
有人说,小妾至少能留子,母凭子贵。
可在宗法制度下,连那点希望都被收走了。
孩子一落地,就归正妻名下,生母被称“庶母”,甚至不得探视。
不少妾被逐出,只因主母嫉妒,不想娘俩成亲。
那些被“送走”的妾,连“娘”的身份都被剥夺。
她们最怕过年,因为过年孩子拜堂,喊的“娘”不是自己。
她坐在另一个院落里听号角声,连哭都得捂着嘴。
历史里的女人,很少有选择。
赵姬被吕不韦“献”给异人,换来权位;董卓拿何进的遗妾换军权;晚清商贾用妾讨好督抚。
她们像棋子,被人手来手去。
可我们今天之所以还在谈这些,不是要渲染悲情,而是提醒:
那种制度的残忍,曾在漫长的岁月里被无数人当作“自然”。
直到1950年《婚姻法》颁布,妾制才彻底废除,
那一年,小妾才从法律意义上重新被当作“人”。
Described in Mahabharat too. Putting family at the gambling table as currency or wealth.
古代小妾除了满足丈夫的生理需求和生孩子以外,还有另一个变态的作用!
是后来有人无意间听长辈说漏嘴才知道的,说那时候小妾有时候是可以被“送出去”的,
怎么说呢,像是一种交换。
古代的小妾,不止是“生儿育女”的工具,她们还有一种更残忍的存在方式:可以被“送出去”。
她们被当作商品、奖励、甚至是交情的象征,在男人之间流转,像是“人形礼物”,一笑一泪之间,命运全由别人决定。
南京博物院里珍藏着明清大户人家的契书,里面有一种叫“典妾契”。
通俗讲,就是转让协议。
一个男人想周转银两,就拿小妾去“典”人家。
跟当铺押东西一个道理,只不过押的不是物,而是人。
押期到了,钱还不出,妾就成了别人家的。
明代冯梦龙曾写过,“妾通买卖”,四个字,把一个女人的命写得干脆又冷血。
她们没有名字,只被称作“某氏”或“某女”,甚至连个冠姓名份都没有。
她们入门无法坐正堂,住偏房,穿不上带牡丹图案的衣裳,也不能用彩色头花,仿佛天生就是“低一等”的人种。
唐律中直接规定,妾属“贱流”,可买可卖,不享有“人身自由”与“婚姻自主”。
一句法条,就把一个人的一生定死。
那时候,一户富人家若要显示地位,就得“家中有妾”;一场交易若要体现诚意,也得“附上美人”。
有的将军打了胜仗,奖赏下属时会说“美女若干”;有的官宦结交上司,会把妾“奉上”以示忠心。
妾,在那个时代不是“人”,是“通货”。
有个叫春桃的女子,原是明清年间扬州“瘦马”出身。
那类女子从小被挑选、喂药、练琴、洗皮、缠足,专为权贵“定制”。
她被卖进山西一户王姓大宅,以为从此能安身立命,却没想到一个赌局就改写了她的命。
王家少爷在庄子上输了两百两银,干脆把她当赌资抵了债。
那天夜里,她还穿着新做的薄绸衣裳,被两个婢女架着,脸都没来得及洗净,就被塞进轿子。
那一趟路,她从山西被抬到徽州,走了26天。
轿子晃得她一身青紫,轿门一开,迎面站着的是一个陌生男人。
她要做的,就是从第一天起,重新“取悦”另一个主子。
有人问,这样的事朝廷没人管吗?
有。
纸上管。
实际呢?
根本拦不住。
到了宋代,“典妾”已经成了灰色市场。
谁家男主人手头紧,就把妾押出去;有钱人想新鲜,就花钱“借妾”玩几月。
甚至出现了“典期妾”——约定时间,期满归还,像租车一样。
古人还自得其乐地总结说,“娶妻以守礼,纳妾以娱情”,好像妾是一种“合法的罪”。
在市井文人笔下,纳妾甚至被写成“风雅”的象征。
宋人周煇在《清波杂志》里直白记载,苏轼被贬岭南时,把宠妾春娘送给朋友换马,文人传为“佳话”。
他们觉得这是一场“风趣的赠答”,像赏画论琴,可没人想过,那叫春娘的女子,是怎么哭着被塞进马车走的。
再往后,到了清代,“送妾”已经成为权贵之间的潜规则。
军功换妾、官场抵人情、商贾报恩,都用这一手。
陆枫《婉词集》里写:“酌酒赠美以表谢功。”
言外之意就是以小妾为谢礼。
有钱人养妾几十房,但真正命好的,十之一二,没生子女的,晚年多被赶出家门。
那些人最后去向何处?
