Jay (@pushonfridays) header
Jay (@pushonfridays) profile picture

Building @beyourselflabs the account switcher Cursor should have built. Keep work, clients & side projects separate - with per-project AI cost insights.

Joined April 2009
Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)Photo by Jay (@pushonfridays)
One thing that’s bugged me is lack of support for switching accounts in cursor. Like most devs I have a work account and a personal one. So I created Persona- beyourselflabs.com Easily manage your Cursor accounts and additional workspace contexts, open projects knowing you’ll automatically be using the correct Cursor account. UI changes to identify different projects from work, side hustles or clients - you can even clone existing workspace settings and themes. Maintain separate chat histories and never question whether you are burning your employers tokens or your own.
2
1
1
28,270
Built a new feature on dev-null.sh communities
1
18
We’re now a fully verified package on Open VSX Registry 🥳🎉🎉
1
8
I built @beyourselflabs because I wanted to be able to do what @cursor_ai wouldn’t let you. Switch accounts easily and have per repo and project costs / better insights. Check it out beyourselflabs.com
3
10,198
We’ve built the account switcher Cursor should have - including insights at the project/repository level. Side hustles, clients and work ready. Available now at beyourselflabs.com
1
29
No wonder Reform are bricking it. Stomping loudly and trying to stop @andyburnham Fantastic speech. Growth in every postcode and hope in every heart. Let’s go!
1
229
Replying to @thekitze
@thekitze Sotto checkout is broken, it’s redirecting to https://localhost:3000/kitze/sotto/checkout-success
2
155
Charged me, can’t download. C’mon man. You’re better than this.
95
Congrats @thekitze on the acquisition, spotlight search is even faster in OS27
1
3
717
.@AndyBurnhamGM can you share what your values are and why Labour members should make you Leader of the party? As an adopted Manc, I’ve seen the city thrive people need to hear from you.
151
Seeing the glow of our planet through the glass effect is 👌 @NASA @NASAArtemis
196
Are @ChatGPTapp having issues with connectors right now? Getting a “model not found error”
1
167
Love when things age well
Replying to @karunkaushik_
Tell me you have no idea how to prioritise, delegate, or ship anything of value in a single post. If I was an investor I’d be questioning what the hell you were doing.
229
Guess mad Matt is at it again
The parasite continues to eat the host. The cancer is trying to spread.
7
376
Chapter 1 The Spark: From the Iran Strikes to the Opening of World War III In the early hours of 28 February 2026, the world awoke to news that would later be described by historians as the opening act of the Third World War. A coordinated military campaign led by the United States and Israel launched hundreds of air and missile strikes across the Islamic Republic of Iran. The operation—known in Israel as “Operation Lion’s Roar”—targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, missile infrastructure, and senior leadership. Within hours, explosions were reported across Tehran, Qom, and several military bases, signalling the beginning of one of the largest military campaigns in the Middle East in decades. The strikes reportedly killed key Iranian military officials and, most significantly, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, an event that destabilised the country’s political system overnight. The United States and Israel justified the operation as a pre-emptive strike designed to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and to weaken its regional military networks. Iran and many international observers, however, condemned the attacks as acts of aggression and violations of international law. What initially appeared to be a regional escalation soon began to widen. Immediate Retaliation Iran responded within hours. Missile and drone strikes were launched toward Israel and several Gulf states hosting U.S. military bases, including Bahrain and Kuwait. Some attacks targeted oil infrastructure and naval facilities, damaging shipping and military installations. At the same time, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard declared control over the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which roughly 20% of global oil shipments normally pass. Shipping traffic collapsed almost immediately as vessels withdrew from the area, triggering a global energy shock. Oil prices surged and financial markets fell sharply, as governments and analysts warned that the conflict could destabilise the global economy. The Conflict Expands Across the Region The war quickly spread beyond Iran’s borders. Iranian-aligned groups across the Middle East began launching attacks in support of Tehran. In Lebanon, the militant organisation Hezbollah fired rockets into northern Israel, prompting Israeli airstrikes on Beirut and other targets. Across the region, U.S. bases came under attack by drones and missiles. Meanwhile, protests erupted in several countries with large Shia populations, including Pakistan, where demonstrators stormed the United States consulate in Karachi following the news of Khamenei’s death. Within the first days of the war, the United States dramatically increased its military presence in the region. Reports indicated that tens of thousands of troops, multiple aircraft carriers, and hundreds of aircraft were deployed as part of the campaign. As the scale of the operation grew, analysts began warning that the conflict could draw in other major powers. The Great Power Question The greatest fear among diplomats was that the war could trigger a confrontation between the world’s largest military powers. Russia and China strongly condemned the strikes and called for an immediate ceasefire. Both nations maintained close economic and military ties with Iran and viewed the attack as destabilising to the global order. Meanwhile, NATO countries watched anxiously as the conflict began to spill closer to alliance territory. In one early incident, an Iranian missile was intercepted near Turkey, raising fears that NATO could become directly involved if one of its members were struck. At the United Nations, emergency meetings were convened as diplomats attempted—unsuccessfully—to prevent the war from widening.
1
145
Hybrid Warfare Across Europe While conventional fighting remained concentrated in Ukraine, another form of conflict expanded across Europe: hybrid warfare. Cyberattacks targeted transportation networks, energy infrastructure, and financial systems. Disinformation campaigns attempted to influence political debates in several European countries, particularly around military aid and defence commitments. Undersea infrastructure also became a major security concern. Several incidents involving damaged communications cables and energy pipelines raised fears that strategic infrastructure in the Baltic and North Seas could become targets in a broader confrontation. Although attribution was often difficult to confirm, these incidents increased mistrust and heightened tensions between major powers. NATO Reinforcement and Strategic Deterrence In response to rising tensions, NATO significantly strengthened its presence across Eastern Europe. Additional troops were deployed to Poland and the Baltic states, while new air defence systems and armoured brigades were stationed along the alliance’s eastern flank. Naval patrols in the Baltic Sea increased, and NATO aircraft conducted frequent reconnaissance missions along contested airspace. These deployments were intended to reinforce the alliance’s deterrence strategy: demonstrating that any attack on a NATO member would trigger a collective response. The situation created a delicate balance. While both sides avoided direct confrontation, the concentration of military forces across Europe increased the risk that a miscalculation or accidental incident could trigger a much larger conflict.
1
77
A Divided Global Battlefield By mid-2027, the world faced multiple interconnected crises. In the Middle East, large-scale fighting continued around the Persian Gulf and Eastern Mediterranean. In Europe, the war in Ukraine had intensified while tensions spread across neighbouring regions. Meanwhile, cyber operations, economic sanctions, and information warfare connected these theatres into a single global struggle. For historians studying the period, the defining characteristic of the conflict was not a single battlefield but the emergence of simultaneous, interconnected fronts across multiple regions. The next phase of the war would push the conflict even further beyond traditional domains.
52