Louisiana courts do not recognize contempt by vibes. A couple of relevant cases. First, in Short v. Short, the First Circuit reversed contempt findings because, although the challenged conduct frustrated the opposing party and arguably violated other legal duties, the injunction did not expressly prohibit it. Contempt requires willful disobedience of a direct court order; courts strictly construe that requirement rather than expanding an injunction by implication. 418 So. 3d 938, 951–52 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2025). The orders here prohibit the NCAA from enforcing specified NCAA eligibility rules. They do not order the NCAA to prevent independent conferences from enforcing their own rules. Without evidence that the NCAA directed the SEC to act as its proxy, the SEC’s conduct may generate a new lawsuit--but it does not place the NCAA in contempt. Louisiana’s Supreme Court has even reversed contempt findings against school officials who actually refused to follow a TRO concerning a student. Dauphine v. Carencro High School, 843 So. 2d 1096, 1109 (La. 2003). So the claim that an entirely separate entity’s conduct automatically places the NCAA “in contempt of multiple court orders” is advocacy (or as I said earlier, bullshit), not a serious statement of Louisiana contempt law.