Análisis de Estrategias. Por una cultura de la Inteligencia al servicio ciudadano. *Inteligencia es anticipación, todo lo demás es Información*

Homo Aragonensis
Joined March 2023
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
Como le Fiscalice la compra de estos vehículos, uno que yo me se, seguro que encuentra una comisión o desvío a una cuenta en Gibraltar @notasintel @Luisautonomo @EUAntiFraud @EU_Finance @Europol
El área de Medio Ambiente presenta cinco nuevos vehículos que vienen a mejorar y ampliar la flota destinada a la limpieza viaria . El Gobierno de la Ciudad ha invertido cerca de 9 millones de euros en sesenta de esos vehículos desde que comenzara la legislatura.
2
6
241
Replying to @notasintel
“España debe adaptar su agricultura al nuevo marco agrario, en que los aportes de excelencia de exportación y consumo combinen con las ecoenergías. No somos tierra de vino, sino de dianas y aciertos.” Pedro Sánchez. “La comarca Tierra del Vino solicita traducción.” Dip.Zamora.
2
2
120
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
La inflación, ese combustible para los disturbios sociales @notasintel
1/10 Cada vez que se bloquea un estrecho a miles de kilómetros, sube la factura del abono en nuestros pueblos. Esta semana hemos arrancado un piloto de biofábrica colectiva en la Llanada Alavesa. Os cuento qué es y por qué ahora 🧵
1
2
242
#NotasDeInteligencia Parafraseando a Keynes: *Los políticos que se creen libres de toda influencia intelectual, son generalmente esclavos de algún geógrafo difunto* Mackinder: Europa y Rusia deben mantenerse divididas [Ideales democráticos y realidad] amp.dw.com/es/friedrich-merz…
2
7
28
725
#NotasDeInteligencia Los sobreentendidos sobre el contexto son causa de problemas, afortunadamente evitables A veces es mejor hacer más preguntas aunque parezcas tonto, que hacer sólo una y sufrir las consecuencias Método Colombo
The two most famous lines, does your dog bite, and, that is not my dog.😆
2
3
14
514
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
The ugly truth about France and some of the other European countries currently in turmoil - and which none of the politicians want to admit because it'd be political suicide - is that you can't solve the problem by going after immigrants (as the right asserts) or the rich (as the left asserts), but you could solve it by going after the old. One extraordinary statistic for you: people over 60 in France, a quarter of the population, own 60% of France's wealth, non-financial and financial (ofce.fr/pdf/revue/2025/3-192…). And here is another crazy statistic: that same quarter of the population, those above 60, receive nearly two-thirds of all social spending by the French government (previssima.fr/actualite/prot…) - which is famously among the highest in the world (France's government spending is an insane 57.3% of GDP). Last statistic: they make up about 40% of voters because they're a third of registered voters (insee.fr/fr/statistiques/266…), and they turn out far more than anyone else (franceinfo.fr/elections/sond…). Put our 3 statistics together and there's almost a bit of an apartheid situation here: the old own most of the country's wealth, collect most of the social spending and have the political power to keep it that way. Which makes them a de-facto rentier class, living off assets and transfers paid for by younger generations. And, of course, at the risk of stating a truism, the future is built by the young. Yet France keeps effectively taking money away from them to give it to those whose working lives are already behind them - and need the money far less since they already own the country's wealth. What about inheritance, I hear you ask? That's the funniest/saddest aspect: given that life expectancy has kept rising, the French now inherit a home at 54 on average. The most common case is someone in their 80s leaving it to heirs in their 50s, in effect the very old transferring wealth to the about-to-be old (insee.fr/fr/statistiques/fic…). You can add this to our earlier apartheid statement: on top of all the rest, even when the old finally let go of their wealth, it stays within their own "camp". That's my personal situation, incidentally: I'm 42, my father is 71 and he is starting to look at ways to pass things on to me and my siblings, when our professional lives are already well settled, so it'll arrive when it changes things the least, which is pretty much the French system in a nutshell. Now, I get that there'd be some unfairness in going after them: they paid into the system their entire working lives, playing by the rules of a social contract that told them if they paid up they'd collect at the end. Changing the rules now means breaking that promise, which is admittedly unfair. But there's no magic wealth tree in any society: you can only take it where it is. That's the way most major societal transformations end up happening. They're often triggered by a catastrophic event (the so-called "four horsemen": mass-mobilisation war, revolution, state collapse, plague) BUT what really drives change is a transfer: wealth gets pried from the privileged class who've been sitting on it and handed to those who'll build what comes next. So, in theory and in an ideal world, you can do without the catastrophic event and directly proceed with the transfer... The fact that in France, and elsewhere in Europe, it's the youth protesting is probably no coincidence - even though they don't frame it as a generational fight. And even though, cruel irony, the left politicians many of them march behind promise to bring the retirement age back to 60 (lcp.fr/actualites/legislativ…), which would make the situation even worse. Let's say they understand intuitively that the system is stacked against them, even if they haven't yet figured out how. And politicians are obviously doing what politicians do, meaning pandering to the people who actually vote, while pointing the young towards easier - and politically convenient - scapegoats. To be clear I'm not saying it's the only problem in France, VERY far from it. I'm also not saying that all old people in France live a lavish lifestyle at the expense of younger generations: there are also plenty of very poor retirees who, if anything, would deserve more. What I am saying is that it's probably the biggest elephant in the room: everyone can see it, nobody dares mention it - no politician, from any side, wants to run on cutting grandma's pension - and it makes every other problem harder to fix.
