Lemurian🍍

We're live, working through the backlog. 🔥

Re: this RW stock character xosting on lock - he fancies himself a "flâneur" of sorts with the Monero to accessorize the Laguna Beach Fogey LARP. What happened, Blowdart, when you tried running your little "ops" on Chris Brunet? Didn't you freak the fuck out two seconds in?

Fun fact - I laid down a red line in 'Aesthetic Dead Ends' (on the stack) in mid 2024. Go read it. Martin (among others such as Solion) enthusiastically promoted it. He vibed with it - in the moment, at the time, when it was expedient. I had an inkling something was up with "this thing of ours." I wanted to set out an analytic consensus they'd sign onto before Trump round II began. I set out the broad sweep of politics and the key enablers for a successful Trump admin by the lights of a populist civic nationalism. But you see, you're supposed to say based things, not mean them, certainly not apply them when it matters. That's sick. That's perverse. A true Aryan copes, sells out, goes with the flow.

"It turns out we were full of shit, and when you found out, you didn't go along with it. That reflects poorly on your character, sir."

Don't get any splinters scraping the bottom of that barrel, Wacky Dog. You have a fypper page to farm and a shitcoin to pump. Cuck jokes > eking out internet dollars >the jewish science experiment back at yo crib. Your new life. Now that's a fuckin' gut buster in my book.

This clip helps us understand why liberals attain administrative privileges during the current phase of capitalism. If the NAU were your project (from which you stood to make billions), would you want a gaggle of racist chuds destabilizing race relations?

Suitcase trvke.

He intentionally misspelled "job" as "jewb." Yuge diff.

When it comes to Fuentes, I have my criticisms and differences methodological and ideological I have expanded upon elsewhere - but consider the following thought experiment: let's imagine he meets whatever ideal buffers the rightoid fusion state that compensates for their basic ego weakness. He's a 6'4 flaxen haired Anglo-Prot/Nietzschean blonde beast drawn from an old stock New England family, married to a smoke show wife, has no history of associating with insalubrious characters, and has remained consistently Trump critical from the get-go (can't accuse of him of flip-flopping). There are no traces of sussy moments or affections to level against him. He's basically Apollo with Northwest European characteristics. Do we believe such a "Nicholas Spring" (Anglo cognate for the root of Fuentes) would find a good faith hearing? Or do we think the polemical categories fired up to discredit him are a happy accident for the GOP/Trump/Vance/alt-zog attack dogs? While it doesn't thrill me a slightly off-White, Catholic, White ethnic has moved into pole position on the right, English fairmindedness compels me to evaluate his impact in the grander scheme of things according to these considerations. It what it is. I deal in reality, not the copes of izzatized e-fursonas enslaved to the occulted frames of gurus performing "negative therapy" their own followers. I'm happy in my own lane, and I don't advise aspirant elites to become AF groypers (although highborn groypers can be fellow travellers where common ground presents itself). Rather, we should see those headway enabling elements Fuentes has struck upon at scale as a competitive spur to our own program. And indeed, that's what we planetary Anglos have already started enacting in the Antipodean sector of the right; clearing out the deadwood, the ziggers, the shills for the populist failure mode, the jewish owned subversives (e.g., Jordan Knight, incubated by BAP), the slightest whiff of pro-Zionist tolerance or sentiment, and the anti-British hobbits. We'll expand across the Anglosphere in a holy cognitive war for the hearts and minds of our people, a great jihad by an uncompromising generation pivoting toward a golden path.