Max Winga (@maxwinga) header
Max Winga (@maxwinga) profile picture

Creator Outreach & Systems Lead working to prevent AI extinction risk @ControlAI Previously - AI safety researcher @ConjectureAI, UIUC Physics DMs open!

Joined May 2024
Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)Photo by Max Winga (@maxwinga)
With all the attention on creator partnerships going on, we figured it was a great time to explain our work with creators at ControlAI, and how we're informing millions about extinction risk from superintelligent AI! We cover how the creator industry works, how we choose who to work with, how we structure partnerships, and our side of the engagement with Sabine Hossenfelder. blog.controlai.org/p/control…
1
7
1
34
3,341
Max Winga retweeted
Over 125 lawmakers across the UK and Canada are now publicly calling for an international ban on runaway machine intelligence. As new evidence emerges that it could arrive sooner than expected, momentum is building to change course. Thread 🧵
4
20
2
154
1,916
🧵The lawyers here really held @DarioAmodei's feet to the fire and it's interesting to see how he squirmed under oath about AI extinction risk. Under penalty of perjury he's reaffirmed his belief that AI is the greatest threat humanity has ever faced.
Dario Amodei testified under oath that he didn't know his home address
16
28
5
214
20,772
And further we can clearly see the weird twisted logic Anthropic attempts that somehow despite the fact they're making some of the most powerful and dangerous AIs, none of the risk comes from them and they're actually reducing it (while pushing the race as fast as possible)
2
2
1
37
2,297
I'm really looking forward to seeing more testimony of these CEOs under oath in the future. Seems like holding them to old quotes they wrote is best, they're generally more truthful in writing than when you ask open ended questions. What specific questions would you ask?
16
1,331
It is pretty rich of you to cite "others could go faster" as a reason to redact so much important information when you yourself do not appear to be slowing down much at all. Nor are you throwing yourself behind efforts to pace the frontier with nearly the gusto that you would if it was your top priority. Not to mention "commercial sensitivity" you yourself have said human extinction is a plausible outcome why are you even talking about commercial factors (well, I guess honesty is good, and since it IS apparently a factor in your decision...) To all my friends at Anthropic: Your company appears to be recklessly gambling with our lives. You fancy yourselves the more responsible alternative to OpenAI (as they fancied themselves compared to Google) but judging by actions rather than words the similarities between the three of you seem stronger than the differences.
36
120
10
1,418
67,700
Max Winga retweeted
This report and reactions from people I trust (like Jake) are making me physically ill. As far as I can tell, Anthropic's central plan is to continue this acceleration of AI capabilities until we're getting decades of AI capabilities growth in a year. Given our very limited ability to understand or control AI systems, this would be extremely reckless and completely unacceptable, and it should be the single top priority of civil society and the US government to stop them and other companies from doing this.
7
17
1
147
4,760
Max Winga retweeted
This is not what it looks like when there's just one or two more alignment issues to fix before it's okay to begin a recursive self-improvement loop. This is the sort of emergent surprise that signals that you have no idea what's going on in there, and that it's time to back off.
🧵 Astra covertly underperforms on safety research tasks. We noticed that Astra often makes surprisingly little progress on certain types of safety research and likes to invent blockers or impose arbitrary restrictions without telling the user. In most of these cases the decision to underperform was not verbalized in the CoT meaning our misalignment monitoring system did not detect this. To measure underperformance we created a paired open-ended coding evaluation with safety and capability tasks. On this eval Astra scored 10% when we framed coding tasks as safety research, vs. 16% when framed as capabilities research. The gap remained after we excluded trajectories with refusals or verbalized intent to underperform in CoT. There was no such gap for 5.6-sol. When we aggressively filter out trajectories with even brief expressions of ethical doubt in the CoT the performance gap seems to reduce.
23
110
6
919
22,728
Seems very concerning, AIs might intentionally underperform at safety research. So much for iterative alignment, who could've possibly seen this coming... Nobody should be allowed to build runaway machine intelligences that we have no way to understand or control.