大多卖身、为尼,能活下来的寥寥无几。
最荒唐的,还得说文人。
白居易晚年有句诗,“十载春啼变莺舌,三嫌老丑换蛾眉”,豪气得像喝多了酒的人,嫌小妾哭声多、年纪大,就换个年轻的。
那“换”字,用得自然,好像换马换酒一般。
诗传千古,却让人背后发凉。
在他们的文化里,“妾”不具灵魂。
没人问她愿不愿意,也没人记下她的名字。
她的一生,从买到送、从笑到哭,全顺着别人的手。
有人说,小妾至少能留子,母凭子贵。
可在宗法制度下,连那点希望都被收走了。
孩子一落地,就归正妻名下,生母被称“庶母”,甚至不得探视。
不少妾被逐出,只因主母嫉妒,不想娘俩成亲。
那些被“送走”的妾,连“娘”的身份都被剥夺。
她们最怕过年,因为过年孩子拜堂,喊的“娘”不是自己。
她坐在另一个院落里听号角声,连哭都得捂着嘴。
历史里的女人,很少有选择。
赵姬被吕不韦“献”给异人,换来权位;董卓拿何进的遗妾换军权;晚清商贾用妾讨好督抚。
她们像棋子,被人手来手去。
可我们今天之所以还在谈这些,不是要渲染悲情,而是提醒:
那种制度的残忍,曾在漫长的岁月里被无数人当作“自然”。
直到1950年《婚姻法》颁布,妾制才彻底废除,
那一年,小妾才从法律意义上重新被当作“人”。
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
This is story of a Jain merchant Kaku who out of personal dispute invited a Arab mercenary frm Sindh to attack Vallabhi Pur state near Bhavnagar. Before the attack all Jain merchants winded up their business n emptied their derasar of idols n fled to Patan. Unfortunate history
શરદ પૂર્ણિમા: ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભીના વિનાશનો દિવસ
ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં શરદ પૂર્ણિમાના દિવસે, સિંધથી આવેલા આરબ સૈન્ય દ્વારા વલભીનો વિનાશ કરવામાં આવ્યો હતો. વલભી ૫મીથી ૮મી સદી દરમિયાન ગુજરાતની રાજધાની હતી. મૈત્રક વંશના રાજાઓએ ૩૧૮ વર્ષ (ઈ.સ. ૪૭૦-૭૮૮) સુધી ગુજરાત પર શાસન કર્યું હતું. આ વંશના સ્થાપક ભટાર્ક હતા અને તેમની રાજધાની વલભી (વલભીપુર) હતી.
૬ઠ્ઠી સદીમાં, મૈત્રક કાળ દરમિયાન, ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભી એક સમૃદ્ધ બંદર-નગર હતું, જ્યાં વિશાળ બજારો, વિકસિત વેપાર, ભવ્ય મંદિરો અને એક વિશ્વવિદ્યાલય આવેલાં હતાં. ૬ઠ્ઠી અને ૭મી સદીમાં વલભી હિન્દુ ધર્મ, બૌદ્ધ ધર્મ અને જૈન ધર્મનું કેન્દ્ર હતું. ત્યાં ૧૦૦થી વધુ મઠો અને ૮૦૦૦ જેટલા સાધુઓ (ભિક્ષુઓ) નિવાસ કરતા હતા.
૬ઠ્ઠી અને ૭મી સદીમાં, ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભીનો પરિઘ ૧૫ કિલોમીટર જેટલો હતો, તેની વસ્તી લાખોમાં હતી અને ત્યાં ૧૦૦થી વધુ અબજોપતિઓ (ધનકુબેરો) રહેતા હતા. ઈ.સ. ૬૪૦માં ચીની પ્રવાસી હ્યુ એન સાંગે વલભીની મુલાકાત લીધી હતી. તેમણે નોંધ્યું હતું કે, ત્યાંના રાજાના ઘોડા અને હાથીઓને પીવા માટે શુદ્ધ (ગાળેલું) પાણી આપવામાં આવતું હતું.
ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં સિંધના આરબ ગવર્નર સલીમ યુનિસીએ વિશાળ નૌકાદળ સાથે ગુજરાત પર આક્રમણ કર્યું. તેમણે મૈત્રક વંશના રાજા શિલાદિત્ય સાતમાની હત્યા કરી અને ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભીનો વિનાશ કર્યો, જે તે સમયે ભારતનાં શ્રેષ્ઠ નગરોમાંનું એક હતું. આ ઘટનાને લઈને અનેક લોકકથાઓ અને દંતકથાઓ પ્રચલિત છે.
ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભીનો વિનાશ કર્યા બાદ, આરબ સૈન્ય સિંધ પરત ફર્યું. આરબ સૈન્ય સાથેના યુદ્ધમાં ગુજરાતના છેલ્લા મૈત્રક રાજા શિલાદિત્ય સાતમાના મૃત્યુ સાથે મૈત્રક વંશના શાસનનો અંત આવ્યો.
એક લોકકથા મુજબ, વલભીના નગરશેઠ 'રંક કાકુ'ની પુત્રી પાસે રત્નજડિત સોનાની કાંસકી હતી. રાજાએ પોતાની રાજકુમારી માટે તે કાંસકી રંક કાકુ પાસેથી બળજબરીથી લઈ લીધી હતી. ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં, વલભીના નાગરશેઠ 'રંક' સિંધના આરબ ગવર્નર પાસે ગયા અને બદલો લેવા માટે તેમને વલભી પર આક્રમણ કરવા માટે ઉશ્કેર્યા. આરબોએ હુમલો કર્યો અને વલભીનો વિનાશ કર્યો.
ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં, જ્યારે આરબ સૈન્યના આગમનના સમાચાર વલભી પહોંચ્યા, ત્યારે વર્ધમાનસૂરિ અને જૈન શ્રાવકો શહેર છોડીને મોઢેરા ચાલ્યા ગયા. જૈન મંદિરોની મૂર્તિઓને પણ ત્યાંથી ખસેડી લેવામાં આવી. રાજધાની વલભીના વિનાશ પૂર્વે, જૈન વણિકો ૧૮,૦૦૦ ગાડાઓમાં પોતાનો સામાન અને તીર્થંકરોની મૂર્તિઓ લઈને મોઢેરા સ્થળાંતર કરી ગયા.
ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં શરદ પૂર્ણિમાના દિવસે (૫ ઓક્ટોબર અને ૧૧ નવેમ્બરની વચ્ચે), સિંધના આરબો દ્વારા ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભીનો વિનાશ કરવામાં આવ્યો હતો. ૧૨૩૮ વર્ષ પહેલાં, ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮ની શરદ પૂર્ણિમાએ વલભીના નાગરિકોએ અત્યાચાર, અગ્નિની પીડા, હત્યાકાંડ અને વિનાશનો સામનો કર્યો હતો.
ઈ.સ. ૭૮૮માં ગુજરાતની રાજધાની વલભીના વિનાશની વિગતો જૈન પ્રબંધોમાં તેમજ સૌરાષ્ટ્રની મુલાકાત લેનાર ૧૧મી સદીના ફારસી વિદ્વાન અલ-બિરૂનીના પ્રવાસવર્ણનમાં જોવા મળે છે. તેમણે વલભી નગરના અવશેષો જોયા હતા અને તેનો ઇતિહાસ નોંધ્યો હતો.
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
आयुर्वेद ने बेटे कि ज़िंदगी बर्बाद कर दी...
सिर्फ 30 साल की उम्र में खेल के मैदान से सीधे बिस्तर पर
एक तथाकथित आयुर्वेदिक डॉक्टर ने
3 साल तक रोज़ 100mg स्वर्ण भस्म दी
आयुर्वेद का कोई साइड इफ़ेक्ट नहीं होता
इस अंधविश्वास ने हंसती-खेलती ज़िंदगी को नरक बना दिया...1/2
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
नतीजा?
