Twitch streamer. Voice actor? Writer??? Still fringe. [email protected] Bluer Skies: https://xitter.cf/t.co/YvWGfhkmA1 https://xitter.cf/t.co/LSZDuZLryw
Joined April 2011
- Tweets8.1K
- Following666
- Followers25.1K
- Likes3.9K
I ultimately settled on the old adage, "do no harm, but take no shit," told them off and moved on, because it's not my job to teach people manners. Still, it made me realize just how awful we can be to each other without even trying.
Imagine an arcade with around 300 people. Most are at their favorite cabs playing with friends or randoms, and the rest are listening to the most deranged nonsense from someone named CherryNutz in the center of the room, who's somehow always there when you are.
Good times.
Adding on to this, I think the most crucial aspect of the movement in the classic games is how it works in tandem with the other systems.
Learning how to counter every attack or dodge every room is the end point of dozens of hours of practice, and 99% don't care that much.
Movement is often your riskiest tool, and using it nets you the biggest resource save/gain. Combat is often your safest, at the cost of bullets you might need later. Failing at either of them (or choosing to take damage) means less heals for later. Risk, reward, all deliberate.
This is observably false.
People complain about both when presented with the information. Hobbyists are just louder about it. Developers of all sizes have been going to great lengths to obfuscate AI use generally, so much so that Steam now has an AI usage disclosure requirement.
AAA devs that are bold enough to openly lean into AI usage don't really have that problem, as their markets extend well beyond the microcosms of people mad in Youtube comments, private Discords, or Twitter. There was outrage at the new Tomb Raider(s?) using AI, for instance, but
S. retweeted
youtube.com/shorts/AkPczc3R_…
Announcement short
And so the Sony Paystation was born.
