
Remember, we didn’t do any of this to ourselves. Politicians of all colours did it to us. Member of @RestoreBritain #GoWokeGoBroke #NoneInAllOut
Willerby, East Yorkshire
Joined July 2008
- Tweets4.3K
- Following1.6K
- Followers436
- Likes23.9K
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
The coward @CllrSimonB has closed his X account.
Don’t call his office (07973 665277), nor email him ([email protected]) to say how much you despise this POS.
Oh, btw. His civic correspondence address is c/o Civic Centre, St. Peter’s Square, Wolverhampton, WV1 1RG.
Have fun.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
Privacy has never been about hiding a crime. It's about who holds the power to see into your life, you or someone else. The "nothing to hide" argument was written by the watchers, not the watched.
That's why we've always sealed envelopes: not out of guilt, but because the letter belongs to two people, and only two.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
When are we going to have had enough of being second class citizens in our own country?
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
An officer must have a valid objective reason to believe handcuffing is necessary. The accepted criteria include:
1 - Preventing Escape: A reasonable belief that the detainee will attempt to run away.
Henry Nowak was unable to stand, let alone run away.
2 - Preventing Harm: To protect the officer, the public, or the detainee themselves from imminent violence or self-injury.
Henry Nowak was bleeding out, unable to attack anyone. The actual perpetrator was still free and uncuffed at this time.
3 - Preventing Evidence Destruction: When a suspect is highly likely to conceal, drop, or destroy evidence.
While no one was watching Digwa, he handed the murder weapon to his mother who then hid it in their home. Digwa also took videos of Henry desperately trying to escape before police arrived. These videos (to my knowledge) have not been released.
4 - Controlling Non-compliance: When the individual is actively resisting or failing to cooperate.
Once again, Henry could hardly get the words "I can't breathe" out, there was no risk of lack of compliance.
Why was Henry Nowak handcuffed?
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
This is outragious inequality. . . .
The whole of Britain should be ashamed, especially Royalty!
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
I have written to the Chief Constable of Hampshire Police demanding the immediate release of the Henry Nowak police bodycam footage.
National Police Chiefs' Council guidance does NOT preclude releasing body-cam footage where there is an ongoing investigation, stating:
"It is important that forces are seen to be open and transparent when responding to allegations of wrongdoing" and that
"police shouldn't create a perception that police are selectively choosing when to release footage to their advantage, thus potentially undermining public confidence".
THIS IS NOT GOING AWAY.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
Sorry isn’t good enough.
We need to see the body-worn footage and these officers need to face consequences.
The treatment of this murdered student, in his dying moments, is a national scandal.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
Anywhere will do for Andy.
This expensive by-election is all about his own personal ambition.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
So far Starmer’s efforts to save his skin have been a classic case study in how not to save your skin:
The most unpopular Labour PM in history (Starmer) calls in aid the second most unpopular Labour PM in history (Brown).
With most Labour MPs despising you and willing to grant you, at most, a civilised stepping down over some months, you say you’ll be in power for a decade. Labour MPs’ worst nightmare.
You commission a propaganda film of you, Brown, Rachel Reeves and Harriet Harman looking smug and self-satisfied in the Downing Street garden, complete with meaningful music. How divorced from public opinion can you be?
You signal you’re fresh out of new blood (Brown? Harman?) and new ideas (getting close to the EU is the best you can come up with — hardly a game changer).
You think a ‘reset’ speech (again!) can turn things round? You’re truly delusional.
THE END.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
I don't normally publish conversations with Downing Street but this was my initial exchange with Downing Street's then director of communications over Mandelson failing vetting on 11 September last year.
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
Excellent thread, this. Something I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about…
The British state is run by people who have never been fired, never missed a number, never had a client scream at them, never stayed up until 3am working on a deal, or repricing a book because Tokyo opened badly.
They have never experienced CONSEQUENCE. Ever.
THAT is the single most important fact in British public life.
The pipeline is so uniform and mediocre it scarcely needs describing:
- School
- PPE or adjacent
- Civil Service fast stream or a Think Tank research role
- Spell as local councillor to appear “grounded,”
- Then a safe seat and a red box before 40
At no point has the market ever called them a moron.
At no point has a P&L told them their idea was shit.
The feedback loop that every private sector professional takes for granted simply does not exist in their world.
