Pinned Tweet
russia must lose and lose badly. russia must crawl on its knees out of Ukraine, begging for mercy. That is what every dictator on this planet needs to see."
"As long as it takes", is a bad strategy for everyone. We must plan for Ukraine to win and for Russia to lose this war badly. If not, we will have more such wars this century.
Russia needs to lose, and lose badly. That's what every dictator on the planet needs to see. Our ability or failure to stop and punish Russia's crimes in #Ukraine will deter or encourage the aggression of dictatorships worldwide, and thereby determine the course of this century.
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
If this comes as a surprise to you, I've told you this 20 times.
The rest of Donetsk is NOT the peace deal.
It's the starting point for russian demands. Those demands (accept or we go back to war) will include demands from the EU and NATO.
Plus russian immunity for war crimes.
🚨 Putin plans to use Ukraine peace talks to push NATO back to its 1997 military posture
According to The Telegraph, the Kremlin wants to force NATO to scale back its military presence in Europe to levels seen before Eastern European countries joined the Alliance.
This could mean demanding the withdrawal of NATO forces from Poland, the Baltic states, and Finland.
That is why Moscow is pushing for European countries to participate in negotiations over Ukraine. Diplomatic sources cited by The Telegraph say Putin wants to turn talks about ending the war into negotiations over the entire European security architecture.
The issue may also have been discussed during Putin's three-hour meeting with Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, in St. Petersburg.
However, European countries have previously rejected the Kremlin's demands to reduce NATO's military presence on its eastern flank.
Natuurlijk wil Rusland dit: dan hebben ze vrij spel om nog meer landen binnen te vallen. En trap niet in de truc: het Kremlin gooit expres absurde eisen op tafel, zodat het opgeven van Oekraïne straks als een ‘redelijk compromis’ wordt verkocht.
Fuck no!
🚨 Putin plans to use Ukraine peace talks to push NATO back to its 1997 military posture
According to The Telegraph, the Kremlin wants to force NATO to scale back its military presence in Europe to levels seen before Eastern European countries joined the Alliance.
This could mean demanding the withdrawal of NATO forces from Poland, the Baltic states, and Finland.
That is why Moscow is pushing for European countries to participate in negotiations over Ukraine. Diplomatic sources cited by The Telegraph say Putin wants to turn talks about ending the war into negotiations over the entire European security architecture.
The issue may also have been discussed during Putin's three-hour meeting with Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, in St. Petersburg.
However, European countries have previously rejected the Kremlin's demands to reduce NATO's military presence on its eastern flank.
Alle MAGA-aanhangers en Russische bots zijn duidelijk op hun teentjes getrapt nu Elon op zijn eigen tegenstrijdigheden wordt aangesproken. Blijkbaar mag je van alles beweren, zolang niemand je maar confronteert met je eigen leugens.
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
Volledig akkoord. We mogen daar helemaal niet bang voor zijn. Weerwerk bieden is de enige taal die begrepen wordt in deze wereld van vandaag.
De VS dreigen met zware sancties als Europa met alternatief voor Musks Starlink komt. We moeten daar niet te bang voor zijn. Ook Donald Trump staat politiek wankel
demorgen.be/meningen/de-vs-d…
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
That's not my definition of either free speech or democracy.
Elon Musk has cemented his record as the largest individual political donor in modern American history.
Musk poured $446 million of his own money into this year’s midterm elections, mostly aimed at preserving the Republican Party’s control of Congress. wapo.st/4igb5Kq
Europe, it’s time to pressure Musk. We’re paying for this, and the story is nonsense: Starlink/Starshield is used by Ukraine itself, for defensive purposes, and has been for years. Lift the restrictions or we stop paying. There must be serious consequences.
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
Elon Musk claims that Ukraine allegedly violated Starlink's terms of use and used the system on combat drones.
As someone who was inside the process at the Ministry of Defense, I can say with certainty that this is not true.
In February of this year, whitelists were introduced. Stationary terminals could be registered by both military personnel and civilians.
But for any satellite terminal to work while on the move, it had to be added to a special list and connected to the military Starshield system. Otherwise, no satellite communication terminals in Ukraine would work.
In other words, using civilian Starlink for drone missions was technically impossible. All drone missions that required satellite communication could only be carried out using Starshield.
We are very grateful to the United States and SpaceX for access to critically important satellite communications. Ukraine did not violate the terms of use.
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
This is a confession to treason.
Elon Musk, a private individual and not an elected official, hijacked U.S. national defence policy to harm partner Ukraine and help enemy Russia.
cbc.ca/news/world/ukraine-st…
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
This is more evidence for Congress, which can easily determine if Ukraine violated any terms of service. It also constitutes a tacit admission by Musk that he played a part — if not the central role — in throttling Starlink.
Nog een reden waarom Europa een eigen satellietnetwerk moet bouwen. Onze veiligheid mag nooit afhangen van de grillen van een miljardair die ons onder druk kan zetten of onze verdediging kan dwarsbomen.
