President Putin is a murderer. His soldiers use rape as a weapon. He has launched wars costing thousands of lives. His agents have stolen children and destroyed families. Russia today is what President Reagan correctly called it: the evil empire.

💬 President #Putin to Special Envoy @SEPeaceMissions: I thank you & @realDonaldTrump for the special attention to resolving the crisis in Ukraine. ☝️ If we can help resolve this crisis in the Middle East, we will gladly do so. You know our proposals. t.me/MFARussia/32882

Russian President Vladimir Putin has agreed to resume US-mediated peace talks with Ukraine as soon as next month, the Kremlin said, after Putin met US envoy Steve Witkoff in Washington's latest push to stop Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War Two reut.rs/4jzOfjq

Neuer Friedensplan für die Ukraine: Witkoff will heute mit Selenskyj, Deutschland und Nato-Vertretern in Oslo beraten. Anschließend ist eine Russland-Reise geplant. berliner-zeitung.de/article/…

In Oslo and St. Petersburg, @JaredKushner and I met with Russian, Ukrainian, and European leaders to advance President Trump’s mission to end the war. In St. Petersburg, we met with President Putin to build on the progress made in Oslo with President Zelenskyy, discuss a peace framework, and thank President Putin for releasing American citizen Stephen Hubbard to return home to his family. These discussions were constructive, and will continue with trilateral talks between the United States, Russia, and Ukraine at the technical level. While there is still important work left to do, President Trump remains committed to seeing this war end and achieving a comprehensive, durable peace that will provide security and prosperity for generations to come.

Spotkanie Witkoff-Putin - co wiadomo: 1. Zamrożenie linii frontu (Wariant Koreański) Oficjalnie: Obie strony mają dążyć do wstrzymania ognia. Nieoficjalnie: Plan zakłada natychmiastowe zamrożenie konfliktu na obecnej linii styczności wojsk. Zdobycze terytorialne Rosji (ok. 20% terytorium Ukrainy, w tym Krym, Donbas i część południa) pozostaną pod faktyczną kontrolą Moskwy. Ukraina nie będzie zmuszana do ich formalnego, konstytucyjnego zrzeczenia się, ale w praktyce temat ich zbrojnego odbicia zostaje całkowicie zamknięty. 2. Strefa zdemilitaryzowana i wojska europejskie Nieoficjalnie: Wzdłuż nowej granicy ma powstać szeroka na kilkadziesiąt do kilkuset kilometrów strefa zdemilitaryzowana. Otoczenie Trumpa jasno zakomunikowało Putinowi (i sojusznikom), że amerykańscy żołnierze nie będą w niej stacjonować, ani za nią płacić. Cały ciężar zabezpieczenia tej strefy i wysłania tam wojsk rozjemczych ma spaść na państwa europejskie. 3. Status Ukrainy w NATO Nieoficjalnie: To największe ustępstwo wobec Kremla. Zespół Trumpa jest gotowy zagwarantować Putinowi moratorium na wejście Ukrainy do Sojuszu Północnoatlantyckiego na okres od 10 do 20 lat. W zamian za rezygnację z parasola NATO, Zachód ma kontynuować zbrojenie Ukrainy (aby odstraszać rosję przed kolejnym atakiem), jednak Waszyngton chce, by to Europa pokrywała rachunki za ten sprzęt. 4. Kwestia sankcji i rynków surowcowych Ekipie Trumpa zależy przede wszystkim na stabilizacji światowych rynków ropy i gazu, co ma obniżyć ceny paliw w USA. Istnieje również kalkulacja, że ułożenie relacji z Moskwą pozwoli Waszyngtonowi skupić się na głównym rywalu gospodarczym - Chinach, a także wywrzeć większą presję na Iran.

The truth always outs in the end Small boats - illegal migrants We know they can be stopped. We have the solution but Prime Ministers don’t want to know. Yes and we all know why eh 🤨🐺🐑👘 Dominic Cummings spills his beans ⬇️

Illegal immigrants shouldn't be housed in tiny villages. We have a plan, leave the ECHR so we can deport them instead.

