Pinned Tweet
📣 Today's press release recaps highlights from 2024, which include more than doubling our customer base and tripling ARR!
Thank you to our customers, investors, partners, and friends who have provided invaluable feedback and support along the way. 🙏🏻
bit.ly/40umBu6
Only 30 to 40% of SaaS and AI apps ever get a formal TPRM review. The ones that do are assessed once, then left alone.
Adaptive risk management adjusts controls as risk changes, not when the next review comes due.
bit.ly/3VJBjxo
OAuth grant numbers worth sitting with: 88 per employee, 31 with data-level access, ~45 min to review each manually.
Do that math at scale. Manual review was never going to keep pace.
bit.ly/4zwm21y
You approved an app in March. By June, someone invited contractors, uploaded sensitive data, and connected an AI agent with one click.
Same vendor. Very different risk.
Here's a breakdown of how Adaptive Risk Management keeps up: bit.ly/4dTqYFx
Gartner: half of all SaaS breaches will trace to overprivileged OAuth tokens by 2027.
You can’t review a grant you don’t know exists. Dormant grants and stale integrations don’t show up in logs.
Wrote about it for @BleepinComputer
bit.ly/4i6OYat
"If a SaaS app gets breached, that's the vendor's problem."
Nudge's Danielle Russell on Security Unfiltered: it never worked that way.
In reality, security built programs for the 10 apps it knew about and still owned the other 90.
Full episode here: bit.ly/4B6kkWr
Manual review of one high-risk OAuth grant: 45 minutes. Verdict: revoke.
Same grant through our new AI agent: 15 seconds. Same verdict.
Average employee has 88 OAuth grants. 31 touch data. Nobody is reviewing those by hand.
This will help ➡️ bit.ly/4yCwVPu
TPRM didn't break because of AI. It was already broken.
We assessed vendors, never usage. We screened on scores that measured their marketing site, not your data. We triaged and hoped.
The score is about them. Your exposure is about what you gave them.
bit.ly/3U7KKGr
Most vendor reviews are accurate for exactly one day.
After that: new OAuth grants, teams, AI features, & agents. Nothing triggers a second look.
Adaptive Risk Management in Nudge Security re-scores risk as it changes & tells you what to fix first.
bit.ly/4rOpNNg
Three questions before connecting any AI tool: what can it see, what can it do, who owns it?
Good framing. The catch: those questions get answered on a consent screen, by one person, right before they click Allow. Not in a review.
bit.ly/4dVq9Mb
Your team approved that SaaS app 6 months ago. Since then: new integrations, new users, an AI agent, and data nobody signed off on.
Risk doesn't stop at approval. Most programs stop watching right there.
Today, we're launching Adaptive Risk Management: bit.ly/4xQNzJK
Today, Nudge Security is introducing Nudge AI Agents that take crushing, repetitive work off your team's plate — OAuth grant reviews, browser extension triage, vendor risk analysis.
Agents assemble!
Learn more here: nudgesecurity.com/post/were-…
🎉 We're thrilled to announce our $22.5M Series A funding led by Cerberus Ventures, with participation from Ballistic Ventures, Forgepoint Capital, and Squadra Ventures.
Many thanks to our customers, investors, and supporters. Stay tuned!
bit.ly/49kOTvY
As the adoption curve for GenAI continues to bend skyward, the risk of a cascading, AI-fueled cyberattack is becoming a more immediate threat.
This OpEd in @theinformation by @russellspitler explores this risk (subscription required):
bit.ly/4igmnh3
#ai #ciso #infosec
You know that feeling when you find $20 in a pair of jeans you haven't worn in awhile? We can help you find SaaS spend you didn't know about, forgot about, or is no longer needed, helping you eliminate wasted spend and fund new investments.
bit.ly/40L9qWk
#cfo #cio
LastPass has reported a malicious actor adding fake reviews on the Chrome Web Store and directing customers to call a number controlled by the actor.
Additionally, we have found reviews targeting users of other Chrome extensions.
bit.ly/48yYhtu
#infosec #iam




