@mintfolio_ robinhood:0xbd9fceaf34ce6fccf225cc17a17bf868924b2480 - I had Claude analyze your contract with a simple question: "Did the DEV rug the token". Here is the answer, word for word, from Claude : Short answer: yes, the dev wallet sold, but it didn’t start the biggest crash. The dev’s tokens went out in a separate, earlier dump. The big crash came from a wave of unrelated sellers. I pulled every MINTFOLIO transfer since launch, 50,767 of them, straight from Robinhood Chain’s official RPC. The explorers kept looping on the Cloudflare check. 1. The dev dump: Oct 8, about 4am to 3pm your time The deployer wallet 0xcEE7…cb72 got 10M tokens in its launch buy on Sep 30. About 3.5 hours after launch it got another 10M from 0x7958…d316. That wallet was filled by two other wallets that bought right at launch. On Oct 8 the deployer sent all 20M, which is 2% of supply, to 0x9c35…05b0 in two transfers about 30 minutes apart. 0x9c35 then sold the entire 20M into the Uniswap pools in 13 sells over about 11 hours. The biggest single sell was 4.85M. It isn’t a random wallet. It bought about 24M at launch, sold about 30.3M (everything it acquired) during the first week, then dumped the dev’s 20M. Its ETH balance is now basically zero. In total, the deployer plus this linked wallet sold about 50M tokens (around 5% of supply). The deployer handing its whole bag to another wallet right before a dump is a classic way to hide dev selling. 2. The big crash: Oct 12, about 1pm to 5pm your time About 858M tokens were sold into the pools in that window, against about 487M bought. That’s roughly 370M net dumped, more than a third of supply. The selling was spread across many wallets. The largest sellers each dumped about 10M to 28M:0xbe89…93b6 sold 28M 0x26d1…dd09 sold 25.5M 0x40d9…0179 sold 22M 0x0312…4980 sold a net 21.9M 0x7970…748c sold 62M but had bought 43.5M in the same window, so it was flipping Several sellers start with 0x4337, which suggests smart wallets from one app, so a few of those may be one person. None of these sellers received tokens from the deployer, from 0x9c35, or from the deployer’s original funder. The dev wallets held zero tokens by then. The price then partly recovered on Oct 13 with heavy buying. Caveats The links above are traced through token transfers only. I couldn’t trace ETH funding paths, so a seller funded secretly with ETH by the devs wouldn’t show up. “0x9c35 is a dev wallet” is a strong inference from the onchain record, not proof of identity. The posts that shared this contract as a 10x call also matter. Dev linked wallets selling about 5% of supply into that hype is a red flag on its own, even though the Oct 12 crash was a broader exit. Sources: NodeFlare: Robinhood Chain RPC endpoints QuickNode: Robinhood Chain RPC providers

Think in trillions.

If your clients are asking about crypto but don’t know where to start, our Active Crypto ETF is the solution they need. With $TKNZ, investors can get broad token exposure in a hassle-free way. . . Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risk factors and other information included in the prospectus.

We’re exploring a Stock Token linked to an actively managed ETF on Robinhood Chain, alongside @TRowePrice_DA, one of the world’s largest asset managers with $1.9T AUM. If successful, it would be the first Stock Token of its kind. Institutions are here, and our rails are ready.