900
1,965
391
11,130
1,508,289
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
El HILO. Mis respetos,@HartmutUrrutia
🧵1. Índice hilo Opus político. 1. El Opus como agente de poder encubierto geopolítico. Sus alianzas 🇮🇱ClA. Le CercIe, 0rden de MaIta, 6 👁️ Nacionalcristianismo totalitario. Bibliografía: Clermont, Teacher, Williams, Ganser. ¿El Opus creador de partidos políticos en España?
2
17
1
52
3,788
Cuando la escucho me derrito 🤤
I hope you find a few peaceful moments with family and friends this weekend. And if life feels overwhelming, take 10 minutes for yourself and let this piece of music bring you some peace. 🎶
3
3
20
733
Bach y sus hermosos bucles extraños
Listen to Hilary Hahn perform Bach’s Baroque music and discover the purity and exquisite order that still exist in a world full of turmoil.
1
3
12
430
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
Replying to @Ivan24325830
Desestabilizar para estabilizar. Caos predeterminado y orden ad hoc. Confesión del antiguo Ministro del Interior italiano, Cossiga, ya fallecido, activo en la década de 1970. Fue el artífice de la "estrategia de la tensión" y, antes de morir, reconoció :
2
6
2
20
2,331
La gestión del miedo y la escasez by @Cyandeceres Esto me recuerda a la Doctrina Tarkin 😉
open.substack.com/pub/browns… Aquí comparto con todos vosotros mi último artículo para Brownstone: "El gobierno del miedo y la psicología de la escasez". El miedo es una reacción instintiva que nos puede salvar la vida llegado el caso. Sin embargo, el miedo inducido, usado como herramienta de control de masas, es el método favorito de las élites gobernantes para lograr que los individuos tomen decisiones contra sus propios intereses. La manipulación del miedo y la gestión de la psicología de la escasez constituyen la vía más rápida para la implantación del tecnototalitarismo. Espero que resulte de vuestro interés.
1
5
360
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
En resumen, que me he liado: la IA nunca podrá tomar decisiones que el ser humano no le haya permitido tomar.
1
1
2
188
La angloesfera y la geografía no casan bien
In 2002, British commandos roared up a Spanish beach in their amphibious landing craft and leapt ashore brandishing assault rifles and mortars. Bemused Spaniards in the town of La Linea de la Concepcion watched as 45 Commando unit began deploying 'tactically' in the sand. 1/3
4
4
19
952
Excelente y bien explicado 👍
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
17
1
38
2,153
Lo de Francia explicado gráficamente
2
3
1
18
883
Thank you, Boris
ROTHSCHILDS FINALLY TAKE OVER UKRAINE Ukraine's Ministry of Finance has officially signed agreements with the international financial group Rothschild & Co, which will handle preparations for the privatization of Ukrgasbank and Sense Bank. Together with the company FinPoint, the Western financiers will conduct an asset valuation and organize the sale of state-owned share packages to foreign investors. Kiev justifies this process with statements about "reducing the state's share" and "the need to attract foreign investment." Soon all that will remain of the "sovereign state" is the flag and the trident, while all real property will be finally transferred to Western jurisdiction. YOU FIGHT THEY GET RICH #Ukraine #Rothschild #banks #news #newsupdate #newsupdates
1
5
14
442
Las manifestaciones pacíficas no venden titulares en los mass media
Images impressionnantes de la manifestation à Paris. #24octobre #24octobre2026 #Paris #France
6
10
26
627
Notas de Inteligencia retweeted
If I were sitting in Washington watching the AI bubble begin to deflate while the consequences of restrictive monetary policy and a prolonged energy shock pushed an already deteriorating economy toward financial crisis, I would recognize just how convenient a major cybersecurity emergency could become. Suddenly, market crashes, banking disruptions and economic contraction have an external culprit, giving policymakers justification for extraordinary intervention while diverting attention from the financial imbalances and policy decisions that preceded it. That is what makes the timing of PHP2Shell so interesting. Whether these vulnerabilities lead to widespread disruption or simply generate enough fear to dominate the headlines, the narrative is already taking shape. A highly publicized cybersecurity emergency could provide political cover for an economic collapse already unfolding. Sometimes the event blamed for breaking the system is simply what exposes a system that was already breaking.
1
1
111