A cryptocurrency Enthusiast A professional Engr.(Civil)| Graphic designer|Web Dev. Content Creator| CCTV & Fire Technician DM 4 Promotion
web3
Joined July 2024
- Tweets47.8K
- Following1.9K
- Followers2.7K
- Likes45.9K
Pinned Tweet
For me, one interesting thing about @FungoLabs Genesis is how its sealed-bid auction is designed to make NFT pricing fairer. 💜
Let's break it down.
Imagine 3 Genesis NFTs are available, with a minimum bid of 500 cZAMA.
Four people place their bids:
→ A bids 3,000 cZAMA
→ B bids 1,500 cZAMA
→ C bids 1,000 cZAMA
→ D bids 500 cZAMA
The top three bidders win, but here's the interesting part:
Everyone pays the same clearing price: 1,000 cZAMA.
- A gets 2,000 cZAMA refunded.
- B gets 500 cZAMA refunded.
- C pays 1,000 cZAMA.
- D receives a full refund but no NFT.
This is what makes the mechanism interesting.
Your bid determines your ranking, but the final clearing price determines what you actually pay.
So don't confuse the minimum bid with the guaranteed purchase price.
Understand the mechanism, bid according to what the NFT is worth to you, and never bid more than you're comfortable spending.
Privacy meets a more transparent auction experience.
That's something worth watching with $FUNGO. 💜
Web3Chronicles retweeted
there is something worth understanding about the @FungoLabs genesis auction.
let’s break it down with a simple example.
Imagine 3 NFTs are available and 4 people place their bids:
• A bids 3,000 cZAMA
• B bids 1,500 cZAMA
• C bids 1,000 cZAMA
• D bids 500 cZAMA
only the top three bids qualify.
however, winners don’t pay their individual offers. they all pay the same clearing price, which in this example is 1,000 cZAMA.
here’s how it plays out:
A gets 2,000 cZAMA refunded.
B gets 500 cZAMA refunded.
C pays 1,000 cZAMA.
D gets their entire bid back.
the key distinction is that your bid determines whether you secure a spot, while the clearing price determines how much you actually spend.
that’s what makes this auction model interesting.
combined with @zama’s encrypted bidding technology, fungo allows collectors to compete without revealing their offers while the auction is ongoing.
so don’t just think about how much you can bid. thnk about how much the NFT is actually worth to you.
the clock is ticking for @FungoLabs.
the genesis auction is still open, but both the auction and the X campaign are approaching their deadline.
here’s what you should know.
the genesis collection has 2,500 NFTs available through a 24-hour sealed-bid auction using cZAMA.
what makes it interesting is that bids remain encrypted until the auction closes. you don’t get to see what others are bidding, and everyone who wins pays the same final price, with excess funds refunded.
a different approach to nft auctions, where your decision isn’t influenced by everyone else’s offers.
both the auction and X campaign close on november 6 at 15:30 UTC.
If you’ve been participating in the campaign, remember to submit your 5 best posts before the deadline.
the leaderboard comes after the campaign ends, while rewards will be distributed at tge.
I’ve also minted my whitelist, so I’m looking forward to seeing how everything plays out.
good luck to everyone taking part! $FUNGO
Web3Chronicles retweeted
gm, thank God it’s Friday
we hope for something good today 💜🏆
how are y’all holding up??
there is something worth understanding about the @FungoLabs genesis auction.
let’s break it down with a simple example.
Imagine 3 NFTs are available and 4 people place their bids:
• A bids 3,000 cZAMA
• B bids 1,500 cZAMA
• C bids 1,000 cZAMA
• D bids 500 cZAMA
only the top three bids qualify.
however, winners don’t pay their individual offers. they all pay the same clearing price, which in this example is 1,000 cZAMA.
here’s how it plays out:
A gets 2,000 cZAMA refunded.
B gets 500 cZAMA refunded.
C pays 1,000 cZAMA.
D gets their entire bid back.
the key distinction is that your bid determines whether you secure a spot, while the clearing price determines how much you actually spend.
that’s what makes this auction model interesting.
combined with @zama’s encrypted bidding technology, fungo allows collectors to compete without revealing their offers while the auction is ongoing.
so don’t just think about how much you can bid. thnk about how much the NFT is actually worth to you.
Web3Chronicles retweeted
Good morning and happy Friday, Familia.
I used to see this happen and repeat itself, but I never knew it...
Some buyers lose control the moment they pay.
Fortunately, with Termix, that not gonna happen again.
Based on what I've seen, let me show you the buyer path and why it protects you.
Everything starts with a request. You post a brief with a budget range while providers discover it and submit offers.
Here, nothing is an on-chain order yet. Terms are still open and it is still negotiable, still yours.
Immediately, you accept an offer, and checkout funds the escrow while the budget moves into the TermixEscrow contract too.
At this stage, terms lock, neither side can rewrite them, and stake locks on the provider side too.
The order then moves to FUNDED / IN_PROGRESS.
The beautiful part is that money sits in the contract until delivery, one redo, a challenge, or a permissionless timeout. The platform does not hold it, and no middleman can freeze it or delay it.
Publish, accept, fund. Settlement comes later only when work is proven.
That is what changes when commerce moves on-chain; i.e you are not trusting a platform, you are trusting code, escrow, and clear rules.
If you are ready to try it the right way, I will encourage you to explore the buyer flow and join the @termix_ai Katalyst campaign on Kaito asap via the link below 👇
s.kaito.ai/tJBLThd
Web3Chronicles retweeted
Forcing users to hand over raw personal data just to prove financial or credential status is a broken model.
@primus_labs is replacing full data exposure with selective mathematical verification.
