Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs) profile picture

Professor of Economics at Stanford GSB

Stanford, CA
Joined May 2009
Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)Photo by Michael Ostrovsky (@mostrovs)
You should ask for a refund from the university that awarded you your “math degree”
i have a math degree and still don't know which is surjective and which is injective. please stop using those words. they hurt my wee brain
23
4
4
640
26,979
My suburban Bay Area neighborhood is not walkable - but at least it is now waymable!
5
1,213
My op-ed with Frank Yang on congestion pricing in New York City is now in the Milken Review. Tolls on Uber/Lyft/taxi trips and on commercial vehicles and deliveries should be much higher - and then the toll on personal vehicles does not need to go up in 2028 and 2031. Link below.
2
6
930
Now out as an @nberpubs working paper. Carpooling (broadly understood) and congestion pricing go hand-in-hand, especially as self-driving technology has finally arrived. Without them, we risk the roads becoming one giant and slow-moving parking lot.
Increased traffic congestion can destroy all efficiency gains from self-driving cars. Carpooling and congestion pricing are highly complementary in solving this problem, from @mostrovs and Michael Schwarz nber.org/papers/w34261
3
947
I can't believe they didn't include the Dish in the photo, it's the iconic touch. Other than that, hard to disagree.
2
2
788
Aside from Waymo and Apollo Go (Baidu), are there any companies that are providing a (i) truly driverless (no safety driver) and (ii) publicly available (no waitlist, etc.) commercial car service over a (iii) reasonable geographical area (not just a couple of pre-set routes)?
1
3
695
More details in the current version of the paper at the link below.
What would NYC’s traffic congestion pricing really mean? As part of the Insights & Bites lunch series, students joined Professor @mostrovs for a thought-provoking discussion on his research into the economics behind this timely and controversial policy.
2
2
1,020
Well, Romania stepped up to the plate (and Vatican just a few days earlier)
At a talk by @JMilei at Stanford. He is discussing price equilibrium in general and Brouwer’s and Kakutani’s theorems in particular. I look forward to the discussion of fixed-point theorems at the upcoming @JoeBiden - @realDonaldTrump debate.
2
5
644
1. "Traffic moved faster through most major bridges and tunnels" 2. "Traffic improved along some streets within the congestion zone, but remained snarled in other areas like the length of West 42nd Street and Ninth Avenue between West 60th and 14th Streets."
One week after congestion pricing's debut in New York City, bus riders are experiencing faster rides and drivers are sitting in less gridlock at bridges and tunnels. The latest on New York's traffic experiment, with @WinnHu and @collinskeith nytimes.com/2025/01/13/nyreg…
3
1,138
One would normally want to wait longer to evaluate the effects of major policy changes, but the results of the first three days of Congestion Pricing in New York City are so striking that it is already possible to make some (at least preliminary) conclusions. (A 🧵)
69
140
32
1,647
751,712
This suggests a straightforward fix: charge more to taxis and FHVs (during peak times). In the paper, we work out the specific numbers, and also discuss the related issue of delivery services. We propose the same $9 toll per FHV/taxi trip, or even better, $4.50 per mile.
12
4
2
205
51,126
Having said all this, the current plan is an amazing first step in the right direction - congratulations to all the policymakers for the incredible work they put into making this happen! It's great that it is already working so well on the bridges and tunnels!
13
5
369
44,601