Pinned Tweet
20?? Math ain’t mathing for many lol just realized I used to love combinatorics .
For anyone with more such problems @hamptonism try out 102 combinatorial problems by titu andreescu and get ur brain blown away
PDF:
rainymathboy.wordpress.com/w…
anon_x🕯️ retweeted
Why Pearl will Win
––––––––––––––––––
01:14 BTC is dying
03:24 Breaking up with my highschool girlfriend
06:51 Why it can work
09:35 Pearl's power footprint
12:45 AI capex > asic capex
15:00 FP8
19:00 Negative overhead
22:04 Elite team
23:06 Hashrate = hinge profile height
28:01 AI lab adoption
30:48 I want my MTV
32:31 Mark Knopfler shreds on guitar
35:52 Useful work vs Duplex work
38:32 Cheap verification is required for money
41:20 Can Pearl close the loop?
45:17 Addressing fundraise FUD
51:21 Risks
1:06:27 Pearl wins by becoming multi-denominational religion
Hey @ProprXYZ team and @louisregis I have been waiting for prediction markets funding accs since forever and just wanted to know if it’s in October as u guys have mentioned in AMAs or is it getting postponed.
Please let us know. Thanks in advance🙌
Damnn I love this feels like the initial stages of sci-fi lol
We’ve raised $1.3M from YC & Afore Capital so you never have to type or speak again.
Typing is slow. Talking into your computer is awkward. Subvocal fixes both
Our glasses give you the speed of speech without you making a sound or touching a keyboard.
It tracks your internal speech muscles with non-contact sensing and decodes silent, almost invisible mouthing into text at more than 200 words/min.
Pre-orders are now live at:
subvocal.co/preorder?utm_sou…
Tradfi gets the price they deserve for @HyperliquidX i.e, 3 digit minimum for all CT if haven’t had any exposure to $hype until now it’s better to search for other jobs.
Damn never in my timeline today I could’ve predicted that Elon would quote tweet @tradexyz @HyperliquidX to 100$ today
Few people realise what’s happening in bio tech and it’s breakthrough.
Check out bio/acc or follow @m_goes_distance to get an infra of the flow state in pharma/bio happening right now at the wet labs.
Anthropic at 25-30x current run-rate looks expensive on the surface but the reality is different here’s why:
On the compute side: previous market repricing (spot GPU/cloud prices moving, contract resets) is real and already priced into these deals. Anthropic’s edge is they contracted ahead of the curve, improved inference efficiency fast, and turned a fixed cost base into a scaling advantage. If utilization stays high, the math works the leverage is exponential.
Compute costs already collapsed from 251% of revenue → 48% in ~12 months revenue per compute dollar from $0.40 to $2+. They’re locking in massive multi year capacity now via take or pay and minimum spend contracts with the hyperscalers and others.
As that capacity gets utilized and revenue scales toward the $190-200B 2028 numbers they’re underwriting, the multiple compresses hard while the absolute valuation can still climb which is a Classic leverage.
At last all you need to be right before keeping your funds is to regularly calculate intelligence per watt ,intelligence per $ and how the previous compute contracts are gonna reprice.
$ANT
BREAKING: Anthropic officially files its S-1 registration statement for an IPO, seeking to list on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol $ANT.
FULL SUMMARY OF ANTHROPIC'S S-1 FILING:
1. Anthropic posted H1 2026 revenue of $16.3 billion with a net loss of $80.7 billion
2. Anthropic says it does not expect to pay a dividend "in the foreseeable future"
3. Expects to spend up to $120.5 billion on SpaceXAI and Nvidia compute
4. Expects to spend up to $114.5 billion with Google through 2033
5. Revenue growth rate "may not be sustainable" and "may decrease"
6. May be required to seek additional financing "sooner than expected"
7. 5% of Anthropic's shares will go to the "Anthropic Public Benefit Fund"
8. S-1 includes warnings of AI's "catastrophic existential risks to humanity"
Markets currently expect Anthropic to raise as much as $100 billion at a valuation of ~$2 trillion.
The company is reportedly targeting an IPO in the week of November 16th.
If you think of it in a way @TxFlow_L1 has took a different route and made the barrier to liquidity a whole lot easier for their traders while they used a portion of Hyperliquid API.
Team said that API is 3% which makes it the pure compatibility layer so every bot, MM, and tool already built for HL can point at txflow with almost zero rewrite this drops the barrier to liquidity to near zero.
core is 80%. consensus + matching engine built in-house from scratch. HL’s is closed source anyway so there was nothing to fork.
Time to be bullish ig!!!
DYOR NFA!!!
Seen a few posts claiming TXFlow is a Hyperliquid fork. Here’s exactly what we did and didn’t do:
Bridge(10%): Yes. We use Hyperliquid’s bridge contract. It’s held billions in user funds and has been battle-tested in production for years. We weren’t going to re-invent custody code when a proven contract already exists.
API(3%): Yes, by design. Our API mirrors Hyperliquid’s so builders already integrated there can plug into TXFlow with minimal changes. That’s a compatibility decision, not a copy of their system.
Core(80%): No. Hyperliquid’s consensus and matching engine are closed-source. There is nothing to fork. Our consensus layer and trading engine are built in-house from the ground up.
