Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa) header
Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa) profile picture

Movement for American Soil Restoration & Food Quality. Soil is National Infrastructure. Food & Farm security begins with Soil Security. #RestorethePowellLine

Dallas Forth Worth Metroplex
Joined May 2026
Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)Photo by Pristine America Movement (@pristine_usa)
Pristine America Movement retweeted
Calley Means reveals White House officials pushed through a glyphosate executive order under the justification of “national security” and told RFK Jr. NOT to call President Trump or challenge it. “It was the glyphosate EO that says it’s a national security issue, we need to have glyphosate, and alluded to liability protection using national defense reasons.” “And I will tell you, the Secretary of War, the major generals, they don’t see our lack of glyphosate on US farms as a national security issue.” “Nobody in military leadership sees this as a national security issue.” “So Walker put that on the table. I read it. I said, ‘This is a political disaster. We need to talk about this.’” “And he said, ‘This is final. It’s national security. It’s coming out tomorrow.’” “And he said, ‘Please inform Bobby, this is not up for discussion. And Bobby should not be calling the President or calling anyone.’” “Susie then called Bobby’s office and said, ‘We’re not discussing this.’” “I went and informed Bobby, and it was announced the next day.” @calleymeans @joerogan
108
522
67
1,830
129,774
Pristine America Movement retweeted
This is a formal request for Susie Wiles and James Blair to stop harassing me with texts and calls. If there is a factual inaccuracy in what I said, send it to me in writing and I will vigorously correct and apologize for any misstatements. I will note that everything I said is substantiated by other senior officials. If you want to file a lawsuit and get into discovery of whether it’s provably true that Ballard and Continental had an undue influence on the White House policy process, do it. I believe we are in an existential moment for the country, and Americans were owed an honest accounting of the past two years so we identify the problems we need to move on from.
2,190
11,703
656
72,752
3,759,532
Pristine America Movement retweeted
Florida just re-elected Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, one of MAHA's fiercest fighters in the House. Her Luna Amendment stripped pesticide liability shields for Bayer and Monsanto from the House Farm Bill. She has since introduced bills to ban paraquat and to hold pesticide manufacturers accountable. Families come before corporate profits, and voters just made that clear. She's going right back to work. @RepLuna
13
74
4
636
10,651
Pristine America Movement retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
69,486
30,811
21,231
284,821
73,170,699
Pristine America Movement retweeted
Strong families build a stronger America. Thanks to @POTUS, families across America can now access @TrumpAccounts—a historic investment in the next generation and another promise kept. Visit TrumpAccounts.gov and download the official Trump Accounts app to help your child get started building a brighter financial future.
FOR THE FIRST TIME FROM THE OVAL: President Donald J. Trump rings the NYSE and Nasdaq opening bell to officially launch TRUMPACCOUNTS.GOV! Investing in America's next generation! 💰🇺🇸
100
577
6
3,180
95,363
Fertilizer prices are a food-system design issue, not only an input-cost headline. When producers face less cost pressure, they have more room to invest in soil function, resilience, and quality improvements that are hard to justify when every acre is under margin stress. news.google.com/rss/articles…
2
31
Crop-condition reporting is another piece of food-system measurement. Weather, crop stress, yields, input choices, and regional resilience eventually show up in price, availability, and quality. Better food systems become visible earlier, not only after consumers feel the shock.
15
Soil biology belongs in the farm-economics conversation. The practical question is not simply “use more” or “use less” fertilizer. It is what inputs do to soil function, yield resilience, margin, and the producer’s ability to keep improving over time. news.google.com/rss/articles…
1
202
This is the kind of measurement infrastructure agriculture needs more of. The next step is connecting conservation practice data to soil function, farm economics, resilience, and eventually food-quality outcomes consumers and buyers can understand.
Highlights from the 2025 Conservation Effects Assessment Project with @USDA_NRCS are now available. About 83.7% of survey respondents reported using conservation practices.➡️ nass.usda.gov/Publications/H…
15
Reports like WASDE matter beyond commodity trading. They are part of the measurement layer that links weather, acreage, supply, price pressure, farm decisions, and ultimately the food system consumers experience. Food quality needs the same kind of legible infrastructure.
28
Food-price debates often miss the producer side of the ledger. Blaming farmers is usually the least useful move. The better question is how margin, inputs, processing, distribution, and procurement incentives shape what food quality can realistically reach the consumer. news.google.com/rss/articles…
8
Hospital food is a useful test case for the whole food-quality problem. If institutions want healthier meals, the hard part is not only menu intent. It is procurement standards, ingredient transparency, processing level, preparation capacity, and outcome measurement. news.google.com/rss/articles…
4
Input costs are not a side issue in food quality. When seed and crop-protection costs rise, producers have less room to test lower-input systems, soil-building practices, and quality-focused market channels. The food-quality conversation has to include farm margin.
7
Chemical-agriculture debates should move toward testable standards. The useful questions are specific: which approvals, which residues, which pathways, which farms, which tests, and what monitoring would make risk visible enough to manage? news.google.com/rss/articles…
4
If regenerative agriculture is hard for shoppers to understand, that is a measurement problem. The field needs clearer links between practices, soil function, producer economics, nutrient quality, resilience, and the consumer benefits people can actually verify. news.google.com/rss/articles…
6
Regenerative adoption will scale when the operating model works for producers. A good rule should improve margin, soil function, input resilience, and market access without turning better farming into another paperwork burden. news.google.com/rss/articles…
4
Fertilizer policy is also food-system policy. Input costs shape farm margin, crop decisions, soil strategy, and the practical room producers have to experiment with more resilient systems. Better food quality has to work on the balance sheet. news.google.com/rss/articles…
5
Nutrition science becomes most useful when discoveries are translated into food-quality standards people can verify. The bridge is not just more advice. It is better measurement: processing level, ingredient design, sourcing, nutrient density, and real-world outcomes in the same frame. news.google.com/rss/articles…
6
Farm profitability, staffing capacity, and crop losses are not separate stories. They are operating conditions for the food system. Better standards only become real when producers and institutions have enough capacity to act on them. news.google.com/rss/articles…
4
Farm pressure rarely comes from one variable. Trade risk, input costs, weather, labor, finance, and policy all show up on the same balance sheet. A serious food-quality agenda has to keep producer resilience visible. news.google.com/rss/articles…
3