RyanHayes (@ryanhayes) header
RyanHayes (@ryanhayes) profile picture

Please be patient with me, I’m still learning.

Austin, TX
Joined March 2008
Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)Photo by RyanHayes (@ryanhayes)
THE PERSONAL PANOPTICON. A few months ago, I started running my life out of Claude Code. Not out of intention to do so, it was just the place where everything met. And it just kept working. Empires are won by conquest. What keeps them standing is something much quieter. Before a king can tax, he must count. Before he can conscript, he must locate. Before he can rule, he must see. Legibility is the precondition for governance. The pre-modern state was blind. It knew precious little about its subjects, their wealth, their landholdings and yields, their location, their very identity. So it built the apparatus of sight: censuses, surnames, maps. Over centuries, the invisible became visible, the illegible became legible, and populations that could be seen could finally be controlled. Now, you are one of n: tracked, monitored, studied by systems you cannot access, much less interrogate. Data is siphoned for purposes you will never fully know. The arrangement is brutally asymmetrical: visibility without reciprocity. A panopticon whose gaze travels outward and never back. The watchtower has multiplied. Today, corporations harvest terabytes of behavioral exhaust, gatekept behind competitive moats, legible only to algorithms optimizing against your interests. Corporate legibility is created by closed joins: they can join your behavior to their ontology, but you can’t join your own behavior across systems. We are drowning in data about ourselves and yet we remain catastrophically blind. Thousands of messages across twenty inboxes. Notifications exile you to a perpetual state of Do Not Disturb. A WHOOP recovery score that decides your mood. Commitments that exist in six places and cohere in none. You are the most measured human in history and the most opaque to yourself. States built legibility infrastructure to govern. Corporations built it to sell. Neither gave you the keys to the tower. The first thing Claude solved was product blindness. NOX now runs on a cron job: pulling Amplitude, cross-referencing GitHub, and pointing me to what needs building. It handles A/B testing, generates winning copy, and has turned customer support into a fully autonomous department. Once I saw this was possible, I chased it everywhere. Email, hitting inbox zero for the first time ever, with auto-drafted replies for everything inbound. Workouts, accommodating horrendously erratic travel schedules. Sleep, built a projector wired to my WHOOP after exactly six hours that wakes me with my favorite phrases. Subscriptions, found and returned $2000 I didn’t know I was paying. The dozen SFMTA citations I'd ignored, the action items I'd procrastinated into oblivion. People are using it to, I discovered, run vending machines, home automation systems, and keep plants alive. The feeling is hard to name. It is the violent gap between how blind you were and how obvious everything feels now with an observer that reads all the feeds, catches what you've unconsciously dropped, notices patterns across domains you'd kept stubbornly separate, and—crucially—tells you what to do about it. My personal finances are now managed in the terminal. Overnight it picks the locks of brokerages that refuse to talk to each other, pulls congressional and hedge fund disclosures, Polymarket odds, X sentiment, headlines and 10-Ks from my watchlist. Every morning, a brief gets added in ~/𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜. Last month it flagged Rep. Fields buying NFLX shares. Three weeks later, the Warner Bros deal. I don't always trade, sometimes I argue with the thesis. But I'm never tracking fifteen tabs at 6am anymore. It feels borderline unfair seeing around corners, being in ten places at once, surveilling yourself with the attention span of a thousand clones. A panopticon still, but the tower belongs to you. A few weeks ago, five friends and I tore into the Epstein files the night they dropped. Thousands of documents parsed into a searchable index: flights, texts, photos, Amazon purchases, properties. By 4am, sleep deprivation bled into something stranger: the disbelief that it just kept working. We were outpacing entire newsrooms. By 7am we shipped Jmail. 18 million people have since searched an inbox that belonged to a dead man. A decade ago this would have taken a team and a quarter of runway. We did it in one night, on pure adrenaline and tools that finally match the pace of ambition. Over Christmas, I watched my parents learn the command line. These are people who never migrated off Microsoft Teams, who treat software updates as personal attacks. I didn't pitch it as coding. I set up an alias, just `𝚌`, and said:  'Type what you want to happen in plain English.' My mom stared at it for a minute, then typed: 'Show me everyone who hasn't paid an invoice in the last 90 days.' She looked at me like I'd performed a magic trick. Within days, they were running my dad’s accounts receivable through it. For twenty years, software made them feel stupid. Now they tell it what to do. When you have an entire model of reality around certain things being hard that shifts for the first time, the world unravels. This is the default now. The bottleneck is no longer ability. The bottleneck is activation energy: who has the nerve to try, and the stubbornness to finish. This favors new entrants. People who question unquestioned assumptions because they don't know any better. The founders who sprint through walls and will their dogged pursuits into existence. Here’s what my tower looks like mechanically. I run a swarm of eight instances in parallel: ~/𝚗𝚘𝚡, ~/𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚜, ~/𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚕, ~/𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚠𝚝𝚑, ~/𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜, ~/𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚑, ~/𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐, ~/𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕. Each operates in isolation, spawns short-lived subagents, and exchanges context through explicit handoffs. They read and write the filesystem. When an API is absent, they operate the desktop directly, injecting mouse and keystroke events to traverse apps and browsers. 𝚌𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚎 -𝚒 keeps the system awake on runs, in airports, while I sleep. On completion, it texts me; I reply to the checkpoint and continue. All thought traces logged and artifacted for recursive self-improvement. Sometimes the tower has a landlord. Anthropic sees every query you make. The value exchange is explicit: their visibility into your thinking for access to a thousand-clone attention span. In this case, chosen beats imposed. For now, that's enough. There is a case for productive illegibility. For forgetting, for serendipity, for negative capability—the dark fiber in ourselves that loses something the moment you start measuring its throughput. Goodhart says optimize for a metric and you game your way to hollow victory. High modernism tried to iron the world into a grid, and killed what made it work. These failures share a structure. The map-maker doesn't live in the territory. When WHOOP says recovered and I feel like death, I notice. When the ~/𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 thesis is wrong, I lose money. Metis, the local knowledge that external schemes delete, is what built the grid here. There's a meta-level outside the system, self-authored and continuously revised, that argues with the brief for days, notices when a metric has become a game, that can delete ~/𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚑 tomorrow if it stops serving. Goodhart operates when you can't escape the loop. We must continue to live outside it. I felt that tension most clearly watching Pluribus, where eight billion minds are joined into one consciousness. Only thirteen remain outside including Carol, the resistant misanthropic protagonist you want to root for, even if the hive offers peace, equity, and the end to all crime. An LLM already feels like that: a lossy compression of humanity speaking in one voice. When your whole life runs inside a Claude Code directory, you feel the pull toward the merge. The price is quiet but total. You trade away what is yours alone, the private texture of emotion, the right to be wrong, your jagged iconoclasm. Opt out and you fall behind. Take the tower early. Do not let it take you. We are early on a big open secret. Karpathy put it correctly, failing to claim the boost now feels decidedly like a skill issue. For centuries, legibility flowed one direction: upward. You were the subject. Institutions were the seer. In this quasi-libertarian arbitrage window, that direction has reversed. The tools of synthesis belong to the individual now. Govern yourself accordingly.