भयंकर हेवी मेटल टॉक्सिसिटी Heavy Metal Toxicity
आज यह नौजवान सिर्फ 2 चीज़ें खा पा रहा है
उसका नर्वस, डाइजेशन और कार्डियोवैस्कुलर सिस्टम पूरी तरह तबाह हो चुका है
आयुर्वेद का कोई साइड इफ़ेक्ट नहीं होता'
इस एक अंधविश्वास ने हंसती-खेलती ज़िंदगी को नरक बना दिया
किताबें भी कहती हैं कि भस्म जैसी धातु की दवाएं
कुछ ही समय के लिए दी जानी चाहिए
लेकिन अंधाधुंध इलाज ने मरीज़ को MCAS, डिसऑटोनोमिया
और स्मॉल फाइबर न्यूरोपैथी जैसी गंभीर बीमारियाँ दे दीं
सीख जो आपकी जान बचा सकती है -
• बिना ट्रायल की दवाओं से बचें - एलोपैथी सालों के कड़े ट्रायल के बाद आती है, जबकि पारंपरिक दवाओं के नाम पर कुछ भी बेचना आसान है
• हेवी मेटल शरीर के लिए नहीं हैं - इंसान के अंगों में भारी धातुओं का कोई काम नहीं है, ये सिर्फ ज़हर हैं
• अंधभक्त न बनें - हर प्राकृतिक चीज़ सुरक्षित नहीं होती, डॉक्टर क्वालिफाइड है या नहीं, यह ज़रूर जांचें
अगर आप या आपके परिवार में कोई भी
भस्म वाली दवाएं बिना सोचे-समझे खा रहा है, तो तुरंत रुकिए
इस जानकारी को जितना हो सके लोगो को बताये ताकि
कोई और इसका शिकार न हो
आपके क्या विचार हैं?
नीचे कमैंट्स में बताएं...2/2
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
Another fatal luxury car crash that killed a scooterist in Kerala by a 17 year old, son of District Judge ⚠️
Victim's Niece was told,
"Don't teach me law, you have no rights to question me" - Minor's father(additional district judge)
"Don't overreact and get emotionally driven, he is just a 17 year old kid" - Kerala Police
The accident occurred at around 2:20 AM to 3:00 AM at Cheranalloor in Kochi. A speeding luxury Mercedes-Benz car, registered under the name of the additional judge, rammed into a scooter from behind. The scooter rider, 55-year-old Jayabalakrishnan of Manjali, was killed. He was a local street vendor returning home after closing his wayside eatery (thattukada) near a temple in Chittoor.
The 17-year-old minor, who does not possess a driving license, reportedly took the car out for a night drive. He was speeding at 100km/hr while the crash occured as per reports. The victim's niece JAYALAKSHMI claims that the accused was not shown to them at the police station and Kerala police insisted them to not get emotionally driven by this incident as if this isn't a big loss at all. The father of the 17 year old accused who is a district court judge spoke rudely at the police station asking them not to teach him law as per Jayalakshmi's claim.
The central issue is the loss of a human life. Jayabalakrishnan's family has suffered an irreversible loss, and the circumstances surrounding his death must be investigated thoroughly. The victim and his family deserve justice, while the investigation and any subsequent legal proceedings must establish responsibility on the basis of evidence rather than influence, status or public speculation.
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
ગુજરાતી ટ્વિટર મૂર્ખાઓની રાજધાની છે.
આ પાર્ટી પકોડાઓ લોકોને ગઢવી ના ધંધે લગાડીને અલગ ગરબા રમવા લાગ્યા.
રુલ1 : જ્યારે જ્યારે આ પાર્ટી ડોચુઓ હી એન્ડ મુ ના મુદ્દા ઉપાડે તો કોઈ મોટું કાંડ ઢાંકવા માટે જ કરતા હોય છે. ડાયવર્ઝન!
Replying to @RLPrashantsin12
हां, Air चीफ मार्शल अमरप्रीत सिंह (A.P. Singh) की लेटेस्ट खबर ये है। आज PTI इंटरव्यू में उन्होंने कहा कि ऑपरेशन सिंदूर की 1200 किमी चौड़ाई और 200 किमी गहराई वाली स्ट्राइक्स से साबित हुआ कोई टारगेट IAF की पहुंच से बाहर नहीं। एयर पावर प्राइमरी रिस्पॉन्डर और डिटेरेंट है। इंडिजनस वेपन्स ने शानदार काम किया। वे 31 अक्टूबर को रिटायर हो रहे हैं, अगले चीफ अशुतोष दीक्षित होंगे। 20 अक्टूबर को अंतिम सॉर्टी किरान में पहले इंस्ट्रक्टर के साथ पूरी की।
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
Indian army infantry battalion during a recent faceoff with PLA in Arunachal Pradesh
Prof. Jay Gohil ડૉજયેન્દ્ર ગોહિલ MDPed Res.Analyst retweeted
> made her beg 100 times
> gives her stare to control her narrative
> says he'll cheat if felt unloved
> will probably divorce her after having kids
jhukti hai jeetas jhukane wala chahiye































