John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
I’ve been working on these 7-9 revision booklets over half term. You can download them all here: dropbox.com/scl/fo/v99qg5qpo… Use/chuck as you see fit!
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Nick Gibb tells how DfE advisor Sam Freedman made a bet with a colleague about how many academies they could make. He won. But more recently Freedman has acknowledged: 'the policy hasnt been as transformative as hoped… schools that didnt become academies perform roughly as well'
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
You say we should be honest about the whole history and not just the convenient parts. I agree so let's do that.
African rulers and merchants did sell captives into the Atlantic trade. Nobody serious denies it and plenty of Africans have faced it openly. Benin's president, Mathieu Kérékou, apologised for his country's part in 1999. Ghana spent years building reconciliation projects with the diaspora around exactly this history. Africa has been looking at its own role for a long time. The question is whether Britain is willing to look at its own with the same honesty.
Because the scale was never equal. The ships were British, French, Portuguese and Dutch. So were the insurance, the financing, the ports, the sugar plantations and the laws that turned human beings into property. British vessels alone carried more than three million Africans across the Atlantic. A local chief selling captives on the coast didn't build Bristol or Liverpool. The demand and the machinery came from Europe and Britain sat near the top of it for most of the 18th and 19th century.
You mention Britain's role in ending the trade and that part deserves credit. The rest of that story matters too. When Britain abolished slavery in 1833 it paid £20 million in compensation, around 40% of the Treasury's annual budget at the time. Every penny went to the slave owners. The enslaved received nothing and were made to keep working for their former owners as apprentices for years afterwards. That's the part of the history people find inconvenient.
Then there's your point about taxpayers. You say nobody alive today should pay for something that happened generations ago. British taxpayers were paying off the loan that funded that compensation until 2015. The Treasury confirmed it so British taxpayers today have already paid for slavery. They paid to compensate the people who owned human beings. The descendants of the people who were owned are the only ones who have never received anything.
If the argument is that the present shouldn't pay for the past, the British state already settled that question when it chose who to pay.
On debt relief, I'm the last person who'll defend corrupt African and Caribbean elites. I spend most of my time criticising Ghana's leaders for mismanaging our country and I'll keep doing it but writing off debt in the 2000s was never reparations. Most of that debt was owed to Western lenders in the first place & much of it on terms that kept poor countries dependent on selling raw materials. Cancelling some of it was the lenders tidying up their books. It wasn't anyone acknowledging the centuries of extraction that left these economies where they started.
Tony Blair expressed deep sorrow in 2006. Sorrow is something you express at a funeral you weren't responsible for. Caribbean governments are asking for a formal acknowledgement from the state that profited which is a different thing entirely. CARICOM's plan asks for an apology, help with public health and education and debt cancellation. Calling that global welfare tells me you haven't read it @KemiBadenoch
As for looking forward and not backwards the Asante gold looted from Kumasi in 1874 was still sitting in British museums until 2024 when some of it was lent... not returned to the Asantehene for his jubilee. The past isn't behind anyone while Britain is still holding it in glass cases.
Nobody is asking the average British worker to feel guilty for what their great-great-grandparents did. We're asking the British state, the same institution that ran the trade and compensated the slave owners to deal honestly with what it did. A country that's proud of its history should be able to handle all of it....the part where it ended the trade and the part where it built its wealth on it.
You're right that the Commonwealth should look forward. It just can't do that properly while one side keeps insisting the other has nothing to complain about @KemiBadenoch
Slavery was an evil in which people from every continent and region participated. We should be honest about the whole history, not select the parts that are politically convenient today, especially given Britain's leading role in ending the transatlantic slave trade.
If Caribbean countries are asking Britain for a formal apology for Britain’s role in the transatlantic slave trade, will they also be asking the same of the descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who captured, sold and profited from the trade?
