Julian Hodgson (@ju25378) profile picture
Joined July 2025
Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)Photo by Julian Hodgson (@ju25378)
Julian Hodgson retweeted
When you see it... Brilliant 🤣
32
113
8
943
79,774
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Back the Cods as we return to League Two action against Bristol Rovers at Highbury on Saturday. 🎟️ Adult tickets start from £24, with under-16s able to attend from just £9. Secure your place online now. 🔴 Buy Online 🔗 zurl.co/k36f3
4
4
30
5,644
Julian Hodgson retweeted
“Could he just outline where that reallocated capital spending will come from?” Cue this rant at the Despatch Box from Wes Streeting to hide his discomfort at not knowing the answer to a straightforward question. Stroppy, brittle and clearly not across the detail. Today the new Defence Secretary was found out. Perhaps he should spend less time on his profile and more time getting on top of his brief? The questions haven’t even got difficult yet.
59
111
15
638
103,288
proper ground with character not a soulless bowl like your gaff also Fleetwood is one of the best aways, day out and piss up in Blackpool, good chippy scran, proper stuff
Joke away end yesterday aswell..
2
1
1
51
2,886
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Back to League Two business on Saturday. 💼
2
4
47
3,279
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Moments like this is why we watch the beautiful game of football🥹❤️
Replying to @tobyasky
Fleetwood fans all came on the pitch. Champions League final for them 😭😎
29
1,453
22
16,591
170,981
Found a new love for Town? ❤️ We’re now accepting international orders through our online store, so supporters can show their red and white wherever they are in the world. 🌍 Shop online by heading to the link in our bio. 👆
3
8
1
91
8,779
Julian Hodgson retweeted
This is one of the videos British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmoud deleted from her website. One she would like you to forget about.
504
4,657
220
7,282
213,079
Julian Hodgson retweeted
"Who is bankrolling Nigel Farage's party?" asks Bridget Phillipson. "Labour will protect our democracy from foreign influence." Right. Same question back. Who is bankrolling Labour, and the machine around it? Gary Lubner. South African. Former Autoglass chief. Millions. Lord Alli. Buys the clothes, lends the flat. George Soros. Money into Best for Britain and Fair Vote, routed through a London outpost, which is how a foreign fortune gets round a ban on foreign donations. Pierre Omidyar. French-Iranian, eBay founder, funding the campaign groups. Bill Gates. In for the photo call. Swedish philanthropists. Bloomberg. And Verbatim, which made the Channel 4 sting she is riding, is itself funded from abroad. So the watchdog on foreign money is on foreign money. And those are off the top of my head. No research. Give me an afternoon and the list fills a page. So the party promising to protect democracy from foreign influence is up to its neck in it, legally, through the same door, and has proposed no cap that would inconvenience a single person in the room. They held a drinks party for them in Downing Street. The question is not who is bankrolling Farage. It is why Labour thinks the answer changes depending on whose name is on the cheque. "Protect our democracy from foreign influence." They would not know where to start.
Who is bankrolling Nigel Farage's party? What interests are they seeking to advance? Are they acting in Britain's best interests? Reform UK are engulfed in sleaze and scandal. Labour will protect our democracy from foreign influence. independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
335
2,536
123
6,869
106,813
What Socialism Is. Socialism is not a real model to be applied in the world – it is a contradictory rhetoric used to gain power over people, by manipulating those who are easiest to manipulate. It is anti-life, because it contradicts reality. Its contradictions stay harmless only as long as it stays on paper. Try to implement it, and they come due. It postulates equality – and produces the most unequal societies of all: the nomenklatura in its special shops, everyone else in the queue. It says it frees the workers – and in 1980, ten million Polish workers had to rise up against the workers' state. It postulates abundance – and gets rid of the people who produce it. Venezuela, sitting on the largest oil reserves in the world, watched its people lose an average of eleven kilos in a single year. It says the state will wither away – and builds the biggest state in history. It postulates peace – and needs an enemy for every failure. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Needs, of course, especially of the immoral, are unlimited. Ability is punished. Someone has to resolve these contradictions. In socialism, that someone is the police, by force. When the theory says one thing and reality another, it is never the theory that gets arrested. That is why it is anti-life. Life works by getting reality right: every living thing survives because it reads the world correctly. Socialism switches off the instruments – prices that say what is scarce, profits and losses that say what works, free speech that says what is wrong. A society that can no longer see where it is going ends up where socialist societies always end up: first the queue, then the famine and the camp. And yet it keeps coming back. Why? Because socialism is not an economic theory that failed. It is a technique of power that works. The economics always fails. The rhetoric never does – on those easiest to manipulate, and for those who rise by manipulating them. Socialism has never delivered what it says. It has always delivered what it is for: power.
In 1987, Lula explained how to implant socialism in Brazil: "It will be an arduous job of 30 to 50 years, even with a revolution, because we must prepare the consciousness of the Brazilian people." That is Gramsci almost word for word: first the consciousness, then the power.
45
539
39
1,570
54,501
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Remember when Antoinette Fernandez (Green Party speaker of Hackney Council) bemoaned the British bombardment of Lagos, forcing her great great maternal grandfather from power? She forgot to mention the reason why. And you won't hear a single peep of apology from this lot about it.
