The worrying times for the world of AI, as well as the reliance on inference as primary driving force, are going to abruptly come to an end soon enough.
And the age of formal industrial revolution at its dawn, and our abundance with it.
May this gift be well received!
80
I think time has come to put these in proper context... Or maybe next months, we'll see...
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
114
Almost without exception, when the concept of capitalism is referenced, its semantic value is that of crony capitalism - which is to say the systemic corruption on top or beneath it, corruption whose source is outside of it, and which find its ways in any system.
And yes, we mostly live in it. The best understanding of market dynamics, and of capital, is that of no system.
Yes, there must be sub-systems which can sustain it, like the rule of law.
Anyway, I find that almost without exception, people project their lived experience on the concept itself…
And while at it, the concept itself is insufficient, it is fallible, and much must be created over its best current form, even if purely theoretical, let alone its current instantiation.
70
If you can see a serious contribution in any techne, and you expect it to actually work as you envision it, be ready to write your own kernel.
If you’re lucky, a semantic model layer will suffice.
You’re probably not that lucky though…
And is not limited to the Computing world - it is true in anything…
PS: and don’t forget to thank the Giants before you who made your problem possible.
Neither to forfeit your responsibilities towards them , and cower away, in silent shame to half-measures after you’ve tried that so many times already, and know that it never works…
May your contribution be never known by anyone but thyself, and be sufficient as such!
58
I wish I would have published the Phroence manifesto a year ago, since apparently there isn’t much to add to it…
63
There isn't any serious risk inherent to "AI". There are risks obviously entailed by throwing probabilistic calculus into the fabric of all layers of society, industry, processes, etc.
This is, at the end of day, a human foible by choosing to take the responsability of LOGICAL probability...
There are lots of reasons for which probabilistic calculus will run the show for a while, but inevitable, it will take its second place, since it cannot - by definition - sustain complex product production in a stable way.
60
Its time for Episteme Studio to bring the Ionian tradition - and especially its latest gifts - to the modern marketplace.
It’s time for Europe to play on its strengths again, after the 20th century’s historical brain drain.
Episteme shall serve that mainly on European soil, with a focus on European talent development, and talent leveraging, or equally to be a lever for the existing talent.
In terms of its technical backbone - in the true sense of techne - Europe is still the premier giant, is just that it has been a silent, dormant, and mostly caged the giant, or ousted it.
And yes, with absolute no apology - but with bitter disappointment - its entity will have to be based “in the new world”, because Europe lacks the legal, structural and financial instruments required for Episteme.
I hope that shall be fixed in my lifetime, and that we can serve and be part of that solution as well in any way shape or form.
Now let it be noted… Europe’s latent intellect shall enter the markets.
May we make our ancestors proud, may we carry the torch of our tradition and apply it for an accelerated betterment of mankind, and of our people.
1
55
As predicted… the stupid Hegelian left (in all of its collectivist, end-of history forms) has managed to push things to such an extent into alien territory so foreign to Enlightenment structure… Those structures didn’t have antibodies for what happened - especially - in the last three decades, as what happened was obviously downstream of the undeveloped structures themselves which left the opening.
24
When naked, down to its core, any organizational structure can be approximately defined by its capability stack — fully irrespective of products, processes, teleological objects, or even higher-level abstractions.
The question is important because, at the end of the day, it is your bounded function: applied over any topos, it algebraically defines your capability envelope — with (obviously) infinite combinatorial compositions.
So… what is your capability stack?
21
Rome's legacy and Ionia's legacy are being reborn as one, as their best souls hoped for. Per infinita aspera ad veritatem!
As he once said; ἀνερρίφθω κύβος!
22
A man can start to understand himself only when he realizes that he IS his ancestors. That he is the vessel of their bottled up energies, hopes or wisdom.
But this starting point will afford proper expansion only when one has identified the proper, implicit teleological substrate of him as a vessel.
