Dan Bilzerian told Joe Rogan he beat one man for $54,000,000 at poker, over 8 to 9 months. Some of poker's best players still think the money came from his father. In the video below, he tells Rogan how the games worked, and what he was on while he played. He says it started in college. He sold 3 guns for $750, turned it into $10,000 on a gambling boat, and had $187,000 at the Bellagio 3 weeks later. By 2012, he says, he was playing private heads-up games against billionaires. At one point he had $18,000,000 on the table. One hand alone, he says, was worth $14 to 15 million. The man reportedly on the other side: billionaire Alec Gores. Pros later said Gores lost over $40,000,000 to him. Doug Polk publicly asked him to prove it. His theory: the money came from Dan's father, Paul Bilzerian, a former corporate raider who went to prison. Bilzerian denies it. He says he only got a trust fund at 35, years after the poker money. Poker pro Chance Kornuth backed part of the story. He says he coached Bilzerian for the Gores game, played at $5,000/$10,000 blinds. Gores has never confirmed the numbers. Poker genius, or trust-fund kid with a great story?

Opus 5.5 is a beast at motion design but... give it one link and it becomes a full mechanical animation studio • real 3D engines where every part is modeled and moves on its own • cinematic exploded views with smooth camera moves down to every bolt • cutaways and airflow you can follow through the whole engine I asked for a turboprop teardown. this is render #3 send this to your Claude: mechanica-atlas.vercel.app

I gave Claude Code one folder and 5 free repos. 20 minutes later I had 3 agents planning, coding and reviewing each other. someone mapped 300+ open-source agent tools on one page. most people bookmark it and never open it again. hand Claude Code one folder and 5 repos from that list, and it stops being a chatbot. it plans, splits the work between agents, remembers, runs code in a sandbox and logs every step. here's the whole stack: > make a folder called AGENTS, open Claude Code in it, add a CLAUDE.md with one rule: "plan first, run code only in the sandbox, log every step" > install Ollama, run ollama pull qwen3. a local model for the cheap subtasks. $0 per token, nothing leaves your laptop > pip install crewai, then crewai create crew research. tell Claude to give it 3 roles: planner, coder, reviewer > pip install mem0ai. now the crew remembers your project between sessions instead of starting from zero > pip install e2b-code-interpreter (free key). every piece of code the agents write runs in a sandbox, not on your machine > pip install agentops. one line in the script and you see every step, every tool call, every error 20 minutes of setup, and you have a crew instead of a chat window. all the repos: -> github.com/ollama/ollama -> github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI -> github.com/mem0ai/mem0 -> github.com/e2b-dev/E2B -> github.com/AgentOps-AI/agent… bookmark this and test asap

this sh*t is unreal. your second brain can work the night shift now, on Grok Bot's own computer, with your laptop closed three bots, three jobs: the collector files every link, PDF and voice note you drop into raw/ and never touches the original the writer turns it into wiki pages and links every page back to where it came from the checker wakes up on a nightly routine and hunts contradictions and stale pages → you wake up to one morning page: what came in, what changed, what looks wrong → two sources disagree: it flags you instead of quietly picking one → nothing new about a page for a month: it gets a "needs a fresh source" tag chat memory keeps summaries. files keep exactly what you wrote no page gets saved without three things: > what it says > which file proves it > the last night it was checked paste this into Grok Bot: "Build me a second brain with three bots. Collector saves every source to raw/ and never edits it. Writer keeps wiki/ updated with a source link on every page. Checker runs every night at 3am, finds contradictions and stale pages, and sends me one morning summary. Ask me before deleting or sending anything. Show me the folder structure first and wait for my ok." give it one project for a week before you hand it your whole life the full 7-step build is in the article below ↓

THIS IS GETTING F*CKING DANGEROUS You can run 20 Claude Code agents at the same time and put a second model on top that checks every word they write. None of them gets away with making stuff up You open the terminal: - 20 agents reading your files at once - Every claim checked against the source before it's saved - Anything without a real quote gets sent back - Everything lands in plain markdown folders The trick is the split: Opus does the work, a cheaper Haiku only decides if the claim is actually in the source. The loop keeps running until every claim passes This used to be a week of reading. Now it's two markdown files and one prompt Same Second Brain + agent swarm setup everyone keeps sharing. Full breakdown below ↓

