Dr. Harris, if you're nasty retweeted
If AI isn't going to give us all more leisure time and a better standard of living then we don't need it. AI isn't trying to solve human toil and labor. It's trying to solve the problem of paying wages.
Dr. Harris, if you're nasty retweeted
It’s “unkempt”, not “unkept”
It’s “piqued” your interest, not “peaked” your interest
It’s “a part of” or “apart from”, not “apart of”
It’s “to each his own”, not “to each is own”
It’s “moot” point, not “mute” point
Dr. Harris, if you're nasty retweeted
I hate everything going on right now and WHAT’S WORSE is that stupidest ppl you know are very happy
It’s my birthday!! 🥳
35 feels like the age I was always meant to be, and I’m so glad I’m finally here!
1
58
Love to reboot “hate the sin, love the sinner” rhetoric to disguise transphobia 🙄
Also, don’t ramble on about not redefining words when your whole post redefines what “woke” has always meant just to suit your bigotry.
To me, “woke” is indicative of any ideology that sacrifices logic, reason, rational thought, wisdom, knowledge, history, and facts on the altar of socio-political agendas. For example, when we as a society start to rationalize the idea that biological sex is somehow a subjective cultural construct, and not a scientific fact, we are doing ourselves a great injustice. The inability for many people to define what a woman is means that we are collectively losing our grasp on reality.
We cannot start redefining words and their meanings simply to make a small portion of the population feel more validated in their subjective experience. We can, and should, love them and want the very best for their lives. They should have the freedom to live their adult lives however they see fit, so long as it’s not infringing on the rights of others. But that should never include turning our backs on objective truth to do so. We can both love and support them, AND hold firm to what we know is fact. These concepts are not mutually exclusive. 🙏
1
116
You cannot win an argument against the stupid or deliberately obtuse and I don’t know why so many people try
1
70
Why did this radio host say that Quincy Jones’s cause of death was “not disclosed” like it’s a mystery. All due respect, and some offense, the man was 91. What’re you not getting??
102
A real “genius” would’ve come up with a better strategy for drumming up subscribers to their failing podcast than posting ableist slurs and ragebait.















