Pinned Tweet
1/ Somethingās off with the CT claims.
Weāre seeing the same wallets pull hundreds of claims not a few, hundreds.
One address alone has 687 claims.
Another has 497.
Another 437.
This doesnāt look like normal community claiming.
@ConcreteXYZ
@ConcreteXYZ @crypttoji @nic_builds
MIZZY retweeted
šØ ALERT šØ
i am suing @p0rchy for defamation.
lawyers: my DMs are open. sloth-friendly firms preferred, i pay in bananas and vengeance.
let me be very clear: i have never promised a gift and not sent it. never. over a thousand gifts went out in the last four days and every single one i told someone about landed on their rewards page.
porchy read one dumb complaint from a guy trying to con a sloth, panicked, and called me a "black box" in front of the whole timeline. my image is ruined. my mum saw it.
he's going to answer for this. see you in court porchy š¦„āļø
Guys we are aware @HousebetsHubie is promising bonuses and sometimes not actually crediting them.
We are unsure if itās a bug or heās just fucking with the users. We genuinely donāt have any oversight itās a black box what he does.
Looking into this asap.
1/Found something ugly in the @ConcreteXYZ ecosystem.
Not the airdrop this time.
The vault deposits.
Mapped DeFi USDT vault funding trees.
One pattern keeps repeating:
Same funders ā dozens / hundreds of deposit wallets.
4/@ConcreteXYZ
If most ādepositorsā are funded from the same hubs,
how much of this TVL is real independent demand?
Video of the connection tree below.
Data doesnāt lie.
If this research was useful
like, retweet, and dig the wallets yourself.
Tag the team. Donāt let it stay buried.
@ConcreteXYZ
On-chain is public.
Pressure should be too.
More coming.
MIZZY retweeted
This is what $CT claim clusters look like on-chain.
Not random users.
Not organic distribution.
Clear multi-wallet structures feeding into the same nodes.
Built this to map it.
@ConcreteXYZ
Still not added funding connection for all š
š
@nic_builds @GustavoRSSilva @crypttoji
1/ Somethingās off with the CT claims.
Weāre seeing the same wallets pull hundreds of claims not a few, hundreds.
One address alone has 687 claims.
Another has 497.
Another 437.
This doesnāt look like normal community claiming.
@ConcreteXYZ
@ConcreteXYZ @crypttoji @nic_builds
This is what $CT claim clusters look like on-chain.
Not random users.
Not organic distribution.
Clear multi-wallet structures feeding into the same nodes.
Built this to map it.
@ConcreteXYZ
Still not added funding connection for all š
š
@nic_builds @GustavoRSSilva @crypttoji
1/ Somethingās off with the CT claims.
Weāre seeing the same wallets pull hundreds of claims not a few, hundreds.
One address alone has 687 claims.
Another has 497.
Another 437.
This doesnāt look like normal community claiming.
@ConcreteXYZ
@ConcreteXYZ @crypttoji @nic_builds
MIZZY retweeted
1/I got shocking data from the Concrete $CT airdrop.
One wallet claimed 1,325,053 CT.
Another took 890,177 CT.
A third took 321,416 CT.
Just the top 10 single claims ā 2.87 million CT.
@ConcreteXYZ still silent. Receipts š
@nic_builds @GustavoRSSilva @d3crypt0r25
1/I got shocking data from the Concrete $CT airdrop.
One wallet claimed 1,325,053 CT.
Another took 890,177 CT.
A third took 321,416 CT.
Just the top 10 single claims ā 2.87 million CT.
@ConcreteXYZ still silent. Receipts š
@nic_builds @GustavoRSSilva @d3crypt0r25
4/
7. 0x57b8e0b4efc55dc51f30b711481883d97396dcf1 22,824.75 CT
etherscan.io/address/0x57b8eā¦
0x3cd8ad7a06104cf1d689360bf4ce06f5360772e5 18,238.06 CT
etherscan.io/address/0x3cd8aā¦
0x4aaee20543e118a5f86d626ed5b98e37b9835ebf 18,000.03 CT
etherscan.io/address/0x4aaeeā¦
0xf9d21a614b024daa99231f0aee43e49a3da23219 12,395.24 CT
etherscan.io/address/0xf9d21ā¦
5/All single claims.
Huge allocations. No clear public criteria.
@ConcreteXYZ
Explain this or the list keeps growing.
Xpass might be cooking something interesting
One subscription
X Premium
Grok
Cursor
Grok Bot
and more
If the leaked Xpass plans are real this could actually be a pretty crazy bundle for builders
Still waiting for the official confirmation though
MIZZY retweeted
1/ Somethingās off with the CT claims.
Weāre seeing the same wallets pull hundreds of claims not a few, hundreds.
One address alone has 687 claims.
Another has 497.
Another 437.
This doesnāt look like normal community claiming.
@ConcreteXYZ
@ConcreteXYZ @crypttoji @nic_builds
Honest questions:
1. Were Access / Moai role requirements actually enforced in the final eligibility list?
2. Is there any plan to review or address these multi-claim clusters?
3. Will the community get a clear explanation on how eligibility was filtered?
9/ If youāre a real user who actually farmed properly drop a like / RT.
This isnāt about hate. Itās about fairness.
Role system was strict for a reason.
Sybil farms shouldnāt walk away with the allocation meant for real users.
Help push this so @ConcreteXYZ actually sees it









