Collasso 2.0

trovo assurdo che ogni cazzo di volta che provo a fare amicizia con un tipo questo mi tratta come l'ennesimo pezzo di carne da voler scopare, poi se faccio la scontrosa mi danno della frustrata

To all the Jew haters: Name ONE bad thing a Jew has personally done to you. I’ll wait.

One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!" And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent. It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential. Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn. In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier. So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight? This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way. If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them. And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form. This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing. This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead. Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want. The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both. And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately. Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do. In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time." In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do". Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill. We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again. What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense. Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.

La proprietà privata al massimo può essere una concessione laddove non contrasta con l’interesse collettivo.

Oui, c’est vrai. En 1965, Daniel Burros, Grand Dragon du KKK de New York et ancien secrétaire national du parti nazi américain, a été exposé par le New York Times comme juif (bar-mitsva, parents juifs). Il s’est suicidé le jour même de la publication.

Il mio professore a fine lezione "non sacrificate la vostra carriera per un uomo, dite ai vostri fidanzati: "bello stai con una dottoressa" " Buon proseguimento di giornata

Yo @grok Jared Kushner’s father hired a prostitute to seduce his own brother-in-law, secretly filmed it, and mailed the tape to his sister as blackmail. After serving time as a convicted felon, he was pardoned by Trump and now serves as the U.S. Ambassador to France Is this true? Yes or no. No spin.

GOOD MORNING DEMOCRACY