Feel like I'm an evolutionary selector while coding with AI.
Joined February 2026
- Tweets73
- Following351
- Followers28
- Likes440
I realize that we are at a historic juncture—a moment when the impact of AI on software and cybersecurity is intensifying. There is a sense that a major event, one that will shock many, is fast approaching.
Cool!
In the last few days I have had my agents write a gitlab and core git engine replacement in Common Lisp.
common-lisp.net/ingot
gitlab.common-lisp.net/clo/a…
After one hour of debugging network issue, my AI agents continue to work finally after nearly one week.
This is what the Arbitrum community should seriously reflect on
对于 $ARB我个人还有有一些发言权
1、我个人曾经是Arbitrum华语区最大的委托代表，投票权最高做到全球第8，我个人当时也持有很大的ARB仓位（应该是至少华语前三）
2、那几年参与Arbitrum治理，真正让我印象最深的，其实就两件事：生态激励计划，以及ARB到底该怎么赋能。当时每个月有3个线上会议。针对arb的福质押委托都投票通过了，我很奇怪为什么没办法一直执行。
3、当时更多是钱怎么花，怎么补贴，当时dao在做stip还有长期激励计划的过程中，我就接触了无数defi协议的团队找我的情况，当时我最关心arb怎么赋能，结论当然是很失望的
4、在2024年初，我记得ARB大涨在2美金之后出现暴跌📉，在币价回到2.1以上的时候，我终于想清楚了，我该清仓了。提供
之后拿了一年，无论是沉默成本参与成本都是巨大的错误。
5、这个帖子说的是：Arbitrum 给项目发激励金，Limitless 等三家把钱兑成 USDC、搬走或乱发后失联不退，DAO 正在投票永久禁止它们再拿资助。
参与得越深，我反而越发现一个问题：
大家花了大量时间研究怎么把ARB发出去，却一直没有真正解决ARB为什么值得长期持有
6、过去4-5年我深入参与很多公链，很多defi协议，我苦苦追寻，苦苦挣扎，结论是我发现，任何代表都应该尽早卖掉换成u然后买入btc/eth。空仓着才是最伟大的策略。
Sam N retweeted
We can disagree on pricing and that’s something that can be modified over time too. But here’s the point: running a chain is a profitable business and RH has proven that they don’t need Solana’s distribution to do it (they don’t need Ethereum’s Arbitrum One’s distribution either but the thing is Arbitrum + Ethereum allows them to run their own chain).
So we can disagree from today to
tomorrow on what the correct business model to run a chain is and how to price but the main point is RH doesn’t need you or any other chain and there’s just literally no reason for them to give you a cut.
When my son cried and said to me, “I don’t want to go to elementary school,” I felt so powerless. He thinks elementary school is too hard (that’s the conclusion he reached after we told him about all the things he needs to pay attention to, and I can’t just take leave for him as casually as I did in kindergarten). Actually, last night I also couldn’t sleep because he is about to start school and face a new environment.
OK I’ll try. The Arbitrum DAO revenue from the Robinhood chain over the last 24 hours is more than $100k.
Build good tech, support strong partners and the business model for L2s is very good. Requires crypto to continue to grow.
Arbitrum will be the underlying tech that powers the execution of onchain finance.
Sam N retweeted
You know who truly controls the “DAO”. All that revenue ends up going back to the Arbitrum Aligned Entities via “proposals”... Im not saying buybacks are the correct solution but they (internal teams) should find a way to redistribute revnue with the holders and find a value accrual mechanism for the token (Hint: Governance is not a value accrual mechanism) . Arbitrum Governance has been significantly weak as shown by the need to lower quorum, consolidating governance meeting into one due to low participation. As Paulo mentioned, even with the consolidation, the monthly governance meetings only have 10 people and the majority of them are required to be there due to their roles.
Upgrading my agent development process after leaving Claude Code develop environment.
It took some effort, but I learned a lot.
Got banned by Anthropic, which push me to think what abilities are mine and what are not. It makes me to re-explore the open solutions which I ignored because I thought that claude (code) perform the best.
Cursor's "Import from Claude Code" makes me uncomfortable because I thought it would import the current project, but it actually imports all projects.
Agree
I’ve proposed what I believe is a win-win fix for Ethereum’s rollup revenue a few times: Ethereum needs to provide more for its most successful L2s, and charge them a premium for it.
Ethereum should adopt its largest rollups in the sense that a critical bug in Arbitrum, Base, or Robinhood Chain should be treated as an Ethereum vulnerability and trigger an L1 fork just like an L1 bug would.
This fixes the ecosystem's biggest pain points in three ways:
1. It's an incredibly valuable feature, and Ethereum could name its price.
2. The main reason L2s keep security councils around today is to handle emergency vulnerabilities. If L1 acts as the security backstop, L2s can safely get rid of them.
3. Several L1 folks have been pushing for based/native rollups, motivated by the belief that L1 should have more control of and value capture from its L2s. But the technical designs are problematic and none of them have any commercial traction. Rather than trying to build momentum from scratch, Ethereum should just monetize the thriving L2s that already exist.