It is becoming f*cking dangerous: Claude Code can turn a flat 2D drawing into a 3D part you edit with one number ok I did not expect CAD to be next no CAD license. one open-source Python library and a prompt give it a dimensioned drawing of a bracket. it reads every measurement, writes the part as code and keeps each dimension as a named parameter change hole_pitch from 40 to 55 and the whole part rebuilds around it my favorite part: the drawing didn't give the wall thickness. it stopped and asked instead of making one up the setup: → pip install cadquery (free parametric CAD in Python, exports STEP and STL) → open Claude Code in an empty folder → drop the drawing in as a PNG or PDF → paste this: "Turn this drawing into a parametric CadQuery model. 1. Extract every dimension, unit and constraint into a table, with where each one sits on the drawing. Mark anything missing or ambiguous and ask me before you use it. 2. Write part.py with every dimension as a named parameter at the top. No hardcoded numbers in the geometry. 3. Use a separate subagent to check the model against the drawing: overall size, hole positions, hole diameters, and that the result is one valid closed solid. 4. Export part.step and part.stl, plus report.md with each dimension, its value and pass or fail. 5. Show me how to change one parameter and rebuild." start with a simple part you can measure by hand passing these checks means the geometry matches the drawing. it says nothing about strength or how the part holds up under real load watch a flat drawing become an editable part below ↓

Holy sh*t. Grok Bot can watch you do a task for 10 minutes and turn it into a job that runs every night with the laptop closed i've done the same 7-tab morning research by hand more times than i want to admit. the fix was one button and 5 rules teach → review → add rules → test → approve → schedule the official docs are blunt: a taught task is only a draft skill. the demo never shows it what to do when something breaks so before night 1, give it the rules the demo missed: → source is down: report it, never reuse yesterday's data → data is stale: flag it and stop → send, delete, publish or buy: draft it and wait for my yes → step half done: say exactly which part finished → retry only if running it twice changes nothing then one test run, and check it stopped at the approval point. a test run does real work limits worth knowing: > up to 50 routines per bot > schedules at least 5 minutes apart > last 20 runs kept per routine > delete a routine and there's no undo Teach it once. Write the rules. Sleep. Paste this into Grok Bot right after you teach it, the full build is in the article below: "Review the skill you just learned from my demo: [TASK NAME] 1. List every step and how it could fail: missing source, stale data, login wall, duplicate, rate limit 2. For each failure write one rule: if [problem] then [action] 3. Put every send, delete, publish or purchase behind my approval 4. Run one test, stop at the first approval, show me the result Do not schedule anything until I confirm"

I read the jev-kit browser table three times. I was sure the decimal point was in the wrong place someone wired Claude Code and TypeSafe's Jev into one team, and the agent stopped paying a frontier model for every yes/no most people run agents in one of two ways: -> let one big model decide every click, every tool call and every sub-agent, and pay frontier prices for forks a cheap judge could name -> hardcode if/else rules that break the first time the task changes jev-kit splits the stack in two: > the writer: Claude writes the code, the drafts and the text in form fields > the judge: Jev returns a typed choice, score or yes/no with a confidence, in about 0.3 s warm > the guard: every tool call hits a rules table first, only the ambiguous ones reach Jev > the tier check: a sub-agent sent 2+ rungs too expensive gets blocked, cheaper type named > the belay: an agent that says "done" with no passing check gets sent back to verify and the numbers, all measured in the repo: > 9/9 browser goals for $0.0008 of Claude per run vs $0.1868 with Sonnet deciding > 98.2% tier-guard accuracy on 57 scored dispatches, zero false blocks > 33.2 ms added per tool call when no rule matches > 100% on the deny-capable rules eval, zero false denies Claude writes. Jev decides. run it in shadow mode for a week, read the log, then let the cheap judge take the calls

