Pinned Tweet
The liberal consensus is cohered around an outdated paradigm of anti-racism, anti-fascism. It doesn't know how to deal with intolerance, religious fundamentalism and sectarianism which are the real challenges to societal cohesion today. We're in a spiral with a clueless elite.
‘We’ve Seen This Movie’: Four Writers on What’s Next for Israel nytimes.com/2026/10/29/opini…
I'd call this gaslighting.
NHS invites white staff to take £250 ‘disrupt racism’ course
telegraph.co.uk/gift/e74f506…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
'And thus runs the year in yesterdays many,
And winter wends again, as the world asks...
Then thinks Gawain all too soon
Of his troubling journey.
Yet until All Hallows' Day with Arthur he lingers...'
Hallowtide and the dark half of the year: aclerkofoxford.blogspot.com/…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
For Halloween, an essay about doubt and belief, that may, or may not be, an Irish ghost story: unherd.com/2026/10/a-hallowe…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
Fred Lyon #photography
Seagull over Golden Gate Bridge, c1950s
Michael Hallihane retweeted
By me: Any requirement to have digital identification to use social media represents a major infringement on our civil liberties and a massive encroachment of the state’s power.
telegraph.co.uk/gift/f510e2c…
'What the King should really tell Commonwealth leaders'
Tony Sewell
thetimes.com/article/775124a…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
A prestigious liberal outlet breaks cover to acknowledge the disparities of migrant sex offences, but asks us to see it in perspective. In perspective to what, though? My column for @TheCriticMag
thecritic.co.uk/can-the-econ…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
‘This is the appeal of Burnhamism. It’s a warm bath. A comforting but fleeting indulgence. The commentariat and Labour’s bourgeois base seem desperate to pretend it is still, basically, 1997’
My @spikedonline column
Michael Hallihane retweeted
Apparently, being cited by someone on the ‘hard right’ is now enough to make you guilty by association.
That is the Guardian’s case against me. It has published an article about my opposition to the Church of England’s £100 million slavery reparations scheme, smearing me through supposed links with Restore Britain and associating our campaign with wealthy financiers.
Yet its evidence of my ‘hard right’ connections amounts to a Restore Britain paper citing my work. As for Paul Marshall, he has never funded our campaign.
What about my arguments against reparations? What opposing reasons and evidence did the Guardian offer? None whatsoever.
Read my response to the Guardian at The Biggar Picture: nigelbiggar.co.uk/p/my-answe…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
Pretty grim stuff from an estate in South London where a housing association sold the homes to a property management company which is now attempting to push through evictions and convert the houses to HMOs
All the bottled water at Ocado is out of stock. I wasn't prepping. I don't see the point. But just looking to place my regular order. If we had a real crisis rather than an imaginary one we'd be screwed. Although the two overlap now. A lot of the scaremongering over Covid was
Michael Hallihane retweeted
Analysis: For pro-Israel diaspora, Israel’s Arab voters are a point of pride. For Israeli Jews, they’re a national security threat timesofisrael.com/for-pro-is… via @timesofisrael
Michael Hallihane retweeted
The fact that this merits comment suggests just how censorious & stifling the policing of online expression has become. It WAS Think Before You Post & You Can't Say That. Now it's Think Before You Like & You Can't Like That.
🚨 NEW: Nigel Farage says Reform candidates will not be banned for liking Tommy Robinson posts.
• Nigel Farage has said candidates for Reform UK will not be prevented from standing if they like social media posts by Tommy Robinson.
• Speaking on Radio 4’s Today programme, the Reform leader said: “I wouldn’t ban anybody for liking someone like Tommy Robinson. Wouldn’t be my cup of tea, but I wouldn’t ban anybody from doing so.”
• He added that he does not want the party to get into a world of cancel culture, though he would act if someone supported something outright wrong.
• Farage said any response would depend on the specific post. “I’m not going to run a party where we say ‘you can’t talk about that person or that person.’ We have to be sensible about vetting, and we are.”
• Farage claimed the party vets its council candidates to a much higher level than any other political party.
Michael Hallihane retweeted
Jonathan says 67 seats against Netanyahu in a Knesset of 120 is a landslide, and that the reason nobody treats it as one goes back to the founding of the state: Arab parties did not sit in government, a taboo built on mutual suspicion rather than prejudice alone.
Michael Hallihane retweeted
*EXCLUSIVE*
Andy Burnham is facing growing Labour anger over Brexit, with a minister warning him against “reopening old wounds” on Europe
telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
Michael Hallihane retweeted
Everything that Burnham/Healey say screams early election. This is likely as good as it gets for the Government on the economy, still lots of spending cuts to be done in unprotected departments, big fiscal drag effect still to come, and Burnham wants a proper mandate
On balance I come down on the same side of the line as Simon, but maybe for a slightly different reason.
I don't think it is practical to deliver the sort of radical changes needed at this budget both for external reasons (current external shock on headroom) & internal reasons (this government simply hasn't had time to develop sufficiently credible & detailed policies, rushing would do more harm than good on balance).
I think the real test comes in following months on: 10 year strategy, welfare reform, spending review. These three together do need to signify a more radical approach to solving the major structural challenges facing the UK economy.

