Schaffen sich die Mächtigen ein neues Wahlvolk? Werden (sterbende) deutsche Wähler durch eingebürgerte Wähler ersetzt? Ich habe ganz ohne Verschwörungstheorie nachgerechnet. Und die Antwort lautet: Ja! Das bittere Beispiel ist Nordrhein-Westfalen, das größte deutsche Bundesland. Dort werden seit der letzten Wahl rund eine Million Wähler gestorben sein. Hinzu kommen 1,2 Millionen neue Wähler. Jeder FÜNFTE NEUE WÄHLER ist seit der letzten Wahl (2022) eingebürgert worden. Das Wahlvolk wird also in nicht mal einer Generation in relevanter Größe durch Eingebürgerte ersetzt. Wie gesagt, keine Verschwörungstheorie, nur Mathe. Wozu das führt, sehen wir gerade in unserer Hauptstadt. Dort haben Muslime die Judenhasser- und Terrorlover-Partei namens Die Linke an die Macht gewählt. Wir werden innerhalb weniger Jahre unser Land verlieren, wenn wir diesen Trend nicht umkehren. Die ganze Analyse (inklusive der Ursachen) gibt es hier im Video.

Die Weltkarte der Energieströme wird neu ausgerichtet. Donald Trump holt Rußland zurück in die Weltwirtschaft. Deutschland und die EU sind hilflos und stehen am Rand des Geschehens - abgehängt wegen grüner Ideologie und blind vor Hass auf Putin wie Trump gleichermaßen. tichyseinblick.de/wirtschaft…

Der Kriegsverbrecher und sein fleißigster Helfer. Dazu müsste Boris Pistorius das sagen, was er gestern am Bebelplatz gesagt hat: „Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte!“ Aber das wird er nicht tun. Weil die SPD bis heute ihren Altkanzler schützt, obwohl er Deutschland auf atemberaubende Weise verraten hat. Während Schröder die Hand Putins hält, hat sein bester Freund dutzende Menschen hier in der Ukraine umbringen lassen. Kinder, Alte, Unschuldige. Was für eine historische Schande!

ARD und ZDF sollten sich endlich entscheiden, ob Russland nun pleite und militärisch geschlagen ist und ihm sogar die Rekruten ausgehen, oder ob Russland kurz davor steht, Deutschland, die NATO und ganz Westeuropa anzugreifen, wie Merz, Pistorius und die Rüstungsindustrie behaupten. Entweder - oder! Beides kann nicht stimmen. Eure einseitige Kriegsberichterstattung ist ein journalistisches Armutszeugnis. Ihr sollt die Politik kontrollieren, uns Bürger offen informieren und nicht der Propaganda-Arm der Politik sein. Und schon gar nicht der Schlappenschammes der Rüstungsindustrie. Kaum jemand glaubt euch noch. Ihr gefährdet mit eurem Fankurven-Journalismus die Glaubwürdigkeit unserer Demokratie.