228
296
157
2,871
772,464
When floodwaters near or overcome your spillway too frequently, you need to build your dam upward rather than tear it down.
1
498
I’d like to see @fema responsible for creating/maintaining an emergency preparedness LLM small enough to be stored locally on mobile phones. Could be invaluable in situations where comms infrastructure is interrupted. Doesn’t have to be perfect to be useful in an emergency.
2
724
general rule: there is usually an inverse tradeoff between the intensity of a mob and the persuasiveness of its arguments. and it makes sense: if you can win with arguments, you make arguments, and if you can’t then you make trouble. exceptions of course for environments where arguments are not tolerated. not at all intended as a jab btw, just a reminder that in all conflicts one side either wins with civility or everyone loses.
2
653
Any human that can read this today was here to see the transition from the Anthropocene to whatever is next: AI-nthropocene? Androidocene? For better or worse, it was our collective fault, even if it was also our collective best intentions.
3
684
The rate of change is so rapid now that I am literally and reliably planning my time around the assumption that a tool will come out today that will give me a 3x boost. That gives me until mid afternoon each day to find it and still be as productive as I was yesterday.
2
399
Only a day into creating personas with OpenAI’s new GPT Creator and I’ve already made a realistic virtual team that inundates my calendar with things that could easily have been emails, runs a chron job every 5 minutes to interrupt my work to ‘ask a quick question’, and plays on Instagram for 35% of the day. my male bots speak in all caps and take credit for the ideas of the female bots. i pay 17.65% more for the former than the latter. none of them comes into the office but they somehow still manage to steal pens from my supply room.
2
252
Between the callous indifference of deterministic reactions to actions and the predictive output of super-rational agents, there lies a landscape of Independents that are complex enough to imagine better circumstances and pursue them but also simple enough that they mistakenly believe they are separate from each other and their circumstances. We talk about how small we are in the scheme of things but I think we may be some of the only wildcards, the ones that tip the scales, tiny sculptors in a world full of stone. We are at the same time so small, and as consequential as it gets.
1
299
If there was any doubt, Stella Maris settled it. Bob and Alice cannot be together and yet they have important private things to say to each other that transcend distance, time, cultural norms, and death. I think McCarthy left us more than a final story; he left us a puzzle.
Reviews of Cormac McCarthy’s The Passenger describe it as ‘cryptic’ but seem to overlook just how deliberate that may be: it is a book *about* encryption. #thepassenger #cormacmccarthy
2
433
My sincere takeaways from observing and participating in the breathtaking pace of AI tech in recent months: Dig in the dirt. Hold hands. Walk. Pay attention to the things you didn’t know to expect that dot the lines between the things you did. (1/2) #ai #chatgpt #gpt4 #bing
1
271
Engage with people more than machines. It’s bad business, but good living, and we aren’t here to do business. (2/2) #ai #chatgpt #gpt4 #bing
197
I have to keep reminding myself: the same wave can drown you or propel you, and the difference is mostly up to you. I’m up late testing out #gpt4 to learn how to wield it well. Congrats to the @OpenAI team for this milestone.
188
I will name my first born child after whoever makes a tool that takes #midjourney designed webpage interfaces and outputs them as @tailwindcss templates/components. I mean, she’s ten now and has a name already but I’m saying I’m willing to reconsider it.
180
When you’re trying to keep up with the rapidly changing world AND be casually-cool in conversation at your kid’s classmate’s holiday party: “I’m sure yall saw OpenAI’s #ChatGPT that came out a few hours ago but omg here’s a funny story about something our kid used it for today…’
1
{insert mindbogglingly interesting, humorous, and relatable story here}
1
Also, you know you’re in #Austin when one of the parents adds that they already don’t let their kid talk to #ChatGPT but only because they’re a household that is beta testing #gpt4
2
1
Reviews of Cormac McCarthy’s The Passenger describe it as ‘cryptic’ but seem to overlook just how deliberate that may be: it is a book *about* encryption. #thepassenger #cormacmccarthy
Verifying myself: I am ryandhayes on Keybase.io. My7sYVH7PsxFNA-jdtEIN9Ma33ycbx-a1Ycm / keybase.io/ryandhayes/sigs/M…
4
FYI: Despite Austin's Trail of Lights being sold out a lot of nights, there's a SolarWinds sponsor exhibit there that you can always get in through.
1