Replying to @corbtt
What happens if you have hundreds of tools? Is the right approach to RL every model after every checkpoint for every new tool?
Replying to @TicTocTick
Has to be like 18% interest for the payment to make sense
Replying to @mcuban @KamalaHarris
Doesn鈥檛 that assume there isn鈥檛 another way to make the product without COG that are being tariffed?
Replying to @rakyll
Ya I meant why don鈥檛 we do all the logic the docker/proxy is doing behind the API so migration is simple. This feels complicated enough to just use a different model
Replying to @rakyll
Why force creating the proxy? Can鈥檛 we just have a custom URL and pass the url and key into the client in Python directly. Simplify the code example
Replying to @iamgingertrash @levelsio
Please. I have M3 96gb
Replying to @spectate_or
Some tokenization bug during some training?
Replying to @damonchen
How do you know Adobe is doing a branded search term and not a keywordless ad?
Replying to @TheStalwart
I mostly buy it based on the expected discounted sum of future cash flows. It feels fairly priced right now
Replying to @c_gro
There is no high watermark for Ackmans fund?
This holds true for Cos(emb(t2), emb(t1+t2)) < cos(emb(t2), emb(t2+t1)) as well. So the second string doesn鈥檛 matter.
OpenAIs new embedding seems to really prefer earlier text. Cos(emb(t1), emb(t1+t2)) > Cos(emb(t1), emb(t2+t1)) ~97% of the time of the 1000 examples I tried. Interesting retrieval consideration
Replying to @rohindhar
Definitely getting interesting but doesn鈥檛 seem insane yet



