Bitget delisted solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u because DOG wouldn't pay to play. My conviction hasn’t changed. Maybe this even strengthens the case for what DOG is building. Of course we want more exchanges. Exchange count matters for practical liquidity, retail access, and price discovery. But we also want the RIGHT exchanges. Ones that understand a decentralized, community-driven memecoin on Bitcoin. Exchanges like @krakenfx . DOG wasn’t built around VC allocations or a paid KOL cabal. Its identity is rooted in distribution, community, and Bitcoin. If an exchange requires money to list it, that exchange simply isn’t a fit. solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u is changing the inudstry in this regard. As an exchange, you don't interview solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u army and extract money. solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u army interviews you. Does losing a trading venue help liquidity? No. But one exchange’s decision doesn’t erase the thesis. My thought is that as Bitcoin grows, so does the opportunity for a native memecoin with a community that refuses to disappear. That’s why DOG remains one of my highest-conviction altcoins. In a sector flooded with paid promotion and liquidity extraction, proving a memecoin can grow without buying its way into everything matters. DOG is challenging the pay-to-play model itself. Quality attracts quality. Let the tourists leave. Keep building.