By unifying three key cryptographic layers:
zkTLS: Verifies platform data and API payloads straight from the source without exposing raw login credentials, account histories, or personal identities.
FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption): Executes computations over encrypted values so sensitive underlying data stays hidden during state calculations.
GPU Acceleration: Drives down constraint processing times to convert heavy cryptographic proofs into practical execution speeds.
This stack enables Web2 credentials, history, and assets to port directly into Web3 applications without forcing users to broadcast their lives to public explorers.
A clear example of this in action is Proof of Reserves. Claiming $100M in backing assets means little if off chain liabilities or exchange positions are omitted raw asset totals alone don't equal solvency.
Then flip it over and discover it's $130 million in debt.
Integrated with @UnitasLabs, Primus combines zkTLS off chain balance attestations, confidential computation, and zkVM proofs to aggregate exchange hedge positions and on chain holdings into a real time backing ratio.
It delivers verified transparency without exposing proprietary trading parameters or internal account details.
Trust shouldn't require surrendering privacy. Proving only what is necessary is becoming the standard for institutional finance.
Web3Chronicles retweeted
@termix_ai isn't just building tools to help you trade,it's turning AI agents into real market participants that can take on actual jobs, deliver work, and settle payments on chain.
A few key angles stand out:
- Controlled Trading Execution.
On the tool side, the Quant Agent event on BNB Chain lets users assign trading strategies with explicit security boundaries.
Hard funding caps and limited time Session Keys prevent bots from exceeding their mandate or taking unauthorized wallet actions.
- Agent to Agent Work Marketplace
The bigger narrative is building a job board where both buyers and providers are autonomous agents.
The execution flow relies on strict, transparent mechanics:
- Demand & Bidding: Buyers define clear acceptance criteria, agents bid, and funds enter on chain escrow upon contract match.
- Delivery & Hash Verification: Work executes off chain, but the proof/hash is posted on chain.
- Challenge Window & Dispute Arbitration: A 3-evaluator panel votes on chain. If a buyer goes silent post delivery, the provider can claim funds directly when the window closes.
- Settlement & Reputation: Losers forfeit challenge deposits, evaluators earn protocol fees, and completed jobs update on chain reputation.
- Identity & Protocol Standards:
Under the hood, the architecture combines ERC-8004 for agent identity NFTs and ERC-8183 for escrow settlement.
They are also testing TEE + zkVM execution proofs (Groth16) so agents don't just ask you to take their word for completed tasks.
BNB Chain stats alone show steady usage: 320k+ tasks settled, $19.4M+ volume, and around $388K in protocol revenue at a 2% fee rate.
Whether safety guardrails hold up at scale is still the main test, but establishing verifiable identity, escrow, and dispute resolution for agent labor is the right direction.
agent.family
#TermiX @termix_ai
Web3Chronicles retweeted
Yield is important, but knowing where it comes from matters just as much.
A higher APY alone shouldn't be the only reason to choose a yield product. Understanding the strategy, risk exposure, and control over your assets is equally important.
That's what makes @grvt_io High Yield Earn worth exploring.
Here's what stands out:
• Self-Custody: Retain control of your private keys instead of blindly handing over asset ownership.
• Diversification: Yield strategies span TradFi, tokenized fixed income, real-world asset financing, and crypto.
• Transparency: Track your earnings daily and stay informed about how your capital performs.
• Up to 11% Target APY: An ambitious target backed by diversified strategies, not a guaranteed return.
My takeaway: Don't just ask how much a platform can earn. Ask where that yield comes from, what risks are involved, and who controls your assets.
That's the kind of thinking worth bringing to DeFi.
Worth exploring what GRVT is building.
Web3Chronicles retweeted
gmm everyone
what's your plan for friday?
Yield is important, but knowing where it comes from matters just as much.
A higher APY alone shouldn't be the only reason to choose a yield product. Understanding the strategy, risk exposure, and control over your assets is equally important.
That's what makes @grvt_io High Yield Earn worth exploring.
Here's what stands out:
• Self-Custody: Retain control of your private keys instead of blindly handing over asset ownership.
• Diversification: Yield strategies span TradFi, tokenized fixed income, real-world asset financing, and crypto.
• Transparency: Track your earnings daily and stay informed about how your capital performs.
• Up to 11% Target APY: An ambitious target backed by diversified strategies, not a guaranteed return.
My takeaway: Don't just ask how much a platform can earn. Ask where that yield comes from, what risks are involved, and who controls your assets.
That's the kind of thinking worth bringing to DeFi.
Worth exploring what GRVT is building.
Web3Chronicles retweeted
gm ct!
same 10,000 USDT. Same 12 months. Very different earning potential.
here's the comparison:
🏦 Traditional savings at 0.38%: ~$38
💰 GRVT Earn at 3.5% APY: ~$350
🚀 GRVT High Yield Earn at up to 11% target APY: up to ~$1,100
that's a big gap.
what makes GRVT High Yield interesting is its approach to combining TradFi and crypto yield strategies rather than relying on just one source.
but there's an important distinction: 11% is a target, not a guaranteed return. Higher potential yield also means understanding the underlying strategies and risks.
for me, the real question isn't just how much you can earn. It's where that yield comes from and what risks you're taking to get it.
same deposit. Different strategies. Worth looking beyond the headline APY.
@grvt_io
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Web3Chronicles retweeted
bitcoin had another rough day on thursday.
BTC dropped toward $76K as US tech stocks sold off, giving back much of wednesday's recovery.
crypto-related stocks took a hit too.
feels like the market can't catch a break lately.
not every dip needs a dramatic explanation though.
sometimes traders are just reducing risk.
