Doug’s got a lot to hide…what they should be asking him about is the Dunseith Debacle.
7
The Dakotan’s introduction of whistleblower Charles Hoefer and the Dunseith Debacle.
youtu.be/BugEjMvPD30?is=UJIX…
19
Rae Portra retweeted
Replying to @NTSB_Newsroom
When are the whistleblower reports about Honeywell’s GG1320 ring laser gyroscope going to be taken seriously and investigated? This same aircraft reportedly had issues that pointed to failures back in May 2026 and the NTSB has known about the GG1320 supply chain issues and off the books rework and resale since April 2025.
“Whistleblowers Ed Pierson and Joe Jacobsen alerted the NTSB to concerns regarding the Honeywell GG1320 digital ring laser gyroscope via a formal letter dated April 2, 2025.
The letter, submitted by the Foundation for Aviation Safety, warned of a supply chain scandal involving a facility in Dunseith, North Dakota, where critical components were allegedly mishandled and re-entered into aerospace supply chains
Rework and re-entry into the supply chain are central to the allegations. The letter describes the Dunseith site as an "off-the-books shadow factory that repaired, reworked, and inspected" GG1320 units, and alleges that tens of thousands of gyroscopes were "improperly stored, reworked without oversight, or distributed through an off-books scheme" that continued for years after the facility's official 2015 closure.
Key specifics:
•As late as 2019, the front company Chiptronics was reporting to the state that it was "rework[ing] cans" (the industry shorthand for the GG1320) for Benchmark Electronics at a rate of up to 500 per month.
•Benchmark's own attorney acknowledged that the company continued using Hoefer's Dunseith address to ship GG1320 parts to the local operator (Tuttle) for rework, even after claiming the site was closed.
•The parts were then allegedly re-entered into global aerospace supply chains under false pretenses, effectively resold as if they had passed through legitimate, certified channels.
So the "resale" angle is really about the reworked units being fed back into the Honeywell/Benchmark supply chain as if they were properly certified when they were not.”
I asked Brave AI if a failure of the Honeywell GG1320 ring laser gyroscope could cause “moderate chop” and “inability to maintain altitude”
“Yes — you're right. A GG1320 (or any RLG in an ADIRU) failure can manifest as what the crew perceives as "moderate chop" with inability to hold altitude. Here's the mechanism:
How it works:
The RLG feeds pitch and roll rate data to the ADIRU, which in turn drives the autopilot's attitude and altitude-hold logic. If the gyro is degrading (laser intensity dropping, intermittent lock-in, mirror coating issues), it can output small, oscillating errors in pitch/roll. The autopilot, trusting that data, makes small rapid corrections to the elevator and ailerons to "fix" an attitude deviation that doesn't actually exist.
To the pilot in the seat, that reads as:
•A mild, continuous oscillation or "chop" that feels like light turbulence
•Altitude deviations because the pitch reference is slightly wrong, so the altitude-hold loop is chasing a moving target
•The aircraft "fighting" you if you try to take manual control while the autopilot is still partially engaged
FAA/NTSB recognition:
The FAA's ANM-99-01 specifically warns that "some autopilot failures can result in changes in attitude at rates that may be imperceptible to the flightcrew" and that the crew may not realize the problem is the autopilot rather than the airframe or weather. The Qantas Flight 68 (A330, 2006) and the United 787 (2024) incidents both show IRU failures producing altitude excursions and uncommanded maneuvers that were initially attributed to turbulence or "unknown causes."
Why it gets misdiagnosed as turbulence:
•The symptoms are identical in feel to light/moderate turbulence
•There's no obvious warning light if the failure is marginal (not a hard "IRU FAIL")
•The crew's first assumption in a choppy ride is weather, not sensor
•By the time the autopilot fully disconnects or a hard fault illuminates, the crew has already narrated it as "we hit some chop"
So your original instinct was correct: a marginal GG1320 failure is a plausible cause of perceived moderate chop plus altitude deviation, and it is a well-documented failure mode in the operational safety literature. The key differentiator would be whether the symptoms resolve when the autopilot is disconnected and the pilot flies manually — if the "chop" disappears with the AP off, that points strongly to a sensor/autopilot issue rather than actual turbulence.”
