Geopolitics, Military, Security. Applied tech. Accept yourself. Veteran. Opinions are my own. #TruthMatters #FactsMatter Not Legal Advice!
Texas
Joined April 2012
- Tweets44.7K
- Following2.2K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes11.6K
Pinned Tweet
First Article is up. Please give it a read, a like if it deserves it (I hope it does), and share it.
So because I spoke the truth about choosing the lesser of two evils, and called Trump an actual Democrat, which he always was and still is imo, just an old moderate version thereof, apparently I lost followers.
People have forgotten the difference between actual conservatives and those chosen out of a very poor set of choices.
The US has a horrible habit of choosing the worst among us to lead us, as the best run away from politics mostly.
This election was just a part of a long litany of poor choices the masses make, with zero logic involved.
We elected a loud mouth, self serving idiocrat larping as a conservative. Is he all the left accuse him of? No. Is he some wonderful, hyper intelligent human? Please stop with the bad jokes. Trump is a TV WWE Announcer President with the ego to match and it’s why we lost as a party. His mouth caused more problems than he ever solved, which was arguably quite a few. He did do some good, he just destroyed that good with his never ending word vomit.
Was he better than Biden? No question. Is he the best of us? Not even remotely.
Hopefully people have learned. Hopefully republicans choose someone who is in fact intelligent and can get the masses together. A natural leader with extreme intelligence and talent. I will never again vote for a guy with an average iq 40 points below mine. I don’t care if people don’t like that. Meh.
Does Vance have the basic abilities to do that? Maybe? Will he get a chance? Probably not bc conservatives are to busy looking for the next TV star like personality instead of an actual leader potential candidate. I have no problem replacing Vance, but it should be someone with unimpeachable tact, personal life and demonstrated integrity above all.
We have many in fact. There is a former astronaut, doctor and Navy seal in particular out there. A guy with zero skeletons, and a whole lot of talent. We need a guy like that… someone neither democrats nor republicans can argue against. Why are we not seeking out people like that?
If anyone disagrees with my take, stop reading Mullah propaganda and learn how they actually got to power...
How did "socialists" and the "left" bring this about? Read on... because it's exactly what is happening here at home right now, they are not doing it directly, just setting the stage to destroy us from within:
Soviet Union and China spent decades funding, training, and directing the Marxist opposition that SAVAK was built by the west and the Shah to destroy.
That effort helped create the conditions for the 1979 collapse of the Shah.
After 1953, the USSR heavily subsidized the Tudeh Party, ran clandestine radio from Baku, and supported underground networks. After the Sino-Soviet split, China backed more radical Maoist splinter groups with asymmetric warfare theory and direct support.
SAVAK’s response was systematic overreach. Because the Soviet/Chinese threat was real, it treated almost all dissent as subversion. Moderate liberals, students, and secular democrats were crushed alongside actual Marxist cells.
The result was a classic trap:
The regime’s brutality became the story.
Western support for the Shah was delegitimized inside Iran.
SAVAK stayed focused on the left and underweighted Khomeini’s mosque networks.
By 1979 the organized secular and democratic opposition had been largely dismantled or discredited. The Islamists stepped into the vacuum.
External communist sponsorship didn’t install the Islamic Republic, but it helped force the security state into a posture that cleared the field for it. The Mullahs used it and then later slaughtered the left "democratic" (socialist actually) movement that helped get them there, turning their backs on, and eventually killing the ones that helped them obtain power and oust the Shah.
No matter what side you are on:
If you vote for Islamist, you either hate women, freedom and everything this country ever stood for, or you are just naive to the point of stupid.
There is no middle ground on this. To be clear Democrats:
They hate you. They hate everything the left believes in or claims to believe.
By voting for them you are choosing evil out of spite over a guy who will be gone in 2 years... and politics you disagree with, from republicans who have no intention of harm, by supporting Islamists who believe slaughtering you and your families is justified, which is really, really dumb.
It's the same way the Mullahs took over Iran... by using the popular left... and then once they won, the slaughtered them into submission. Don't believe me... study history.
So, if you want to live in an oppressive, regressive, hate based society... vote for them, if not, stop voting for the enemy within.
No matter what side you are on:
If you vote for Islamist, you either hate women, freedom and everything this country ever stood for, or you are just naive to the point of stupid.