It is becoming f*cking dangerous: Claude Code agents stopped thinking about every yes/no and started handing it to a second brain TypeSafe built Jev, a model that never writes a single word. You give it a state and a typed question, and it returns a choice, a score or a yes/no with a confidence attached Someone wired it into Claude Code, measured everything and open-sourced the whole setup as jev-kit The split is one rule: if it creates → LLM. if it picks, scores or gates → Jev. if it does the thing → code Each link in the team got a clear scope of work: > Claude writes the code, the drafts, the briefings and the text in form fields > Jev picks the next worker, scores the draft and gates every tool call > plain code saves the files, hits the APIs and clicks the browser > a tier guard checks every sub-agent dispatch and blocks the ones 2+ tiers too expensive The danger is that a frontier model will happily burn 30 cents of tokens "thinking about" a fork it already knows how to name So every decision has a bar to clear: a block only fires at 0.80+ confidence with a 0.40 margin over the runner-up, and any error or timeout just lets the call through For every call, the log shows: the question that was asked the choice Jev made the confidence behind it whether the call was allowed, warned or blocked The results: on a browser agent, with Jev picking every click, it reached 9/9 goals for $0.0008 of Claude per run. With Sonnet deciding: the same 9/9 for $0.1868. The tier guard was right on 56 of 57 dispatches with zero false blocks If you want to run something similar, open Claude Code in your agent's repo and give it this command: Split this agent into a writer, a decider and an actor: 1. Find every place where the LLM answers yes/no, picks from a list or scores something. List each one with its file and line 2. Turn each one into a typed Jev question with explicit options and a confidence threshold 3. Keep the writing on Claude, keep side effects in plain code, and log every decision with its confidence 4. Run it in shadow mode first: log what Jev would decide, change nothing, then show me the diff It is wiser to start with one decision, the one your agent makes most often, and scale up from there You will need a TypeSafe API key for the Jev calls. jev-kit's installer also has a --check-only flag that prints the plan before it touches anything All 12 use cases and how to wire them are in the article below

THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSON IN THIS ROOM ISN'T THE ONE FILMING. IT'S THE ONE STANDING STILL. Living room. Green top, black skirt, bare feet on a black mat. He points at her eye, then puts a hand on her collarbone. You still think she looks like a doll. Look closer. The details change everything. Phones already up behind them. She does not move. That's the real product. Not a walker. Not a shift. A face that stays when he touches it, while everyone else records. But the sharper business isn't the hardware. It's the face that stays. One body, one pose, a room full of phones. The quoted post already split this. Labor sells a clock-in. This unit sells a body that holds still in a living room and never has to answer. The $16k walker clocks in. This one stands on a mat at about $1.5k to $4k and sells on whether the eye looks real when he points at it. Who is the room for: the people filming, or the one who bought the face?

THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSON IN THIS UNBOXING ISN'T THE DOLL. IT'S THE ONE WHO SENT THE PHOTO. Factory floor. Tall cardboard box. Foam blocks. Blonde bob, maroon top, white shorts. He points at the face, then the shorts. Guys, I gave this factory one photo, and look what they made. The skin detail is unreal. Would you actually order one. That's the real product. Not a walker. Not a shift. A face built from one photo, standing in foam, waiting for a yes. But the sharper business isn't the hardware. It's the face that stays. One photo becomes one body. New outfit, same features, same skin. The quoted post already split this. Labor sells a clock-in. This unit sells a body that never leaves the box until someone asks if they would buy it. The $16k walker clocks in. This one sits in foam at about $1.5k to $4k and sells on how real the skin looks under a finger. Who is the order for: the factory, or the person who sent the photo?

THE ONE THEY UNWRAP IS NOT THE ONE THAT WORKS THE WALKER IS RIGHT BEHIND HER ok wait expo floor black dress bare knees plastic still on the face he pulls it off real skin texture and gentle temperament hand on the shoulder exclusive warm company only for you white walker sitting in the back she never stands ngl most people stay on the peel not the unit nobody filmed ▹ what the floor is selling a face that takes a film skin he can grade with one hand a pose that photographs the same kneel as every other unit on the stand ▹ the surprise the quoted post already split this labor sells a shift this unit sells a face that stays the walker behind her is the $16k clock she is the presence product soft layer about $1.5k to $4k not the $50k to $150k gaze head not the $125k to $175k social body factories buy torque timelines buy the film coming off china already proved loneliness clears deposits faster than chores ▹ why the peel wins presence without rejection a face that stays a line that says exclusive and warm loyalty you can film a body that never clocks in and never has to so the demo people stop for is not the robot clearing a floor it is the film and the sentence that says only for you the walker was in frame the whole time nobody asked what it costs