Each man must find that for himself, so all i have to say on what that might be, is this;
One is his past, but one is not his future. And right there, in that anthitesis, the core teleological objects lie. One must do with them what one can, and ideally… More!
21
As the digital computing period approaches its centennial milestone, we can now see clearly its natural offspring coming to into the fold.
That offspring is the next computing paradigm, and while the old digital may run somewhere at the boundary with hardware (for a while), the natural heir will take the front seat.
That natural heir is obviously as natural as the progression from counting instances, to counting in itself.
That is to say, that the next era of computing, the natural offspring of the digital system, is the algebraic one. The causal time of N is here, and it will be just the beginning. May we do justice to all those who placed a stone in its wall, and may its structure serve their hopes for the betterment of mankind.
41
Maybe we should call the Ionian tradition the Reflective tradition, instead of the Critical/Rational tradition. Maybe it will help our contemporary society on what “rationality” is, rather than what it seems after the 20th century of the self…
1
35
This - cannot - be - real!
i'm going to offer a rebuttal to absolutely everything @pmarca has said about introspection here.
and Marc, i say this respectfully, with peace and love. i would still love your support one day 😜
but this has to be said.
<3
context:
so, in a recent interview, Marc proudly declared he has "zero" introspection - "as little as possible" - and then made one of the most historically inaccurate claims i've ever heard a public intellectual say out loud:
"if you go back 100 years ago, it never would have occurred to anybody to be introspective. all of the modern conceptions around introspection are manufactured in the 1910s, 1920s."
he went further:
"great men of history didn't sit around doing this stuff at any prior point. it's all a new construct."
he blamed freud. he called it a "guilt-based whammy" from vienna designed to make individuals second-guess themselves. he said the best founders operate at "0% neuroticism" - no self-examination, no looking back. just forward. just go.
right...
except theres a huge problem with this: virtually every great mind in recorded human history disagrees with him.
lets take this part case by case-
socrates (469–399 BC) said "the unexamined life is not worth living" — and was executed rather than stop examining it. that was 2,400 years before freud opened a practice in vienna.
marcus aurelius (121–180 AD) - roman emperor, the most powerful man alive - kept a private journal of ruthless self-examination. night after night, entry after entry: where am i failing? what are my weaknesses? how do i govern my own reactions before i govern rome? that journal became the meditations, one of the most influential texts in western civilization. marc says "great men of history didn't sit around doing this stuff." marcus aurelius literally ran the roman empire while doing exactly this.
seneca (4 BC–65 AD) described his nightly introspective practice: "when the light has been removed and my wife has fallen silent, i examine my entire day and go back over what i've done and said, hiding nothing from myself and passing nothing by." that's therapy without a therapist. two thousand years before anyone in vienna was born.
augustine of hippo (354–430 AD) wrote the confessions - 13 books of pure introspection examining his desires, his motivations, the nature of memory itself. it's considered the first autobiography in western literature. 1,500 years before freud.
the buddha (5th century BC) built an entire system of practice around it. vipassanā literally means "clear seeing" - seeing into your own mind. the entire buddhist tradition is introspection formalized into a path of liberation.
confucius (551–479 BC): "i daily examine myself on three points." self-examination was a prerequisite for ethical governance in chinese philosophy, not a weakness.
lao tzu: "knowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom."
the upanishads (800–200 BC) made self-knowledge - ātman - the central pursuit of human existence.
montaigne (1533–1592) literally invented the essay as a literary form - and the entire point of it was self-examination. the word "essay" comes from essayer: to try, to test. he was testing himself on paper. four centuries before freud.
benjamin franklin created a systematic daily self-examination practice, tracking 13 virtues on a grid and reviewing his own behavior every single night. he wrote about it extensively in his autobiography.
leonardo da vinci filled thousands of pages of private notebooks with constant self-questioning, to-do lists for self-improvement, and reflections on his own thinking process.
thomas jefferson - whom marc literally name-drops in this same interview as a "founder-type" - kept meticulous journals, wrote extensively about his own contradictions, and advised: "when angry, count to ten before you speak. if very angry, count to a hundred." that's emotional self-regulation through introspection.
alexander the great - also name-dropped by marc — slept with a copy of homer's iliad annotated by aristotle under his pillow. he was consumed with measuring himself against mythological heroes. that's introspection filtered through narrative identity.
every major civilization on earth - greek, roman, indian, chinese, japanese, islamic - independently arrived at the same conclusion: the examined inner life is the highest form of human development. not a weakness. not a disease. the pinnacle.