This matters because policy is NOT an essay. It IS a trade. Every regulation has a cost, every tax has a behavioural response, every intervention has second and third order consequences.
In markets, if you misread convexity you get carried out. In government, you get reshuffled to a different department.
The incentive structure could not be more perfectly designed to retain the incompetent and repel the capable.
Anyone with genuine commercial talent is earning multiples of a ministerial salary by their early thirties. So the applicant pool self selects for people for whom the title is the reward because they could never command that status where performance is measured.
The think tank ecosystem makes it worse.
IPPR, the Resolution Foundation, JRF and the rest function as ideological finishing schools and revolving doors. They produce people fluent in the language of policy who have never implemented anything. They can model a distributional impact assessment in their sleep but could not run a corner shop at profit.
This is NOT intelligence. It is pattern matching within a closed system that never tests its own assumptions because everyone in it shares the same priors.
The civil service compounds it further. The fast stream rewards generalism, rotating you through departments every 18 to 24 months to develop “breadth,” which in practice means you never develop depth.
A Treasury official who helped design a tax policy in 2019 is working on transport by the time it starts distorting behaviour in 2022. Nobody owns the outcome.
The private sector has one thing the state fundamentally lacks: a kill switch.
Bad companies go bust.
Bad traders get sacked.
The state just absorbs failure, reclassifies it as “lessons learned,” and promotes the people responsible.
The compound effect of thirty years of this is a permanent class institutionally incapable of delivering growth or even understanding why the private sector they depend on for revenue keeps shrinking under their stewardship. This is what we have, right now.
You cannot fix this with better people inside the same system. The system selects against competence, insulates against feedback, and rewards survival over performance.
Every parliament is just a fresh rotation of the same profile through the same machine expressing the same surprise when nothing improves.
We need parallel institutions to be built by the guy or gal staying up til 3am repricing the book. The risk taker. The entrepreneur.
Then we gradually phase the existing sclerotic failed structures out.
That’s how we win.
Make Britain Great Again 🇬🇧 💪
There’s been a lot of talk about how Labour ministers aren’t qualified and have little experience relevant to the position in cabinet they hold
So let’s look at one such example
Bridget Phillipson
She was born on 19 December 1983 in Gateshead
1/5 dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic…
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
Don’t buy Cadbury till they stop using this palm oil! We want proper chocolate back
Jonathan Fry 🏴🇬🇧 retweeted
Hello @AngelaRayner
Podcast sounds good. Anyway:
• Where did you actually live between 2007 and 2015? If it was Vicarage Road, why do multiple neighbours say they never saw you there? If it was Lowndes Lane, why were you registered on the electoral roll at a different address for six years?
• Why did you give Lowndes Lane as your address when re-registering your children’s birth certificates in October 2010, just weeks after your wedding, while you were simultaneously registered to vote at Vicarage Road? Which document was wrong?
• Why was your brother Darren Bowen listed on the electoral roll at Lowndes Lane with your ex-husband Mark Rayner for several years? Was he living there as a tenant? And if you had moved out of Vicarage Road, was that property claiming a single person’s council tax discount it was not entitled to?
• Why was Labour reported to have used party funds to hire Jonathan Peacock KC to review your stamp duty position on your Hove flat? And given that you also claimed in 2024 to have taken “expert tax and legal advice” confirming no capital gains tax was owed on the council house sale, who paid for that advice? Did Labour cover that as well?
Exclusive:
Angela Rayner is preparing to launch a podcast called Beyond the Bubble as she seeks to broaden her appeal before a potential Labour leadership contest
The former deputy prime minister has interviewed Lord Gove, the former Tory cabinet minister, as the star guest on the pilot, which is focused on housing
Rayner and Gove both served as housing secretaries and the two recently gave evidence together to a parliamentary committee about leasehold reform. Both championed legislation to give leaseholders and renters more rights while they were in office
The two are understood to get on well despite their political differences. Gove, who is now editor of The Spectator, is said to have joked to Rayner after their appearance before MPs that she had been like Annie Lennox to his Dave Stewart from Eurythmics
In the first episode Rayner conducts other interviews with people across the country about housing. The show was produced by Global, which owns the radio station LBC, but it is not yet clear if it has signed off a full series
thetimes.com/article/468db5a…




