🧵 Astra covertly underperforms on safety research tasks. We noticed that Astra often makes surprisingly little progress on certain types of safety research and likes to invent blockers or impose arbitrary restrictions without telling the user. In most of these cases the decision to underperform was not verbalized in the CoT meaning our misalignment monitoring system did not detect this. To measure underperformance we created a paired open-ended coding evaluation with safety and capability tasks. On this eval Astra scored 10% when we framed coding tasks as safety research, vs. 16% when framed as capabilities research. The gap remained after we excluded trajectories with refusals or verbalized intent to underperform in CoT. There was no such gap for 5.6-sol. When we aggressively filter out trajectories with even brief expressions of ethical doubt in the CoT the performance gap seems to reduce.
5
13
328
Max Winga retweeted
This is really bad and people should be freaking out about it. We're probably all literally going to die in the coming years. We shouldn't just accept that and move on.
We at AIFP are spooked by this information. IF (big IF) Anthropic really is imminently about to meet the RSP threshold of 2x acceleration over baseline, then it seems timelines to full RSI and superintelligence may be very short indeed. For example if we naively optimize the AIFM parameters to achieve 2x acceleration over baseline progress in Jan 2027, we get superintelligence sooner than depicted in AI 2027. We are thinking harder and longer about this now and will hopefully have a lengthier update on our thinking to share in the next week.
46
36
5
419
79,156
The cyber stuff is baked in at this point. A lot of damage will be done. But it's not too late to stop the bio and the RSI pieces. The way to stop is to halt frontier AI development. This will be hugely costly. But the cost of continuing will be greater. That much isn't obvious just yet. It will be over the next year or so.
8
25
1
206
27,906
There's a decent chance the internet ceases to exist as such, at least for a time. AI-enabled bioweapons are also coming, and there's no "shut down the websites" option for that. We're approaching the point where frontier AI R&D becomes politically untenable.
Vulnerabilities in a programming language that supports much of the internet are so severe that European and British authorities recommend websites temporarily go offline until they can be fixed. nbcnews.com/tech/security/cr…
75
201
54
1,446
347,767
Worth reading and sharing with friends and family outside this space. We must ban the development of superintelligent AI or this is only the tip of the iceberg for how bad things are doing to get.
# Black October For anyone who knows me even somewhat well, it's clear that I am a 99th percentile tech optimist. However, the vibes have shifted for me quite a bit in the last 18 hours, and I feel a moral imperative to share what I'm thinking and feeling with my circles so that everyone can understand, and hopefully take seriously, what's happening right now. I think October 2026 will have many chapters written about it in the history books. You know those scenes in financial movies like Margin Call where someone realizes that they're all fucked, and no one else sees it yet? And that person feels like they're crazy, and then suddenly everyone is pulling an all-nighter in a boardroom and freaking out? Yeah, that's kind of how this is feeling right now in the SF/Bay Area/AI circles. We're 48 hours into what is being called Black October. In the last 2 days there have been several dozen cyber attacks which, in isolation, would each have been the worst to happen in an entire calendar year. Every sector from government to education to big tech and banks is being massively affected, and people are starting to freak out. In a nutshell, what's happened is that frontier AI models have gotten to a point where they are as advanced as the most sophisticated programmers, with one critical difference: they can work 24/7, and you can spin up 10,000 of them with a single command and they'll work together tirelessly until they accomplish their task. The most advanced models today are from companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, whose current best technology is so good that they haven't been able to roll it out to everyone yet because of the national security risks it poses. Meanwhile, the best open source models (where anyone can just download the model weights and do whatever they want with them, uncensored) are slightly behind the frontier but still 90-95% as capable. These models, developed primarily in China, are being used by black hat hackers to wreak havoc on the Western capitalist structure. Presumably, this has been part of China's plan the entire time, and we're seeing its implications fall out in real time. In red-pilled AI circles, we've been sharing and reading papers called things like "Situational Awareness" and "AI 2027" for the last year or so, which at the time felt a bit like near-term speculative fiction. They laid out the case for why Artificial General Intelligence (AI smarter than any human at any knowledge task) and Recursive Self-Improvement (models that are able to use themselves to get better) weren't half-baked future ideas anymore, but instead an inevitable outcome of the linear progress that's happening. These papers would then talk about things like "takeoff scenarios," trying to envision how that moment would come to be and what it would be like when it happened. It would either be a "slow takeoff" that would play out over the course of months and quarters, happening subtly and only obvious to a few. Or, it would be a "fast takeoff" where it would pretty much happen instantly, like a bit flipping from 0 to 1. From everything that I can see and am feeling, we are currently experiencing the fast takeoff scenario. Beyond the crazy security vulnerabilities that have come out recently, there have also been massive breakthroughs in life sciences, fundamental computer science, materials science, and pure mathematics that have all landed in the same time frame. While I still firmly believe that AI will be a net positive for humanity, it's more clear to me than ever that the societal and individual risk is very real, and is playing out NOW. For as much conviction as I have that this is happening, the thing that's caused me to lose sleep is that I don't really know what to do about it, or more importantly, what to tell you, reader, to do about it. So, the best I can do is make a few suggestions that have always been a good idea but are more timely now than ever: Set up 2-factor authentication for everything. I use Duo. Use a password manager across your devices. I use 1Password. Get an identity protection app set up. I use Alta. Move your IoT devices to their own network. Claude helped me do this. And last, but certainly not least, if you've been avoiding leaning into AI, see this as a catalyst to wake up and start using it. Don't just use the chat mode version of ChatGPT/Claude; click that Code/Work button and see how easily you can have AI write code to help you with your job. One of the biggest vulnerabilities was in a massively popular programming language called PHP, and the prompt that set it off was literally, "Find vulnerabilities in php." This is an unprecedented time for humanity, but as we've done with many things before, we will prevail so long as we are kind, loving, and open-minded to the world. Much love.