40
606
19
4,755
144,715
Julian Hodgson retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt. “I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes? Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime. We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose. We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently. In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland. In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms. We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion. We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism. Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life. Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force. That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people. Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison. This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs. Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
321
3,022
162
15,300
264,957
Julian Hodgson retweeted
He told a 65% Leave town he'd respect Brexit, then got the job and started measuring up for Brussels. Every Brexit-backing seat should remember Makerfield.
183
1,578
39
4,817
30,453
Possibly the best thing you’ll read all day
FT comments never miss. I don’t think I’ve read such a rational analysis of the situation we’re in for a long time.
21
76
5
1,107
120,439
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Let this tweet scorch your retinas. If you don't already, you'll come to see this as an absolute truth.
Andy Burnham is the platonic midwit. No wonder he's popular with a portion of the electorate. He's the personification of representative government, in that he represents the British public in all its idiocy, shallowness and unseriousness - but he can emote, so it's fine.
14
52
3
483
20,640
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Let's remember what Gorbechev said about The EU 👇👇👇
36
481
11
1,407
11,069
Julian Hodgson retweeted
The War Criminal Campbell has smeared me and @TuckerCarlson tonight on X. When I knew him he was the willing accomplice at the @DailyMirror of Ghislane Maxwell’s father Robert, usually just carrying his hat and coat. So besotted was he with the greatest thief of the century he broke the nose of a Guardian journalist in Parliament for celebrating the fat thief’s trip to Davy Jones Locker. Later he served the War Criminal Tony Blair with similar gusto. He lied and cheated his way through the Blair era, deceiving parliament and people and world opinion equally. None of this has seen him banished from Labour or the great British media and Establishment society, quite the contrary. That he has turned his grease-gun on Carlson and me says more about the Epstein class who still rule than it does about us.
217
1,406
46
6,382
183,418
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Esto es incorrecto. El Reino Unido tenía una reivindicación de soberanía sobre las islas desde mucho antes y respondió a lo que consideraba una ocupación argentina ilegal. Sin embargo, en 1833 no expulsó a la población, sino únicamente al gobernador y a la guarnición militar. Las fuentes contemporáneas son inequívocas al respecto. Todavía podemos consultar la orden del capitán James Onslow a José María Pinedo, del 2 de enero de 1833: “I have received directions to exercise the rights of sovereignty over these islands. Being my intention to hoist the flag of Great Britain, I request you to lower yours and withdraw your force together with all objects belonging to your Government.” Fíjate en la redacción exacta: “withdraw your force” (retirar vuestras fuerzas), no expulsar a todos los habitantes. Esto queda confirmado por otros testimonios contemporáneos, incluidos los de argentinos. Pinedo informó de que Onslow ordenó: “Los habitantes que quisiesen voluntariamente quedar, que serían respetados ellos y sus propriedades como anteriormente.” Jean Simon, capataz francés de los gauchos de Vernet, dictó una carta en Puerto Luis apenas tres meses después. Escribió: “El Comandte Pinedo dixo á la gente qe el qe quisiera ir pa Bs Ays., qe lo llevara y llevó algs peones.” Cuando Darwin visitó las islas en 1834 a bordo del HMS Beagle, describió las consecuencias de aquellos acontecimientos: “The gauchos remained” (los gauchos permanecieron). Tenemos una imagen clara de lo que ocurrió. La guarnición se retiró, junto con sus familias y varios residentes extranjeros. Algunas decenas de trabajadores y sus familias permanecieron en las islas. En cualquier caso, nada de esto es relevante. Si casi 200 años de presencia ininterrumpida no bastan para establecer un derecho a la autodeterminación, entonces casi todos los mapas del mundo serían inválidos. Estados Unidos, por ejemplo, perdería la mayor parte de su territorio (la Ley de Traslado Forzoso de los Indios, Indian Removal Act, es contemporánea de estos acontecimientos). Por cierto, escribo como un convencido amigo de Argentina y un gran admirador de su presidente. Nuestros países estuvieron muy unidos hasta que Juan Perón decidió avivar una cuestión que, hasta entonces, había permanecido prácticamente dormida. Deberíamos ser capaces de dejar a un lado la disputa sobre la soberanía y colaborar en otros asuntos.
Replying to @DanielJHannan
Porque lo que hizo UK en 1833 fue una suplantación de población. Obligó a todos los Argentinos a irse y trajo población de origen. De ahí que la ONU no dé por válido su referéndum.
75
125
3
710
41,296
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Some of them like to dish it out but they’re not so keen when it’s served right back at them
282
1,223
47
6,219
177,031
Julian Hodgson retweeted
Below is a video of Sam Beckman who spat at and showed the finger to a statue of the murdered MP Sir David Amess. The pro-Palestinian lives in Westcliff-On-Sea in Essex, let's make him famous.
The pro-Palestinian scumbag who spat on Sir David Amess’s statue is Sam Beckman from Westcliff-on-Sea. He changed his account name the first time he was exposed. "The best of humanity,” according to many politicians, including Labour MPs.
497
5,093
138
10,598
122,523