Een miljardair bepaalt hoe Oekraïne zich mag verdedigen. Dronevluchten tegen Russische troepen op bezet Oekraïens grondgebied zijn zelfverdediging, geen “loophole”.
Musk maakt het Kyiv bewust moeilijker.
We zullen het niet vergeten: toen het erop aankwam, koos Musk de kant van Rusland.
Europa, maak alsjeblieft niet opnieuw dezelfde fout. Russische energie is een wapen, geen goedkope handel.
Proposals to resume Russian gas sales to Europe, as reported by @TheEconomist, are flawed and dangerous.
After decades of Russian energy blackmail, Europe has only just begun to achieve true energy independence.
For Moscow, energy is a weapon, not a business. This lesson has been learned the hard way.
In 2019, President Trump's firm decision to halt Nord Stream 2 construction was one of the greatest investments in Europe's security.
By contrast, the US decision to let construction resume in 2021 was one of the gravest strategic mistakes.
Allowing Russian pipelines to bypass Ukraine invited Putin to launch his full-scale invasion.
Past mistakes must be neither forgotten nor repeated. These strategic failures brought no greater prosperity or security — only war, turmoil, and crisis.
An end to this war will not come through concessions, business deals, or flattery. It can end only through strength and by depriving Putin's regime of the resources to continue it.
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
Belangrijk interview in @demorgen
@TomSimoens137: “Wat Rusland probeert lijkt op het bewust uitwissen van de Oekraïense identiteit. De Oekraïense taal, orthodoxe kerk, munt... het wordt verboden. Gevluchte Oekraïners worden door etnische Russen vervangen."demorgen.be/ts-b1f93885/
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
De Belgische veiligheidsdienst staat er al niet zo best op.
‘Leaked WhatsApps between ex-EU commissioner Reynders and senior Belgian spy reveal attempts to bury allegations of his [Reynders, red.] possible Russia ties’
Gift link: euobserver.com/243287/exclus…
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
Kremlin niet bereid tot concessie. Poetin zegt voor zoveelste keer: Oekraine bestaat niet. Rusland heeft geen Oekr. grondgebied bezet, omdat bezette gebied deel is van “historische Rusland” dat nog verder reikt omdat “Russen en Oekraïners één volk” zijn.
kremlin.ru/events/president/…
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
I am a #Canadian and Junior Sergeant in the Armed Forces of #Ukraine.
Yesterday META suspended my Facebook account with 51,000 followers and deactivated my Instagram with almost 30,000 followers.
When my Facebook was reinstated there was no violation flagged only restrictions to posting and commenting for 30 days, a restriction on groups for 1 year, and Marketplace is restricted.
I can no longer sign in on the laptop, it flags my own laptop as suspicious activity even if I confirm it from mobile app.
@Meta and @instagram has not yet replied to any of my attempts to contact them.
They are suppressing the voices of people from around the world.
A brief review of recent technical “errors” at Meta:
1. Restricting the Facebook pages of Brazilian president Lula who is in a runoff election against a Trump-favored candidate
2. Shutting down the pages of Albanians protesting Jared Kushner’s plans to build a luxury resort in the country
3. Rejecting ads for a documentary critical of Elon Musk
4. Shutting down the No Kings instagram page in the middle of a major anti-Trump protest
Robin Osinga 🇳🇱 🇺🇦 retweeted
Former US Secretary of State Pompeo: There have been multiple offers to end the war in Ukraine, including energy ceasefires and a Black Sea agriculture deal.
Every time, Putin has rejected them and Zelenskyy has said yes.
Russia “has been fine”? Hundreds of thousands dead. Millions of lives destroyed. And still, millions will vote for this man. Shame on every one of you.
Waarom praten met de VS en Rusland nu zinloos is:
Oekraïne moet van beide de Donbas opgeven.
De VS wil geen bindende garanties geven die een nieuwe Russische invasie voorkomen.
Rusland eist een veto op buitenlandse troepen aan de nieuwe frontlijn.
Dit is geen vredesakkoord, maar een pauze waarin Rusland zich herbouwt. Dat het Boedapest-memorandum van 1994 ook “niet bindend” bleek, zou een waarschuwing moeten zijn. Het kost op termijn alleen meer slachtoffers.
The deal being proposed to Ukraine right now is that it withdraws from Donbas and sanctions are lifted on russia in exchange for russia promising not to advance any further.
Ukraine gets peace. So Ukraine said, OK, but let's establish guarantees that russia won't advance any further immediately without stopping.
The Trump administration refused to provide any, and russia said it wouldn't allow foreign troops to be present on the new line, no foreign country agreed to provide any either.
In 1994, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances regarding its territorial integrity from russia, the UK, and the USA.
Today, the main argument used to justify russia's violation of those assurances and the USA's refusal to help Ukraine is that the 1994 Budapest Memorandum wasn't legally binding, just like russia's promise today not to attack any further.
So underneath the shiny peace proposal is nothing but a gift to russia and the conditions for the war to continue.






