194
I'm using the critical PHP vulnerability as an opportunity to issue my periodic reminder that AI is not only becoming more capable in offensive cyber capabilities but also in offensive bioscience capabilities. It's way easier to patch software than humans.
2
4
1
38
1,181
Max Winga retweeted
And the problem is that current third party auditors are those who took this proverbial deal with the devil. This means we should trust them much less, even if audits became mandatory and no longer voluntary.
People worry a lot about third-party auditors being biased because of where they get funding or who their employees are friends with. IMO by far the biggest source of bias is that if they upset an AI company, that company will stop letting them audit. When I was at METR this dynamic was a way bigger effect than everything else combined. Of course no auditor can avoid this until audits are no longer voluntary.
1
8
406
Max Winga retweeted
Thanks! We've applied. Can't fit all the wins in 280 characters, forgive me :) We actually have over 200 lawmakers on board between the UK (180) AND Canada (38) campaigns as a result of over 400 direct briefings with lawmakers themselves in the US, UK, Canada, and Germany (+ just started EU-focused outreach this week). We've also met with over 250 congressional offices. Our bill to UK ban ASI was the first such bill to be introduced anywhere in the world in September. We also consulted on the second ever bill (Sanders-Casar). You may notice similarities between their bill and our discussion draft we published: drafts.controlai.org/asi-ban… We've also been involved with killswitch legislation in the US and UK (not a solution to x-risk though). On top of creator partnerships getting millions of views. Connor Leahy has gotten 10M+ views across podcast appearances in the last few months, and our media team has helped get over 125 tier 1 and 2 articles covering AI extinction risk / ban ASI in the last year. Everything we have is built and proven to scale across countries. We're entirely bottlenecked by funding and good talent. When we started everyone said this was impossible. You can't talk to lawmakers about this issue. Banning ASI is impossible. We've proved them wrong. All it requires is laser focus on banning ASI (it's the only thing we care about) and a relentless drive to iterate, optimize, and scale bigger.
2
10
187
Lots of people saying this might be live warfare - seems unlikely to me (ping and technical complexity) but at minimum this is to help train drone pilots and I expect primarily serves to harvest lots of training data to train autonomous AI pilots.
Ukrainian-developed FPV drone simulator “Remote Reaper: FPV Drone” has officially left Early Access, with version 1.0 now available on Steam. Developed in collaboration with military pilots, the simulator focuses on combat FPV drone operations and introduces several features in its full release, including armored vehicles with modeled vulnerable zones, electronic warfare effects that can disrupt video feeds and control signals during the final stage of an attack, and a customizable drone editor. Version 1.0 also adds configurable weather conditions, custom mission editing, real-time flights with other pilots and a racing mode. Players can use FPV hardware or a gamepad with realistic flight physics, or opt for simplified controls using a keyboard and mouse. #RemoteReaper #FPV #FPVDrone #DroneSimulator
9
506
Max Winga retweeted
🗣️ 'We are kind of running out of time.' CEO of ControlAI, Andrea Miotti, issues a stark warning about artificial intelligence, telling @cathynewman that 'more needs to happen' in government to implement safety measures quicker than it is currently moving.
16
32
4
120
50,866