🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars) header
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars) profile picture

🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱)

@opreturnwars

OP•RETURN•LOL | SWAP ON BITCOIN L1 | Builder On @wbtclol @universal_fdn

 Genesis
whitenode.co/marketplace/LOL
Joined May 2023
  • Tweets4.8K
  • Following134
  • Followers5.4K
298Media
Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)Photo by 🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) (@opreturnwars)
Buy more $(🌱) first programmable asset on Bitcoin 💊 crc.garden/market
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0vSep 22
This tweet was ignored. Then CRC-20 happened. Narrative follows execution.
1
5
1
12
3,430
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) retweeted
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picture
laz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v3h
People said you need OP_CAT or OP_CTV for stateful contracts on Bitcoin. We compiled 27 contracts to pure BIP-342 Tapscript under P_NUMS. Bitcoin Core v31.1.0 accepts them. The rest is client-side ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Image from laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v)
3
5
19
859
You see this @star_okx
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
4
190
You see this @natbrunell
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
106
You see this @w_s_bitcoin
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
4
163
You see this @OrangeSurfBTC
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
64
You see this @ShizzyUnchained
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
134
You see this @0xCobra_
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
2
131
You see this @glxyresearch
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
79
You see this @intangiblecoins
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
2
111
You see this @Excellion
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
69
You see this @Jiurn
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
2
174
You see this @notsofast
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
134
You see this @TFTC21
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
120
You see this @_weidai
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
84
You see this teapaw.org/laz1m0v/status/2115886… @giacomozucco
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
67
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) retweeted
Punkreturn (🌱) (@punkreturn_) profile picture
Punkreturn (🌱)@punkreturn_4h
Replying to @Truthcoin
@Truthcoin you see this teapaw.org/laz1m0v/status/2115886…
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
1
55
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) retweeted
Punkreturn (🌱) (@punkreturn_) profile picture
Punkreturn (🌱)@punkreturn_4h
Replying to @cbspears
@cbspears teapaw.org/laz1m0v/status/2115886…
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
1
49
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) retweeted
Punkreturn (🌱) (@punkreturn_) profile picture
Punkreturn (🌱)@punkreturn_4h
Replying to @jimmysong
@jimmysong teapaw.org/laz1m0v/status/2115886…
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
2
49
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) retweeted
Punkreturn (🌱) (@punkreturn_) profile picture
Punkreturn (🌱)@punkreturn_4h
Replying to @CG_BRC20
@CG_BRC20 teapaw.org/laz1m0v/status/2115886…
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
2
4
60
🧙🏿‍♂️ OP•RETURN• (🌱) retweeted
Punkreturn (🌱) (@punkreturn_) profile picture
Punkreturn (🌱)@punkreturn_4h
Replying to @TheBlockRunner
@TheBlockRunner teapaw.org/laz1m0v/status/2115886…
laz1m0v (🌱) (@laz1m0v) profile picturelaz1m0v (🌱)
@laz1m0v4h
Bitcoin can’t multiply. Or can it? 👀 I built a way to multiply two numbers directly in Bitcoin transactions — with zero changes to Bitcoin. 371 bytes. No soft fork. No OP_CAT. Formally verified and tested on Bitcoin Core. How it works delvingbitcoin.org/t/multipl…

Multiplication in Tapscript today: 371 bytes, no soft fork

OP_MUL has been disabled since 2010. Under BIP-342, any product has to be built from OP_ADD and shifts, and every intermediate that is later consumed by another arithmetic opcode must still fit in a...

delvingbitcoin.org
1
4
61
Load more