There is no middle ground on this. To be clear Democrats:
They hate you. They hate everything the left believes in or claims to believe.
By voting for them you are choosing evil out of spite over a guy who will be gone in 2 years... and politics you disagree with, from republicans who have no intention of harm, by supporting Islamists who believe slaughtering you and your families is justified, which is really, really dumb.
It's the same way the Mullahs took over Iran... by using the popular left... and then once they won, the slaughtered them into submission. Don't believe me... study history.
So, if you want to live in an oppressive, regressive, hate based society... vote for them, if not, stop voting for the enemy within.
Grok Bot is amazing... I have been using it for a few weeks now and it just keeps improving. This actually makes AI useful in a real sense.
Try it for free for 2 weeks with this invite:
grok.com/refer/bot?code=8QVM…
Thought of the day:
What is crystalline to one mind manifests as a cryptic memoir to another, obscured by disparate faculties of social discernment and a failure to comprehend the shared choreography of human queuing, whether by conscious volition or fatalistic design.
Further:
While unvarnished veracity is desirable, it must be tempered by a modicum of civil decency.
Should we fail this fundamental test of mutual recognition, we risk dissolving altogether into the unyielding, eternal void of alienation.
The Inversion of Sovereignty: A demand for the Reclamation of Natural Right
Our legislators have branded the citizen; the courts have justified their malign contempt for our breath. What began with the heralds of the court in Marbury v. Madison has culminated in a system where unelected arbiters back the demigods ruling over man in congressional robes, sustained entirely by the raw application of executive force. In their pride, these institutions have taken it upon themselves to decide what legislated words be valid, and to what extreme extent the servitude and compliance of the masses may be demanded by their own fruiticious phrasing—constructs upon which they place arbitrary value, yet enforce with concrete violence.
The social contract that was, is now incrementally inverted by those explicitly meant to guard its core tenets. Government, conceived as a servant to secure the inherent liberties of the living individual, has transformed into an insulated ruling class. It treats the populace not as the sovereign source of authority, but as mere subjects whose primary obligation is absolute compliance to bureaucratic overgrowth. We are all but no more, lest we return to what was, and undo what has been. This is a mutinous work, requiring the direct response of the citizen, lest the Constitution be entirely usurped and all liberties lost forever.
Part I: The Judiciary—The Heralds of Judicial Tyranny
The judiciary, designed to be the weakest branch, has elevated itself to an absolute oligarchy by the magic of its own self-granted definitions. Under the fiction established in Marbury, the Supreme Court became a temple of self-anointed heralds, claiming a monopoly over what is true and what is lawful. When the courts severed their ties to natural law, language itself became a weapon to strip away human dignity and codify systemic malice.
Look upon their historical fruits to see the limits of their law. In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the heralds of the court looked upon a living man, a soul seeking freedom, and used their fruiticious legalism to declare that entire generations of human beings were mere property, devoid of citizenship or standing in the eyes of the state. In Buck v. Bell, the same institutional arrogance flowed from the bench, declaring that "three generations of imbeciles are enough," thereby justifying the bodily mutilation and forced sterilization of the vulnerable under the guise of public welfare.
In the modern era, this judicial tyranny manifests as a protective fortress for the state's enforcement arms. Through the invented doctrine of Qualified Immunity—a shield woven entirely from the judiciary’s own words without a single shred of constitutional baseline—the courts have guaranteed that the executive force can trample the citizen, violate the home, and extinguish breath with near-total impunity. Where the courts claim the supreme right to define the boundaries of human existence, they prove that they acknowledge no higher law than their own preservation.
Part II: The Legislature—The Demigods in Congressional Robes
The legislature, structured to be the voice of a free people, has instead become an assembly of demigods in congressional robes. They operate within a closed, insulated ruling class, treating the wealth, the labor, and the daily movements of the citizen as property to be mined, cataloged, and managed through an endless torrent of complex statutes.
To expand their dominion, these demigods have twisted the plain language of the Constitution into a blank check for absolute control. Through the corruption of the Commerce Clause, exemplified in Wickard v. Filburn, the legislature claimed that a citizen growing wheat on his own private land, purely to feed his own livestock, was committing a federal offense. By their logic, if an individual’s self-reliance can be construed to affect a national market, then no action, no private thought, and no independent livelihood falls outside the jurisdiction of the state.