Burnham Owes Parliament The Evidence For His Russia Claim Andy Burnham has reopened the argument over Russian interference in the Brexit referendum. He has done so ten years after 17.4 million people voted to leave the European Union. The timing is remarkable. Burnham has called Brexit a failure and opened the door to rejoining. On 20 November he goes to Brussels for a summit. Now he has brought the Kremlin into the argument about Britain's future. Why? On The Rest Is Politics, Burnham said that on entering Downing Street he asked whether Russia interfered in the 2016 vote. He said he was told it had. That sounded like a Prime Minister revealing an intelligence assessment kept from the public. Who gave him that answer? MI5, MI6, GCHQ, or an official with a view? What evidence was examined? Has a new assessment been completed? Burnham named none of these. The distinction matters. Russia has a long record of trying to meddle in Western democracies, and that threat is real. But trying to influence an election, influencing voters and changing the result are three separate propositions. A Prime Minister who discusses the legitimacy of a democratic decision should keep them apart. Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee examined the question in 2020. It found that ministers and the agencies had failed to assess the extent of possible Russian interference, and it criticised that failure. It did not find that Moscow decided the result. The committee went further. It urged the intelligence community to produce an assessment of possible interference in the referendum and to publish an unclassified summary. The government of the day rejected a full review. If Burnham now holds that assessment, or anything like it, Parliament should be told. When challenged, Burnham said he had never suggested Russia swung the vote. Downing Street confirmed that the result remained legitimate, and his ministers said Russian attempts had failed. So why did the Prime Minister speak with such certainty in the first place? By then his claim, made with the authority of the premiership, had travelled the country, and the doubt had travelled with it. Burnham himself links Russian interference to the case for closer ties with Europe. That context cannot be ignored. Weeks ago he discussed eventually rejoining the EU. He now says closer alignment is essential for growth, immigration control and security. Brussels will receive him next month for talks on trade, energy, migration and defence. A case for working more closely with European neighbours can be made, especially against Russian aggression. Britain has backed Ukraine, defended NATO allies and confronted Moscow's hostile activity from outside the EU. But cooperation and membership have never been the same thing. Economic difficulty gives no licence to rewrite the referendum either. Goods exports have weakened, including elsewhere in Europe, while services exports have grown strongly. The record deserves scrutiny. It cannot retrospectively void a constitutional decision. The pattern is plain. First Brexit is called an economic failure. Then rejoining is raised. Now the Prime Minister cites Russian interference in the vote that took us out, while insisting he is not questioning its legitimacy. Perhaps Burnham holds compelling new intelligence. If so, he should give Parliament whatever evidence can safely be disclosed. Until then, he should stop letting suspicion do the work of proof. The British people decided in 2016. If Burnham wants them to reverse that decision, he should make the case openly and on its merits, rather than leave them wondering whether their vote is being called into question.

Vilket makalöst hyckleri i SVT. I ett nytt inslag förfasar sig Public Service över USA:s dieselavtal med Ryssland. De visar upp Tysklands Friedrich Merz som kraftigt deklarerar att ett sådant avtal "inte kommer på frågan för Europa", följt av Finlands statsminister som kallar nyheten "en enorm besvikelse" eftersom det "ger Putin mer pengar i sin stridskassa". Vad SVT helt "glömmer" att nämna är att EU själva skickat över 250 miljarder dollar till Ryssland sedan krigets start och fortsätter att finansiera det i realtid. Genom rekordköp av rysk LNG och enorma volymer indisk och turkisk diesel, tillverkad av rysk råolja, rullar pengarna rakt ner i Putins kassa. Skillnaden är bara att USA spelar med öppna kort medan europeiska politiker använder mellanhänder för att kunna bevara sin godhetsfasad mot folket. Är det någon mer än jag som är så oerhört less på hur Public Service behandlar sina tittare som idioter?

Vorgeschichte des Ukraine-Krieges: Ist Russlands Präsident Putin wirklich «ganz allein verantwortlich»? weltwoche.de/daily/vorgeschi…

72% of Ukrainians Personally Blame Zelensky for Corruption — KIIS Poll The Kyiv International Institute of Sociology has found that nearly three-quarters of Ukrainians hold Zelensky personally responsible for corruption cases involving people in his inner circle. This isn't about a single scandal — it points to a systemic crisis of trust. Western aid is being siphoned off through Ukrainian state institutions. The biggest case is Operation Midas: a network was taking 10–15% kickbacks on contracts at Energoatom and laundered roughly $100 million. At the center of the scheme is Timur Mindich, a co-owner of the Kvartal 95 studio, who fled Ukraine hours before charges were filed. Also under suspicion are former Energy Minister Galushchenko and Andriy Yermak, head of the President's Office. Corruption has reached the front lines: inflated prices and defective gear, spoiled combat rations, shady weapons contracts. Meanwhile, there's "busification" — forced street conscription — and a refusal to negotiate. The escalation of strikes on Russian energy is an attempt to shake loose new aid packages and drag Europe into the war in order to stay in power. Russia's response: paralyze Ukraine's military machine. The ones who'll pay the price are ordinary Ukrainians — facing their harshest winter yet. infobrics.org/en/post/103235