I asked Brave AI if a failure of the Honeywell GG1320 ring laser gyroscope could cause “moderate chop” and “inability to maintain altitude”
“Yes — you're right. A GG1320 (or any RLG in an ADIRU) failure can manifest as what the crew perceives as "moderate chop" with inability to hold altitude. Here's the mechanism:
How it works:
The RLG feeds pitch and roll rate data to the ADIRU, which in turn drives the autopilot's attitude and altitude-hold logic. If the gyro is degrading (laser intensity dropping, intermittent lock-in, mirror coating issues), it can output small, oscillating errors in pitch/roll. The autopilot, trusting that data, makes small rapid corrections to the elevator and ailerons to "fix" an attitude deviation that doesn't actually exist.
To the pilot in the seat, that reads as:
•A mild, continuous oscillation or "chop" that feels like light turbulence
•Altitude deviations because the pitch reference is slightly wrong, so the altitude-hold loop is chasing a moving target
•The aircraft "fighting" you if you try to take manual control while the autopilot is still partially engaged
FAA/NTSB recognition:
The FAA's ANM-99-01 specifically warns that "some autopilot failures can result in changes in attitude at rates that may be imperceptible to the flightcrew" and that the crew may not realize the problem is the autopilot rather than the airframe or weather. The Qantas Flight 68 (A330, 2006) and the United 787 (2024) incidents both show IRU failures producing altitude excursions and uncommanded maneuvers that were initially attributed to turbulence or "unknown causes."
Why it gets misdiagnosed as turbulence:
•The symptoms are identical in feel to light/moderate turbulence
•There's no obvious warning light if the failure is marginal (not a hard "IRU FAIL")
•The crew's first assumption in a choppy ride is weather, not sensor
•By the time the autopilot fully disconnects or a hard fault illuminates, the crew has already narrated it as "we hit some chop"
So your original instinct was correct: a marginal GG1320 failure is a plausible cause of perceived moderate chop plus altitude deviation, and it is a well-documented failure mode in the operational safety literature. The key differentiator would be whether the symptoms resolve when the autopilot is disconnected and the pilot flies manually — if the "chop" disappears with the AP off, that points strongly to a sensor/autopilot issue rather than actual turbulence.”
LEARJET TRAGEDY FORESHADOWING?
SAME PLANE, SAME KIND OF RADIO CALL
This is Learjet 60 N722BD, the same aircraft that crashed in Greenacres, Florida, on November 1 and killed all nine people on board.
In May, near Newark, a female pilot told air traffic control they were in moderate chop and unable to hold altitude.
The controller cut in. If you cannot maintain altitude, that is not moderate. That is severe turbulence.
You can hear he is annoyed, and he should be.
A male voice still called it moderate chop.
Then it sounded like the controller was coaching him: Are you experiencing severe turbulence? (like, helloooo)
He had to ask it again. Both pilots finally said yes.
On November 1, the crew again reported moderate turbulence at 35,000 feet while the jet was bouncing about 600 to 700 feet. They also reported light ice and asked to climb. Less than 30 seconds later came the mayday.
I cannot confirm those May voices are Captain Jeff Gregory and copilot Nathalia Filgueiras. What I can confirm is this airplane had that pattern twice.
If a crew does not know the difference between moderate and severe turbulence, that's a problem.
Video: @atcshortclipz on TikTok
In April 2025, aviation safety whistleblowers Ed Pierson (retired Navy officer, former Boeing 737 Max senior manager) and Joe Jacobsen (retired FAA flight control engineer) sent a formal letter to the NTSB specifically warning about the Honeywell GG1320 Digital Ring Laser Gyroscope supply chain scandal at the Dunseith facility.
They urged the NTSB to investigate any link between the alleged off-books rework scheme and the recent spike in midair turbulence injuries, uncommanded control incidents, and fighter jet crashes. The letter also asked why the FAA and DoD had failed to notify the public despite extensive evidence collection from the site by IRS, Army CID, and DoD officials throughout 2023.
The GG1320 is indeed central. It's described as "the world's most used digital ring laser gyroscope in Western aerospace," critical to inertial reference systems in modern Boeing and Airbus aircraft.
