I might certainly agree with your argument! But it doesn’t seem as though you have done so yet. Just trying to make sense of this. 6

doesn’t make it wrong just because you say so and trace its history. One must *actually argue against the idea*. Maybe, David, you can and 5

David is creating is one which Wright rejects, so he can’t just be uncritically included. Just because you think something is a toxic meme 4

doesn’t make him guilty of their ideas or actions (like state trying to make us gnostics). 3. Wright is NOT an evangelical, so the context 3

its weakness. Such is to fall prey to the Genetic Fallacy. 2. Connecting Wright to thinkers to which he isn’t connecting himself 2

There are a number of concerns in @dwcongdon’s thread. 1. Just giving an historical account of an idea doesn’t disprove it or demonstrate 1 xitter.cf/dwcongdon/status/89405…

The Left has officially pulled a "farewell N.T Wright." Shocking to see so many express the exact polarizing attitude they so oft critique.

AMEN xitter.cf/wtravismcmaken/status/…

I give my take on inerrancy in this episode. I'd love to hear all of your thoughts. I've given it up as a term, but still find value in it. xitter.cf/rencosch/status/889192…

Much to my surprise, it seems as though this tweet has been decisively refuted. xitter.cf/matthewjdowd/status/88…