On demands for reparations, whether through cash or debt relief, we have been down this track before. Twenty-five years ago, Jubilee 2000, Drop the Debt and Make Poverty History argued that cancelling the debts of poorer countries would give them a fresh start. More than $100 billion of debt was eventually written off, but many of those countries have since built up even bigger debts. Labour are already spending too much on Britain's welfare state, now is not the time for Andy Burnham to be providing global welfare.
There is no reason British taxpayers today should be held financially responsible for things that happened generations before any of us were born. And I have even less patience for political elites in commonwealth countries who don’t know how to make their own citizens prosperous now looking for another opportunity to blame Britain.
As Prime Minister, Andy Burnham should be Britain’s greatest defender. Instead, he is writing articles saying we need to confront our history (as if we haven't done enough of that) and considering another formal historical apology. Tony Blair already expressed Britain’s deep sorrow and regret for our role in the slave trade nearly twenty years ago. There is no need to do so again.
This is all another navel-gazing distraction. The Commonwealth should be looking forward, not endlessly backwards. That means economic partnerships to make us all richer and deeper military and security cooperation against common threats. If every Commonwealth summit becomes an exercise in presenting Britain with demands for cash then we need to start asking if it is worth the effort.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Kemi, congratulations on leading a major British party as a Black Woman. It takes real talent to rise to where you are and deceit is what it takes to rise as a Black leader in a western Conservative Party.
It is a pity the climb did not leave room for a history book and since you chose to argue in the language of history, let us do the history. Let’s dissect your verbal diarrhea point by point.
Everyone participated." Slavery existed on every continent. So did war, and nobody calls a village feud the World War. The transatlantic trade ran for 366 years (1501 to 1866) and put about 12.5 million Africans on ships, of whom about 1.8 million died before they saw the Americas, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database. It ran through joint-stock companies, chartered monopolies, Lloyd's underwriters and acts of Parliament. It was hereditary, because the law made the child of an enslaved mother property from birth. It was racial, because a whole continent was defined as chattel. No other system in history combined those features at that scale. Dissolving all of it into "people from every continent" is far worse than intellectual dishonesty.
Britain was a market leader, not a participant. British ships carried about 3.2 million Africans, second only to Portugal and Brazil. The Treaty of Utrecht (1713) gave Britain the asiento, a thirty-year monopoly to supply 4,800 enslaved Africans a year to Spanish America. The Royal African Company, chartered in 1672 and headed by the Duke of York, later James II, branded its captives "DY". During Edward Colston's years in its leadership it shipped about 84,000 people, and roughly 19,000 died on the way.
You say British taxpayers should not answer for what happened before they were born. They did. In 1833 Britain borrowed £20 million to compensate slaveholders, and taxpayers serviced that loan until 2015, including the descendants of the enslaved. So the principle you invoke was not applied when the cheque went to slaveholders. It only appears when the cheque changes direction.
"Navel-gazing" is a curious charge from someone whose party spends more energy on the past (Empire nostalgia, culture war crusades) than most of those you accuse. Defend Britain if you must. But do not use your Nigerian name as the permission slip for arguments Nigerians know better than anyone.
Slavery was an evil in which people from every continent and region participated. We should be honest about the whole history, not select the parts that are politically convenient today, especially given Britain's leading role in ending the transatlantic slave trade.
If Caribbean countries are asking Britain for a formal apology for Britain’s role in the transatlantic slave trade, will they also be asking the same of the descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who captured, sold and profited from the trade?
On demands for reparations, whether through cash or debt relief, we have been down this track before. Twenty-five years ago, Jubilee 2000, Drop the Debt and Make Poverty History argued that cancelling the debts of poorer countries would give them a fresh start. More than $100 billion of debt was eventually written off, but many of those countries have since built up even bigger debts. Labour are already spending too much on Britain's welfare state, now is not the time for Andy Burnham to be providing global welfare.
There is no reason British taxpayers today should be held financially responsible for things that happened generations before any of us were born. And I have even less patience for political elites in commonwealth countries who don’t know how to make their own citizens prosperous now looking for another opportunity to blame Britain.