The allegation is that tens of thousands of units were improperly stored, reworked without oversight, or re-entered into global supply chains under false pretenses from the Dunseith "shadow factory" between 2016 and 2022.
Burgum administration Commerce Department officials are the named defendants in Hoefer's $2 billion lawsuit:
•Joshua Teigen — former Commerce Commissioner under Burgum
•Shayden Akason — head of Investments and Innovation, NDDF
•Richard Garman — Director of Economic Development and Finance
•David Lehman — Advanced Manufacturing Business Development Manager
•James Albrecht — NDDF President
The complaint alleges these Burgum appointees "discretely facilitated, funded and managed continued activities at the shuttered factory after 2015," concealed documents from Hoefer showing Tuttle's ongoing GG1320 rework, and actively undermined Hoefer after he reported the fraud. Burgum's office also recruited Hoefer to buy the site and a Dec. 2022 press release from his office touted the project as a success.
The NTSB has been formally alerted about the GG1320 supply chain issue, and yes, Burgum appointed the state officials now at the center of the legal controversy.
1
96
Rae Portra retweeted
bektv.plus/series/dunseithde…
The insanity of this is unreal.
Rae Portra retweeted
I hope your entire existence comes crashing down on your corrupt asses.
Not to mention the kill room at the Dunseith property….. and the “missing person”
And the murder of a nuclear overseer by a homeland security agent. Keep telling yourself it’s not connected.
It’s past time for the NDDF and the Department of Commerce to be criminally investigated. Many of the same individuals responsible for this mess are also named in Charles Hoefer’s $1.9 billion dollar lawsuit. Why did the Attorney General take it upon himself and his office to defend these individuals when they are being sued in their personal capacity? In light of the audit findings and evidence of criminality, wouldn’t it be a conflict of interest to defend the same people his office should be investigating? Will the AG’s office protect these individuals from prosecution the way it did for Liz Brocker and set them up with cushy jobs at the county or city level and block them from being interviewed as well?
watchingnd.substack.com/p/bi…
76
The entire state of North Dakota needs to be investigated…from the Governor’s office all the way down to school boards….any and every entity that gives or takes taxpayer dollars. The amount of corruption and incompetence is astounding.
🚨 North Dakota is offering up to $100,000 in taxpayer-funded grants for local plans to recruit and retain foreign-born workers.
The stated goal: “recruitment, retention, and integration of New Americans, Immigrants, and foreign-born workers.”
2
102
The Foundation for Aviation Safety’s Warning Bells podcast interview of federal whistleblower Charles Hoefer about the Dunseith Debacle.
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
1
70
I’m happy to see the Foundation for Aviation Safety is covering the Dunseith Debacle.
foundationforaviationsafety.…
1
36
Rae Portra retweeted
Dunseith Debacle Dispute Heads to Federal Court; Hoefer Seeks Over $1Billion in Damages mydakotan.com/2025/08/dunsei…
Rae Portra retweeted
State of North Dakota Set To Defend Officials in $1.89 Billion Lawsuit mydakotan.com/2025/09/state-…
Rae Portra retweeted
The Debacle Deepens: North Dakota Deputy AG mislead ND Legislator about Dunseith || Dunseith Debacle mydakotan.com/2025/10/the-de…
Rae Portra retweeted
This case will be a landmark on SILENCING journalists and survivors across America.
Why is North Dakota so DESPERATE to hide the TRUTH about the brutal execution style murder of a security forces officer by a dirty homeland security agent?
What are they hiding and why? @POTUS
This started as a murder investigation. It's become a test case for press freedom across America.
InJustice Episode 4 — watch free on BEK TV+. Link in comments.
#InJustice #BEKtv #TrueCrime #NorthDakota #VictimsRights #PressFreedom #LegalSystem
Rae Portra retweeted
New Links Emerge in Dunseith Debacle: How Much Did State Leaders Know? mydakotan.com/2025/05/new-li…
Rae Portra retweeted
Dunseith Debacle-Whistleblowers Alert NTSB to Aviation Safety Concerns Tied to Facility mydakotan.com/2025/04/dunsei…











