GAUSS - what the hell is it? tbh, I won't get deep into the technicals, because it's a lot - however, I scrapped the essential parts so everyone can understand the CORE idea 🗣️ TLDR = it's @RialoHQ 's smart, safe reconfiguration/upgrade mechanism, that helps devs/enginners evolve the blockchain (or any similar distributed system) without turning it OFF, like they would have to on traditional systems is it an acronym? not this time - I think it's named after Carl Friedrich Gauss (a famous mathematician) (if you remember this, it's probably enough imho) ────────────── PREMISE↙️ a blockchain needs TWO main jobs done by its computer nodes (validators) 1) agree on the order of transactions (the consensus) 2) execute those txs & update the log (balances, smart contracts, etc) but blockhains are also like an organism they have to add new stuff & remove what isn't working but in order to move forward with this they often have to change things like a) who the validators are (add or remove some) b) switch to a completely better consensus method (from PoW to PoS or vvers) c) refresh/upgrade the core rules typically, when you do this you often have to ↘️ ✖️ pause the whole chain ✖️ do risky migration steps ✖️ pause all txs & activity on dApps ────────────── GAUSS is different it goes around these limitations by using 2 separate LOGS <a DIRTY/internal log> it includes all the upgrade parts & coordination messages <a CLEAN log> only shows the real user transactions to the execution part so blockchain can keep functioning while upgrade is beeing prepared [ this is how an upgrade using GAUSS looks like ] →old team keeps working normally →new team prepares quietly in the background →they agree on one exact handover moment →new team takes over right after that moment →chain keeps working →almost no interruption to users ────────────── I like to think about it like upgrading your entire car's specs at a 10 sec pitstop during a F1 race, without even turning OFF the engine @itachee_x @soumeya @yann_hodique

won the why @liquidtrading over everything else ,, contest ( $30 and drip role secured ) would've been first place too if @ZhugeLyang didn't enter 😭. bro literally the only person who can stop me is someone I know in space for a long time 💀 anyway small win is still a win. appreciate everyone who read the post & Supported . got a lot more content coming still got things to prove lubu I'm coming for you 👀 . I’m tired was travelling straight 10h today ,Gud night. Gliquid. Big thanks @snwdnnn 💚

Ayooo frens GM , Gliquid 💚 yesterday we broke down @liquidtrading news feed how the swipe to trade feature works and how custom feeds let you filter exactly what you trade. today we're going even deeper most traders have no idea that the more you trade on Liquid the cheaper it gets. there's a full fee tier system built into the platform and almost nobody talks about it. here's the complete breakdown with real numbers. ↘️ { did my homework on this one every number in this post comes straight from Liquid's official documentation. if anything looks off drop it in the comments and I'll verify it. } 💸 First the basics : Liquid charges 0.05% or less on perp trades. But here's what most people don't know . your fees are based on your rolling 14 day trading volume. the more you trade across those 14 days the lower your fees get. and there are two types of fees to understand: ⟹ Taker fee you're taking liquidity from the market. you pay this. ⟹ Maker rebate you're adding liquidity to the market. you actually get paid back directly to your wallet on every trade. 🏆 The Tier System Base Perp Fees: Starting from zero volume here's exactly what you pay: ⟹ No tier — 0 volume — Taker 0.095% / Maker 0.065% ⟹ Tier 1 — $5M+ volume — Taker 0.090% / Maker 0.062% ⟹ Tier 2 — $25M+ volume — Taker 0.085% / Maker 0.058% ⟹ Tier 3 — $100M+ volume — Taker 0.080% / Maker 0.054% ⟹ Tier 4 — $500M+ volume — Taker 0.078% / Maker 0.050% ⟹ Tier 5 — $2B+ volume — Taker 0.076% / Maker 0.050% ⟹ Tier 6 — $7B+ volume — Taker 0.074% / Maker 0.050% Even at zero volume you're paying 0.095% taker. Compare that to Coinbase charging up to 4% on purchases. That's already a massive difference before you even unlock any tier. 💎 The Volume Discount Tiers Diamond to Wood On top of the base tiers Liquid also has volume discount tiers. Diamond being the lowest fees and Wood being the entry level. These tiers show different fee rates at the same volume level the fee differences are verified and real directly from their docs. Here's what the numbers look like at zero volume across tiers: ⟹ Diamond — Taker 0.0770% / Maker 0.0590% ⟹ Platinum — Taker 0.0815% / Maker 0.0605% ⟹ Gold — Taker 0.0860% / Maker 0.0620% ⟹ Silver — Taker 0.0883% / Maker 0.0628% ⟹ Bronze — Taker 0.0905% / Maker 0.0635% ⟹ Wood — Taker 0.0928% / Maker 0.0643% And Diamond tier at $7B+ volume drops all the way to: ⟹ Taker 0.0644% / Maker 0.0500% The higher your tier and the more you trade the cheaper every single trade gets. 🆓 Spot Trading — Zero Additional Fees For spot trading — actually buying the underlying asset like BTC, ETH or SOL: ⟹ Liquid charges zero additional fees on top of what Hyperliquid charges. ⟹ no markup. no hidden costs. exactly what Hyperliquid charges. At high spot volumes the maker fee eventually drops to zero completely. More clarity in next thread .

why @liquidtrading over everything else? honest answer ↘️ Gliquid Guys!! I've been in this space long enough to get burned by the usual stuff. platforms holding your funds, hidden fees eating into profits, limited assets, one bad day wiping everything because you were stuck on one venue with no way out I went through all of it, then I actually sat down and did the math on fees alone retail traders on Coinbase are bleeding 4% on every single trade $5K a month in volume that's $2,400 gone every year not from bad trades just from using the platform that number hit me harder than any loss I'd taken -------> then March 26 2025 happened Hyperliquid the best DEX in the game got hit by a coordinated attack on a token called JELLY $4.1M short position, price pumped 430% in hours their own vault absorbed $13.5M in unrealized losses. validators stepped in manually and force settled positions at a price they picked not the market price on a platform marketed as fully decentralized nobody hacked the code. but the idea that one venue could protect you from everything that got hacked. -------> that's the moment Liquid clicked for me not because of the marketing because the problem it solves is real and I had just watched it play out live. one interface routing across Hyperliquid, Ostium and Lighter at the same time your funds never leave your wallet. if one venue has a problem your trade still gets filled somewhere else that's not a feature that's just how trading infrastructure should work. Keep reading the next thread 👇🏻 @snwdnnn @Qurool13