As Prime Minister, Andy Burnham should be Britain’s greatest defender. Instead, he is writing articles saying we need to confront our history (as if we haven't done enough of that) and considering another formal historical apology. Tony Blair already expressed Britain’s deep sorrow and regret for our role in the slave trade nearly twenty years ago. There is no need to do so again.
This is all another navel-gazing distraction. The Commonwealth should be looking forward, not endlessly backwards. That means economic partnerships to make us all richer and deeper military and security cooperation against common threats. If every Commonwealth summit becomes an exercise in presenting Britain with demands for cash then we need to start asking if it is worth the effort.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
The family of Stanley Matthews, first Ballon d'Or winner ever, is on the red carpet
#ballondor
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Perhaps the most stark and revealing (accidental?) admission in the David Bell 'antisemitism in UK schools report. Antisemitic attitudes aren't increasing, only anti-Israel ones are. That's what most of this is about.
From the horse's mouth:
assets.publishing.service.go…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
The cheek of this MP and this party! They ripped the guts out of education by one eyed policies and year on year funding cuts. The @educationgovuk have been too slow and too weak to rectify the situation and the latest announcements make it worse still. Time to put children 1st
Labour failed to be upfront with schools about fully funding pay rises. Their spin is unravelling - special schools have been cancelled, the high needs block has been frozen, a £2bn blackhole remains, schools are in the red, & now they are being left with difficult choices to cut SEND staff. Labour can put this right in the budget next week.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
The latest Ofsted data (n = 3,189 schools) reveals a persistent association between deprivation and weaker curriculum and teaching judgements.
Among secondary schools, those serving the most disadvantaged communities were nearly 4 times as likely to be graded below expected as those serving the least disadvantaged communities.
Does this new framework STILL penalise disadvantaged schools?
gov.uk/government/statistica…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
A little reminder. P8 is zero sum by design - ie centred around zero. Only 16% get +0.5 and above. Half of schools are blow zero. If you sneer at these schools you're the problem. Projecting the idea that it's only the 16% doing good work is bullshit. Get over yourself.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Can someone please organise a gong for Mike 🙏
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
A historic video – November 22, 1994:
The U.S. President thanks Ukraine for giving up its nuclear weapons. In return, the U.S. promises to stand by Ukraine’s side to safeguard its independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity well into the future.
That future has arrived—yet today, Trump and his circle act as if none of this ever happened.
t.me/MirovichMedia/15617
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
The best general of WW2 might be a man most people have never heard of: William Slim.
No famous pistols. No riding crop. No glamorous desert duels. Just a stocky, square-jawed Englishman his troops called "Uncle Bill." And he pulled off what might be the greatest turnaround of the entire war.
Slim wasn't supposed to be a general at all. He grew up in a family that had fallen on hard times. He worked as a clerk and a schoolteacher. He got into the army through a university officer training corps he wasn't even enrolled at. He was badly wounded at Gallipoli in WW1, then worked his way up the Indian Army with no money and no connections.
In 1942, he was handed a disaster.
The Japanese were steamrolling through Burma. Slim took command of the British forces there and led them on the longest retreat in British military history. Around 900 miles, through jungle and mountains, all the way back to India. They arrived starving, sick, beaten, and with almost nothing left.
Slim later wrote openly about his own mistakes in that campaign. Generals almost never do that.
In 1943, he was given command of the new 14th Army. On paper, it was a mess.
It was the most diverse army Britain fielded in the war. Indians, Gurkhas, Britons, East and West Africans, Burmese. Dozens of languages. It got the worst equipment and the lowest priority, because Europe came first. Its men called it "the Forgotten Army."
And it was being destroyed by disease. At one point, for every man wounded in battle, about 120 were falling sick, mostly from malaria.
Slim's fix was simple and ruthless. Anti-malaria pills became an order, not a suggestion. Officers were held personally responsible. If too many men in a unit got sick, the commander got sacked. Sickness rates collapsed.
