Joan Quinn Eastman

🤔So, is it “trick or treat” for “Maura the horror” Healey this Halloween?  #MikeUrban asks a lot of great questions here‼️ 😳👻😱 Let’s have some fun and see if you can find more questions below⁉️ 👀 This could get scary 🧟‍♂️ Tally below. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 Is this (1) woman with two kids, (2) whose home was reportedly wrecked by an affair (3) with the “Queen of Cover-ups,” (4) actually the first lady of Massachusetts? (5) Maura “Liar” Healey claims their relationship began “months” after (6) the acrimonious break-up of a 14-year relationship with a judge (7), who was later appointed to Chief Justice. (8) And yet, Joanna Lydgate worked with Healey at the AG’s office, eventually becoming deputy chief (9) for 10 years during the entire span of Healey’s relationship with the judge. (10) Lydgate left the AG’s office in 2010, allegedly before her relationship with Healey began. (11) Healey did not make their relationship public until days after her inauguration (12) dubbing her First “Partner”/Lady of Massachusetts. Corresponding Trick or Treat Tally       1.  Trick – Lydgate was married to a man and had affair with a woman 2.  Trick – The affair broke up a family with children  3.  Trick – “Queen of Cover-ups” hid her relationship  4.  Treat – Reward her in title only the first lady of Massachusetts (they are not married) 5.  Trick – To throw off the scent of overlapping relationships Healey claims their relationship began “months” after she and the judge parted ways 6.  Trick – Why announce the break-up? To cover for the affair with the woman who was having an affair on her husband? 7.  Treat – Nominated by Healey to the Supreme Judicial Court — later appointed to Associate Justice 8.  Treat – Worked for years with Healey at the AG’s office, promoted to deputy chief  9.  Trick – Lydgate worked with Healey on and off for roughly 10 years of her 14-year relationship with the judge 10.  Treat – Gets promotion and leaves a year later “before” her relationship with Healey began 11.  Trick – Healey hides the relationship, keeping it undercover until after her inauguration  12.  Treat – Healey dubs her partner the First “Partner”/Lady of Massachusetts, even though they are not married Is this the @ClownParty0000 you what you want running the state @MassDems ? @massgop @agenturban #MAPOLI youtu.be/XfGtVWcX_1U?is=y81n…

Is transitioning truly “Sofie‘s Choice?” Her own family does not know what Sophie Kutzko truly wants. They had no idea gender issues were so much as a consideration until after she was already gone from their home at age 15 almost 2 years ago. The anguish of Arlene Kutzko over the loss of her daughter, Sophie, to DCF—where she has begun her gender transition—has been amplified by a delayed trial and a manipulated legal claim. Arlene has suffered a parent’s worst nightmare: sending a child off to school one morning and then being informed that she’s gone by the end of the day—but not in the final sense. Gone in such a way that brings with it additional levels of pain and anxiety. Arlene’s daughter is alive; she knows she is in distress, she wants to help her baby—but she can’t reach her. It’s an anxiety dream from which Arlene cannot awaken. This mother has been cruelly cut off from nurturing and caring for her child, as she did for 15 years before DCF took custody, and “became her parents.” And before the shock of her daughter being gone had been fully realized, Arlene’s husband was suddenly gone, too. In what Joseph Kutzko says was “like a bomb dropped” on his family, Sophie‘s father was taken away by the police, the same day, in handcuffs, in front of his stunned wife and adult son. He spent the night in jail, faced assault charges the next morning, and was released. The charges were soon after unsupported. Arlene, her husband Joseph, and their son Walter, for reasons that cannot be explained, have a no-contact order imposed upon them. They stand accused of not supporting Sophie’s choice to transition when, according to the family, the first they heard of it was after Sophie was already gone. None of the three has had a single conversation with Sophie about it, contrary to what has otherwise been reported. The restraining order itself under Massachusetts General Laws chapter 209A was obtained for Sophie by the well-funded Boston legal group, the Victim Rights Center. Shockingly, the judge in the Marlboro District Court made the order permanent after only three months. And as if they have not suffered enough, DCF is cruelly contending that Sophie’s distraught mother violated the 209A by simply answering a compassionate hypothetical question during an interview with Lauren Green. The Chief Religion Correspondent for Fox News pre-recorded an interview with the Kutzkos for approximately 10 minutes. One of Green’s questions was—if you could talk to your daughter, what would you say? The interview was edited down to two minutes, to fit within the time constraints of the newscast, the question was cut. See the report that aired during the September 14 Fox News’ America’s Newsroom with Bill Hemmer here: givesendgo.com/Kutzko?utm_so… A continuous copy of the raw footage containing the question and answer together has been requested from Fox News, to be shown at the show-cause hearing on the alleged 209A violation scheduled for November 5, in Waltham District Court. If the video is viewed, it will show that Arlene Kutzko did not initiate direct contact as alleged. The parents’ spokesperson, Atty. Vernadette Broyles, called this “an attack on a grieving immigrant mother.” bostonherald.com  The threat to Sophie’s mother is real. The magistrate will determine whether there is probable cause to issue a criminal complaint. If none is found, the matter is dropped; otherwise, Arlene will be arraigned and prosecuted. Think about this perversion of justice—if convicted, Arlene Kutzko could face 2½ years in jail—for saying that she loves and misses her own daughter. With their custody trial now pushed off until next spring, the Kutzkos are racing against time. Sophie turns 18 in April just weeks from the court date—that is if the trial, originally scheduled for late, November is not delayed again. @amade @FoxNews @LaurenGreenFox @kutzko84686 @BillHemmer @AmericaNewsroom @ConsiderMeDunn @stacepochalypse