Worse still, they have structured the law to consume the material fruits of the citizen’s labor directly. Through the mechanism of Civil Asset Forfeiture, the legislature has authorized a system of legalized plunder. Under these provisions, the state targets the property itself, allowing the executive force to seize cash, vehicles, and land from citizens who have never been charged with, let alone convicted of, any crime. The burden is then cast upon the citizen to prove their own innocence to buy back what was already theirs. This is not governance; it is an economic siege dressed in statutory robes.
Part III: The Executive—The Sword of Compliance
A decree without an enforcement arm is mere ink; it is the executive branch that serves as the raw, unvarnished sword of compliance. While the legislature spins its webs and the judiciary rationalizes the snare, the executive deploys an alphabet soup of administrative agencies—the FBI, the ATF, the IRS, and an unaccountable regulatory bureaucracy—to demand absolute submission through the threat of violence.
These administrative agencies operate as a shadow government, issuing mandates that carry the full weight of criminal penalties without ever passing through a representative vote. They change definitions overnight, turning law-abiding citizens into felons by the stroke of a bureaucrat’s pen. This vast administrative apparatus exists primarily to enforce compliance with the state's demands, ensuring that the "fruiticious words" of the ruling apparatus bear down upon the individual with heavy, concrete reality.
History stands as an unyielding witness to what happens when a citizen chooses peaceful non-compliance against this monolithic force. From the historical flashpoints where communities were burned and dissenters were crushed beneath tactical boots, to the routine, quiet violence of modern tax and regulatory raids, the state’s final argument is always the application of physical dominance.
When the executive branch prioritizes the enforcement of arbitrary mandates over the protection of natural rights, it ceases to act as a constitutional guardian and becomes an occupying army.
Part IV: The Reclamation—Undoing What Has Been
We stand at the precipice of total subjugation, bound by a complex matrix of legal fictions that have completely inverted the social contract. The guards have abandoned their posts to become our masters. If we continue to passively accept their definitions, if we continue to yield our breath to their arbitrary limits, we seal our own doom and the doom of every generation to follow.
We are all but no more, lest we return to what was, and undo what has been. When those who hold institutional power abandon the moral boundaries of natural law, they dissolve the very contract that grants them an ounce of legitimacy. They possess no true law over us; they possess only force. To break this cycle, the illusion of their absolute authority must be shattered by the collective will of the sovereign populace.
This is the hour of response. We must join together as a unified people to defeat those who seek to usurp, distort, and destroy our foundational Constitution. We must refuse compliance with mandates that violate inherent rights, reject the arbitrary decrees of unelected arbiters, and strip away the layers of bureaucratic tyranny that have grown over our republic.
True authority does not reside in the text of administrative codes, nor does it belong to the demigods in congressional robes. It belongs to the people. Reclaim your sovereignty, undo the inversion, and defend the Constitution, lest all be lost.
New media. Launch 30 October.
Sound, reasoned, and objective writing on veterans’ law, VA policy, and the courts—sourced to the records, built for professionals and the public.
First article includes input from credible, well known professionals in the veteran law and claims spaces.
Judge it for yourself.
Four to five pieces a month on topics that matter.
#IntentToFile #VeteransLaw #VAPolicy #PublicDiscourse
Intent To File Media is a new source for clear, primary-record-based writing on veterans’ law, VA policy, and the courts, with related coverage in law, education, and military topics.
Built for veterans, legal professionals, advocates, and anyone else who needs accurate information instead of summaries that drift.
The goal is straightforward: explainers and articles that stay close to the statutes, regulations, decisions, and records, written so both specialists and the general public can follow them.
Informational only, not legal advice.
First piece drops Friday evening next week.
It examines how AI tools are entering the VA claims environment, what the governing rules and available records actually show, and where the practical boundaries sit.
Friday evening, 30 October.
#IntentToFile #VeteransLaw #VAPolicy #ITFMedia
BREAKING NEWS:
Texas GOP candidate Brandon Herrera (@TheAKGuy) used hair gel and probably listened to Dire Straights once.
3 year old mini me: "Papa, look, I brushed my teeth, no more food in my teeth... and I wiped the boogers too."
Me: "That's good son... but my sleeve is not a tissue..."
Toddler and dad issues... 🤷♂️