Then he fixed the fear. The Japanese had won in 1942 by slipping around British units in the jungle and cutting them off, which caused panic and retreat. Slim's new rule: if you're surrounded, you don't run. You dig in, form a defensive "box," and the air force will supply you from the sky.
In February 1944, it worked. At the "Admin Box" in Arakan, a Japanese attack surrounded a British-Indian force. The force held. Planes dropped supplies. The Japanese ran out of food and broke. It was the first major Japanese defeat on land in Burma.
A month later, the Japanese launched their big gamble: an invasion of India itself, aimed at Imphal and Kohima.
Slim did something that terrified London. He pulled his forces back onto the Imphal plain and let the Japanese come to him. They had brought only a few weeks of supplies, betting they could capture British stockpiles.
They never did. At Kohima, the two sides fought across a tennis court at a few yards' distance. At Imphal, the British held for months while being supplied by air. The Japanese army starved in the hills. Out of roughly 85,000 men, tens of thousands died, many from hunger and disease. It was the worst defeat the Japanese army had ever suffered up to that point.
Then Slim went on the offensive.
In early 1945, he crossed the Irrawaddy River and made the Japanese believe his main attack was aimed at Mandalay. They rushed their forces there to defend it.
Meanwhile, he had quietly sent an entire corps south through jungle trails, under radio silence, using fake signals traffic to hide the move. It burst out and seized Meiktila, the Japanese supply and communications hub, far behind their lines.
The Japanese army in Burma was cut in two and collapsed. By May 1945, Rangoon was back in Allied hands. The army that had fled 900 miles in defeat had marched all the way back.
And even then, Slim almost got fired. That same month, his superior tried to push him out. When word got around, the backlash was so severe that the superior was the one who ended up being replaced.
Slim later became a field marshal, head of the British Army, and Governor-General of Australia.
He called his memoir "Defeat into Victory." No title has ever been more honest.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Laughable to see the usual suspects trying to play the middle class anti-union card. Unions are membership organisations that represent a massive percentage of the people doing the job - the workers. Life was a great deal worse for workers before they existed.
NEW: A third education union has declared no confidence in Ofsted's leadership, calling attempts at reform "dishonest and deficient".
@NAHTnews has agreed to explore "all actions necessary" to challenge the inspection framework & its impact on leaders.
tes.com/magazine/news/genera…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Trump actually posted this AI video of him with a tiger in the middle of the night. This man is demented and mentally unwell.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
Watch World War I Every Day On The Western Front In 60 Seconds
See the full version: brilliantmaps.com/ww1-wester…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
This, published Friday, is a brilliant investigation by @SchoolsWeek's @jackydys into high academy executive pay and the justifications offered by some chains. Fragmentation of system comes through: schoolsweek.co.uk/our-ceos-d…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
As headteachers, we owe it to our colleagues to speak up about the challenges we all face in education. They’ve stepped up again and again and again through immense and relentless challenges.
Our school is probably in the best place it’s ever been, everyone is working incredibly hard and we are reinventing and innovating constantly and I’m really proud of our staff and what we have. But it’s a precarious balancing act, held together by people bringing their all, every single day, and I worry that it's not sustainable.
They’re human. They get tired and their hard work, loyalty and commitment simply cannot keep plugging the funding gaps forever.
The system is breaking. We need more money. And we need more heads saying so. Doing well doesn’t mean all is well.
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
The death penalty does little to deter crime or deliver justice for victims.
It has no place in the 21st century and should be abolished.
More from @UNHumanRights on Saturday’s World Day against the Death Penalty: ohchr.org/en/topic/death-pen…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
This should be watched by everyone. Now more than ever as people appear to have lost touch with reality.
Watched this years ago and was excited to see channel 4 are rerunning the whole 26 episode series
Brilliant
#Worldatwwar
channel4.com/programmes/the-…
John Sharp 👨🏫🌻 retweeted
The death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person. The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment: effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption. #NoDeathPenalty





