Happy to go deeper on any of this.
“XTEN will TENX and reach TEN Dollars in 2027”
What a coincidence:
@extendedapp ticker is $XTEN
Pre-market price and polymarket odds are currently near $250M which gives an approx $1 per point
TENX(10x) from here is $2.5B with $TEN dollars again.
will comeback to this
“XTEN will TENX and reach TEN Dollars in 2027”
Looks like universe made this framing happen 😅🤫
@derteil00 and panda land accepts it.
A new IQ test ANONS!!!
CT is so pissed that S0 of @TxFlow_L1 rewarded much more than they expected for early alpha users and spreading fud .
Don’t forget when CT is pissed on vlad during lighter high volumes before TGE.
Don’t forget CT trashing variational before points season calling it with high spreads.
The best time to farm it is now whether it succeeds or fails the loss is going to be the most minimal of all time.
Make your choices with this info.
Everyone who leaves @TxFlow_L1 will comeback at the end of q1 when they realise the following updates:
The validators currently being trusted will migrate to trustless just like hyperliquid did near to TGE.
The bridge gets closed and they issue native USDC as they mentioned in the docs I’m fine even if they don’t.
The same thing happened with variational with slippages during inception.
Those who keep farming in the first few months will win at least that’s my view.
TxFlowがHyperliquidのナラティブを踏襲していることは彼ら自身最初から明言しており、そのうえで良い部分を取り入れるのはごく当たり前の話。
引用元にもあるように、ブリッジとAPIを流用してるのは本人たちも公言してるし、セキュリティ的にむしろ妥当。そしてその互換性はweb3の良さそのもの。
またHyperliquidのコアはオープンソースじゃないのでフォークしようがないし、そもそもL1からPerpまでまるごと作るってのはAMM DEXのようにフォークでどうにかなるレベルの話ではない。
TxFlowを触ればUXの良さは一目瞭然だし、プロダクトの完成度の高さやマーケの上手さはCEXの知見があるからこそだとも思う。
中央集権的だという指摘も、TxFlow自身が現在は「trustlessではなくtrusted operator」だと認めてる。
最終的にはUSDCをネイティブ発行してブリッジ自体をなくす構想だと、以前の記事にも書いてる。
また初期にバリデータが分散してないのはTxFlowに限った話じゃない。なんならHyperliquidも2024年まで、ブリッジは4バリデータの3/4マルチシグだったはず。
TxFlowが成功するかどうかは別として、中途半端な理解で批判を引用して知ったかしてる人たちには正直モヤっとする。
俺は応援してるよ。
anon_x🕯️ retweeted
Seen a few posts claiming TXFlow is a Hyperliquid fork. Here’s exactly what we did and didn’t do:
Bridge(10%): Yes. We use Hyperliquid’s bridge contract. It’s held billions in user funds and has been battle-tested in production for years. We weren’t going to re-invent custody code when a proven contract already exists.
API(3%): Yes, by design. Our API mirrors Hyperliquid’s so builders already integrated there can plug into TXFlow with minimal changes. That’s a compatibility decision, not a copy of their system.
Core(80%): No. Hyperliquid’s consensus and matching engine are closed-source. There is nothing to fork. Our consensus layer and trading engine are built in-house from the ground up.
Happy to go deeper on any of this.
For everyone that feels @TxFlow_L1 is just a @HyperliquidX fork here’s the answer.
The team has responded quickly and it’s pretty legit to show what exactly happened.
Anyone would’ve used the battle-tested best metrics for some of the features if they are meant to be more composability for the builders .
TBH this is slightly bullish in my view.
This tweet is all I need to keep farming @TxFlow_L1 .
Seen a few posts claiming TXFlow is a Hyperliquid fork. Here’s exactly what we did and didn’t do:
Bridge(10%): Yes. We use Hyperliquid’s bridge contract. It’s held billions in user funds and has been battle-tested in production for years. We weren’t going to re-invent custody code when a proven contract already exists.
API(3%): Yes, by design. Our API mirrors Hyperliquid’s so builders already integrated there can plug into TXFlow with minimal changes. That’s a compatibility decision, not a copy of their system.
Core(80%): No. Hyperliquid’s consensus and matching engine are closed-source. There is nothing to fork. Our consensus layer and trading engine are built in-house from the ground up.
Happy to go deeper on any of this.
Time to get a free @ProprXYZ account ANONS!!!
Possibly upto a $200k challenge account
My capsule #10191 on @DRAWUPxyz was empty. 84 in 100 are, refills 00:00 UTC.
34 pulls left today, 4 prizes in them.
pull on my link: your capsule is 2x likelier to hold a prize.
0.5% hold a $200,000 account. every rate onchain.
drawup.xyz/c/bosxnw
The second worst decision @Quantzilla34 might take after heavily farming hotstuff,grvt and @extendedapp is to sell at TGE before getting EU license.
Anyways he is one of the great quants I look upto and I hope he succeeds well .
Damn this is pretty sleek
The IDE era is dead.
Introducing Reason, the AI Teammate for work and code
We made Reason manage customers, build itself and also make this video.
Pareto-frontier on Terminal Bench 4.0 and DeepSWE
Now you can try it for free -> reasonmachines.com