Pinned Tweet
I do not have any paid service or any intention to have one.
I DO NOT have any paid,
a. website,
b. discord channel
c. whatsApp Group
d. Telegram
e. Any other
Please do not get scammed.
$CLS :
Checks on FCF, EPS Growth and PEG is 0.21
Why PEG?
A P/E on its own can’t tell a cheap stock from a slow-growing one. A 15x P/E is expensive for a company growing earnings 5% a year and cheap for one growing 70%.
PEG divides the P/E by the growth rate, which turns the question into “what am I paying per point of earnings growth?”
It’s the earnings-side twin of Adj, which does the same thing with EV/Sales and revenue growth.
The usual benchmark is 1.0, from Peter Lynch’s rule of thumb that a fairly priced company’s P/E roughly equals its growth rate:
- Below 1: you’re paying less than one turn of P/E per point of growth, conventionally “cheap for its growth.”
- Around 1: fairly priced on that heuristic.
- Above 1: paying up. For context, mega-cap quality names often trade at 1.5–2.5+ on consensus.
This is exactly the winning formula: lose small to win big
Here's My Survival Blueprint:
Keep My risk tight:
Focus on tight pivots and defined spots so my mistakes are always cheap.
Trim into vertical strength:
Let the market pay for my trades early, turning stress into house money.
Never hold blind overnight risk:
No cushion / No hold
Protect myself from macro gap-downs and keep my cash flexible.
When I consistently cut losers fast and let my funded runners go, my downside is locked down leaving the door wide open for that one big asymmetric mover to change my month.
The reason for this question is that I invested in $NTSK. Refer to the attached X Post
xitter.cf/mmonis/status/20071791…
After investing, it fell by more than 50%. I held
The fundamentals and growth were intact after 10 months, 40% above my buy price






