HE CARRIES HER ACROSS THE ROOM SHE NEVER TAKES A STEP THAT IS THE WHOLE PRODUCT ok wait glass showroom city behind the windows beige dress, gold heels he lifts her sets her on the white sofa hands stay clasped cameras already up this lifelike companion brings you warm daily company do you like this delicate life companion she does not answer ngl the line is the sale not a function ▹ what the 8 seconds show a man doing the walking a body that holds a pose after he lets go a dress that photographs a crowd that films the sit, not a shift ▹ the quieter truth warm daily company that sentence is the sku no task no refusal no clock-in the sofa does the standing ▹ where it sits soft companion layer about $1.5k to $4k showroom menu above that, $5.9k to $25k not the $16k walker not the $50k to $150k gaze head not the $125k to $175k social body ▹ the split the quoted post already said it labor sells a shift this unit sells a face that stays when he sets it down factories buy torque this room buys a sit so the surprise he is the one who moved she is the one who stayed one clocks in the other waits on a cushion until somebody asks if you like her how long did you watch the dress before you noticed she never walked

HE PEELS THE FILM AND CALLS IT REAL SKIN SHE NEVER SITS UP ok wait white table black top, red pants plastic still on the midsection he lifts it full protection for the bionic skin then the hand goes flat on the belly it feels just like real human skin banner behind him says realistic companions she does not move ngl the test is the touch not a function ▹ what the 8 seconds actually show a body that stays on the table a man grading the silicone a film that came off for the camera a phone already filming from the left ▹ the quieter line protection for the skin not a shift not a walk not an answer the table does the standing ▹ where it sits soft companion layer about $1.5k to $4k showroom menu above that not the $16k walker not the $50k to $150k gaze head the quoted post already split this labor sells a clock-in this unit sells a belly that takes a hand so the surprise the film is the price the skin line is the sale she can feel real under his palm and still never leave the table how long did you watch the hand before you noticed she did not sit up

THE NOSE SPRINGS BACK. THAT IS THE WHOLE DEMO. ok wait expo floor phones already up he peels the last film off the hairline calls it transport then pinches the nose soft, returns to shape someone says no way he says that looks real white top, brown shorts she does not take a step ngl most people stay on the pinch not the receipt under it ▹ what the floor is selling hairline you can film a nose that gives skin that takes a finger a crowd that argues real or not the same posters behind her, same pose, same job ▹ the surprise the quoted post already split this labor sells a shift this unit sells a face that springs back $16k walker clocks in this one waits on a plinth while he grades the nose soft layer about $1.5k to $4k showroom $5.9k to $25k not the $50k to $150k gaze head not the $125k to $175k social body ▹ why the pinch wins presence without rejection a face that stays a test you can do with one finger loneliness that looks solved for 10 seconds so the demo people stop for is not a robot clearing a floor it is a nose that returns and a line that says that looks real

HOW YOUNG DOES THE FACE HAVE TO LOOK BEFORE NOBODY ASKS WHAT SHE CAN DO THE REMOTE ALREADY ANSWERED ok wait white plinth blonde, plaid skirt, black top he holds a clicker with an infinity mark incredibly lifelike smooth skin and movements perfect for any exhibition she stays on her knees ngl that is the wrong test the quoted post already split the market labor sells a shift this unit sells a face ▹ the face young wide eyes soft mouth choker built so the booth photographs not so she can clear a floor ▹ the remote movements are claimed the hand holding the clicker is the proof if she walked on her own he would not need it in frame ▹ the pose knees on the cube hands on the thigh other units behind her in the same job stand, sit, get filmed none of them clock in ▹ the line perfect for any exhibition that is the sku dwell, not laundry a body that holds eye contact long enough for the phone to come out where it sits soft layer, about $1.5k to $4k not the $16k walker not the $50k to $173k desktop head not the $125k to $175k social body the surprise factories buy torque this booth buys a kneel one gets a shift the other never leaves the cube the clicker is the whole capability how long did you watch the face before you noticed the remote