Marc's claim isn't just wrong. it's the kind of wrong that like requires never having read a single primary source from before 1900. that kind of wrong.
theres another layer to this that kinda makes all of this even more mind boggling to me - even his own peers, the founders he holds up as exemplars, practice exactly what he dismisses...
steve jobs did extensive zen meditation for decades. he credited it with sharpening his intuition and decision-making. he traveled to india specifically seeking inner knowledge. he once said his time meditating was the most important thing he ever did.
elon musk has spoken repeatedly about examining his own first-principles thinking - the process of questioning your own assumptions down to bedrock. that is introspection. it's directed inward at your own reasoning patterns.
mark zuckerberg did year-long personal challenges - reading a book every two weeks, learning mandarin, running every day, meeting someone new every day - each one designed as structured self-improvement through self-examination. you can't design a personal challenge without first looking inward at what needs to change.
ray dalio built an entire management philosophy - principles - around radical self-awareness. he literally calls it "the most important thing."
jeff bezos has talked about his "regret minimization framework" - a deeply introspective thought exercise where you project yourself to age 80 and look back at your decisions. that's introspection operating across a lifetime.
you see what i mean? these are marc's people...his world. and they all do the thing he says nobody needs to do.
okay now *this* is the part that really matters here (to me, at least):
what Marc is actually describing when he says "introspection" isn't introspection at all. it's rumination. and those are **opposites*.
rumination is dwelling on the past. spiraling. getting stuck in loops of regret and self-criticism. it's correlated with depression and paralysis.
rumination is genuinely counterproductive. it is all the things Marc describes introspection being.
introspection is self-awareness. its pattern recognition applied to your own mind. understanding your motivations, your biases, your blind spots. it iss correlated with better decision-making, stronger leadership, and longer-lasting impact.
Marc has confused the disease with the medicine - and built an entire philosophy around avoiding the cure because he thinks it's the illness.
the deepest irony: the claim that introspection is useless requires zero introspection to make. like...he didn't examine it. he didn't check it against history. he didn't question his own assumption or anything. he just said it, it felt right, and he kept going. then doubled down bc thats what supports the claim that he doesnt introspect.
he even almost catches himself in the interview: "to actually analyze that properly would require a level of therapy that i'm not willing to engage in."
he knows there's something under there. he just doesn't want to look, i guess?
and that's fine as a personal choice. but don't dress it up as history. don't claim that socrates, marcus aurelius, the buddha, confucius, augustine, leonardo, franklin, jefferson, and every contemplative tradition in human civilization were all doing something that was "invented" by sigmund freud in 1920, man...like wtf.
that's not a bold take, imho, it's just not having done the reading.
(yes, claude did help me write this. no, that doesnt mean its any less sincere.)
49
I actually had a plan for how to release my works - manifesto, essays, treatises - from their sequence to their polishings, and so on.
Did the reaction to @pmarca across the west just one shotted me?
I cannot believe my eyes, all of these apparently learned men, these apparently vigorous intellects, these free spirits, have crumbled at the lowest of tests when it placed a mirror in front if them.
And as any good magical mirror, it showed them what they wanted to see.
I’m sure that Marc could have phrased things more efficiently, but still, they insisted on missing the point…
Did this just nudge me over the top? Is it the rising pressure releasing the works just looking for an excuse?
Is this thin, temporary stream really going to break the dam?
I hope not…I hope not….
17





